BTC $79,618.19 -0.28%
ETH $2,508.59 +0.58%
BNB $747.09 -0.64%
XRP $1.41 -0.18%
SOL $105.71 -0.50%
TRX $0.3355 +0.04%
DOGE $0.0917 +2.59%
ADA $0.2240 +2.54%
BCH $261.68 +1.30%
LINK $13.28 +8.23%
HYPE $88.03 -0.93%
AAVE $134.74 -0.00%
SUI $0.8344 +4.86%
XLM $0.1945 +4.84%
ZEC $1,187.28 +0.30%
BTC $79,618.19 -0.28%
ETH $2,508.59 +0.58%
BNB $747.09 -0.64%
XRP $1.41 -0.18%
SOL $105.71 -0.50%
TRX $0.3355 +0.04%
DOGE $0.0917 +2.59%
ADA $0.2240 +2.54%
BCH $261.68 +1.30%
LINK $13.28 +8.23%
HYPE $88.03 -0.93%
AAVE $134.74 -0.00%
SUI $0.8344 +4.86%
XLM $0.1945 +4.84%
ZEC $1,187.28 +0.30%

Vitalik: For an L2-centric ecosystem to succeed, it is essential to understand and address challenges such as coordination

2024-05-23 13:04:33

ChainCatcher message, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated that Layer 2 and sharding are often described as two opposing strategies for blockchain scalability in public discussions. However, when you delve into the underlying technology, a puzzle emerges: the actual scaling methods are completely the same. Both have some form of data sharding, both have fraud proofs or ZK-SNARK proofs, and both have methods to solve cross {rollup, shard} communication. The main difference lies in who is responsible for building and updating these components, and how much autonomy they possess.

A Layer 2-centric ecosystem technically realizes sharding very effectively, but it is a sharding that can create its own rules. This is very powerful and can inspire a great deal of creativity and independent innovation. However, it also presents key challenges, especially in terms of coordination. For a Layer 2-centric ecosystem like Ethereum to succeed, it needs to understand these challenges and address them head-on to gain as many advantages as possible from a Layer 1-centric ecosystem while getting as close as possible to having the best features of both.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.