BTC $79,144.10 -0.96%
ETH $2,488.39 -0.28%
BNB $739.26 -1.34%
XRP $1.40 -1.13%
SOL $103.83 -2.13%
TRX $0.3345 -0.22%
DOGE $0.0897 +0.33%
ADA $0.2196 +0.29%
BCH $260.32 +1.38%
LINK $12.74 +2.72%
HYPE $85.13 -3.22%
AAVE $131.72 -1.32%
SUI $0.8244 +3.53%
XLM $0.1900 +3.18%
ZEC $1,156.96 -5.79%
BTC $79,144.10 -0.96%
ETH $2,488.39 -0.28%
BNB $739.26 -1.34%
XRP $1.40 -1.13%
SOL $103.83 -2.13%
TRX $0.3345 -0.22%
DOGE $0.0897 +0.33%
ADA $0.2196 +0.29%
BCH $260.32 +1.38%
LINK $12.74 +2.72%
HYPE $85.13 -3.22%
AAVE $131.72 -1.32%
SUI $0.8244 +3.53%
XLM $0.1900 +3.18%
ZEC $1,156.96 -5.79%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.