BTC $79,493.82 -0.59%
ETH $2,493.83 -0.36%
BNB $745.33 -1.58%
XRP $1.41 -1.30%
SOL $105.29 -1.42%
TRX $0.3353 +0.10%
DOGE $0.0903 +0.57%
ADA $0.2213 -0.02%
BCH $257.83 -0.71%
LINK $13.23 +7.29%
HYPE $88.16 -1.26%
AAVE $135.02 -0.64%
SUI $0.8319 +3.85%
XLM $0.1948 +4.36%
ZEC $1,195.76 +1.73%
BTC $79,493.82 -0.59%
ETH $2,493.83 -0.36%
BNB $745.33 -1.58%
XRP $1.41 -1.30%
SOL $105.29 -1.42%
TRX $0.3353 +0.10%
DOGE $0.0903 +0.57%
ADA $0.2213 -0.02%
BCH $257.83 -0.71%
LINK $13.23 +7.29%
HYPE $88.16 -1.26%
AAVE $135.02 -0.64%
SUI $0.8319 +3.85%
XLM $0.1948 +4.36%
ZEC $1,195.76 +1.73%

ZachXBT: WLFI should carefully label high-risk addresses, as false positives can cause irreparable damage to reputation

2025-09-07 17:44:21

ChainCatcher message, "on-chain detective" ZachXBT posted on the X platform: "Sometimes so-called high-risk addresses may be incorrect, so the WLFI team cannot simply rely on compliance tools. Recently, I helped a team manually review the addresses of a presale, and after manual review, it was found that certain exchanges/smart contracts were incorrectly labeled as high risk. In many cases, even top compliance tools have significant flaws. I am glad to see that the World Liberty Financial team has taken a more proactive approach than other teams like Circle, as this will ultimately benefit the victims, but they do need to be cautious; otherwise, if false positives are blacklisted, it could cause irreparable damage to their reputation. The difficult part is finding the balance, and if the address is indeed a false positive, I hope the issue can be resolved quickly."

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.