BTC $79,422.35 -0.72%
ETH $2,491.55 -0.35%
BNB $744.25 -1.73%
XRP $1.40 -1.34%
SOL $105.10 -1.48%
TRX $0.3368 +0.79%
DOGE $0.0897 -0.31%
ADA $0.2193 -0.03%
BCH $257.02 -1.49%
LINK $13.29 +8.06%
HYPE $87.78 -0.02%
AAVE $134.76 -0.14%
SUI $0.8128 +1.78%
XLM $0.1921 +2.83%
ZEC $1,208.14 +1.71%
BTC $79,422.35 -0.72%
ETH $2,491.55 -0.35%
BNB $744.25 -1.73%
XRP $1.40 -1.34%
SOL $105.10 -1.48%
TRX $0.3368 +0.79%
DOGE $0.0897 -0.31%
ADA $0.2193 -0.03%
BCH $257.02 -1.49%
LINK $13.29 +8.06%
HYPE $87.78 -0.02%
AAVE $134.76 -0.14%
SUI $0.8128 +1.78%
XLM $0.1921 +2.83%
ZEC $1,208.14 +1.71%
first_img

CFTC acknowledges that it should not sue Gemini and jointly requests the court to withdraw the consent order

2026-05-28 10:12:12

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced on Tuesday that it has jointly filed a motion with Gemini Trust Company LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, requesting the dismissal of a previous judgment against Gemini.

The case was originally filed in June 2022, and the parties reached a consent order in January 2025. After a comprehensive review, the CFTC concluded that the lawsuit should not have been filed and would not be filed under current enforcement standards.

The review identified six major issues: the complaint was primarily based on statements from a whistleblower of questionable credibility; the investigation targeted Gemini as a victim of fraud rather than the alleged fraudster; there were serious doubts about the strength of the evidence against Gemini; relevant supporting materials were concealed and not submitted to the commissioners during the CFTC's vote on the complaint; the litigation team invoked deliberative process privilege to prevent Gemini from obtaining evidence necessary for its defense; and personnel improperly used CFTC regulatory power to create leverage for settlement.

The CFTC determined that continuing to enforce the forward-looking provisions of the consent order is neither consistent with its mission nor in the public interest, and that the non-forward-looking provisions of the consent order (such as civil penalties) have been fulfilled. The parties jointly request the court to vacate the remaining forward-looking provisions.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.