BTC $79,167.47 -0.77%
ETH $2,494.69 +0.07%
BNB $740.71 -0.98%
XRP $1.40 -0.87%
SOL $103.94 -2.19%
TRX $0.3340 -0.34%
DOGE $0.0898 +0.95%
ADA $0.2207 +1.03%
BCH $259.98 +1.30%
LINK $12.90 +4.88%
HYPE $85.15 -3.34%
AAVE $132.36 -0.73%
SUI $0.8193 +2.95%
XLM $0.1908 +3.82%
ZEC $1,165.88 -3.60%
BTC $79,167.47 -0.77%
ETH $2,494.69 +0.07%
BNB $740.71 -0.98%
XRP $1.40 -0.87%
SOL $103.94 -2.19%
TRX $0.3340 -0.34%
DOGE $0.0898 +0.95%
ADA $0.2207 +1.03%
BCH $259.98 +1.30%
LINK $12.90 +4.88%
HYPE $85.15 -3.34%
AAVE $132.36 -0.73%
SUI $0.8193 +2.95%
XLM $0.1908 +3.82%
ZEC $1,165.88 -3.60%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

Связанные теги
Связанные теги
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.