BTC $77,220.74 -1.03%
ETH $2,466.23 -0.12%
BNB $713.76 -0.47%
XRP $1.35 -1.93%
SOL $99.85 -1.24%
TRX $0.3386 -0.25%
DOGE $0.0839 -1.43%
ADA $0.2080 -2.17%
BCH $227.15 -8.22%
LINK $11.51 -2.09%
HYPE $80.05 -3.56%
AAVE $122.94 -0.53%
SUI $0.7385 -3.07%
XLM $0.1766 -1.36%
ZEC $1,114.35 -7.92%
BTC $77,220.74 -1.03%
ETH $2,466.23 -0.12%
BNB $713.76 -0.47%
XRP $1.35 -1.93%
SOL $99.85 -1.24%
TRX $0.3386 -0.25%
DOGE $0.0839 -1.43%
ADA $0.2080 -2.17%
BCH $227.15 -8.22%
LINK $11.51 -2.09%
HYPE $80.05 -3.56%
AAVE $122.94 -0.53%
SUI $0.7385 -3.07%
XLM $0.1766 -1.36%
ZEC $1,114.35 -7.92%

production

Tất cả
Bài viết
Tin nhanh

Grafana: Investigation reveals that recent security incidents have not affected customer production systems and operations

The open-source data visualization tool Grafana has released the latest progress on the investigation of the security incident on May 16. The investigation found that this incident was limited to the GitHub environment of Grafana Labs, including both public and private source code as well as internal GitHub repositories, and did not affect customer production systems, operations, or the Grafana Cloud platform. The downloaded content, in addition to the source code, also included some repositories used by the team for collaboration and storage of internal operational information and business details, involving business contact names and email addresses, rather than data from production systems or the cloud platform.Grafana Labs has made it clear that the codebase was downloaded but not tampered with, and currently, customers and open-source users do not need to take any action. The incident originated from a TanStack npm supply chain attack conducted through the Mini Shai-Hulud campaign. Grafana Labs detected malicious activity on May 11 and initiated an emergency response, but a credential was overlooked, allowing the attacker to gain access. After receiving a ransom demand on May 16, the company decided not to pay the ransom and has rotated automated credentials, implemented enhanced monitoring, audited all commits since May 11, and significantly strengthened GitHub security configurations. The company has notified federal law enforcement, and the investigation is ongoing.

JPMorgan: The production cost of Bitcoin has decreased from $90,000 at the beginning of the year to $77,000

According to The Block, JPMorgan analysts have stated that their estimated production cost of Bitcoin—historically viewed as a "soft price support"—has decreased from $90,000 at the beginning of the year to $77,000, primarily due to a recent decline in network hash rate and mining difficulty.Analysts pointed out that the recent drop in Bitcoin's network hash rate has triggered the largest adjustment in mining difficulty since the Chinese mining ban in 2021, with a cumulative decline of about 15% so far this year. The decrease in difficulty provides breathing room for miners still in operation, as efficient miners are capturing market share lost by high-cost miners who have been forced to shut down. Analysts have observed a rebound in hash rate and expect that production costs may rebound during the next difficulty adjustment.The report attributes the decline in difficulty to two factors: first, the drop in Bitcoin prices has rendered high-cost miners unprofitable; second, winter storms in the U.S. have temporarily halted operations at large mining facilities in places like Texas. Some high-cost miners have maintained operations or transitioned to AI by selling off Bitcoin, exacerbating the price pressure since the beginning of the year. Analysts believe that the exit of high-cost miners has stabilized, and they maintain a "positive" outlook for the overall cryptocurrency market in 2026.

Bitcoin miners enter the "surrender phase": production costs inverted, both hash rate and stock prices under pressure

Bitcoin mining has entered a severe phase, with unit hash rate revenue dropping to a historical low of about $35/PH. Affected by a significant market correction, the price of Bitcoin has fallen over 50% from its 2025 peak of $126,000, currently hovering around the $60,000 range. Against this backdrop, the average production cost of a single Bitcoin across the network is approximately $87,000, about 45% higher than the current market price, marking the first large-scale "underwater operation" since the bear market of 2022.CryptoQuant defines the current phase as the "surrender phase," characterized by the accelerated shutdown of old mining machines and a noticeable contraction in overall network hash rate. As a result, the stock prices of listed mining companies such as MARA Holdings and Riot Platforms have dropped over 20% this week, with funds flowing towards more stable traditional assets like gold.Meanwhile, North America's mining hubs (especially Texas) are facing severe winter storms, forcing some mining farms to limit power usage to ensure the stability of the civilian power grid. Coupled with miner exits, the network experienced a historic difficulty adjustment of about 11% on February 9. However, due to the significant drop in coin prices, the profitability recovery effect from the difficulty adjustment is limited.The industry's "Miner Profitability Sustainability Index" has fallen to 21, indicating that, except for a few operators with low electricity costs and high efficiency, most miners have completely compressed profit margins. For companies with electricity prices above $0.05 per kilowatt-hour or those still using older model mining machines, this difficulty adjustment is unlikely to reverse the risk of total shutdown.To cope with the "2026 mining winter," leading companies are accelerating their transition to artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing (HPC). IREN and Core Scientific have redirected some of their data center power capacity to support generative AI businesses to secure more stable long-term contract revenues. Recently, Bitfarms announced a complete exit from Bitcoin mining to focus on its AI strategic transformation.

The Canadian Court of Appeal ruled that the Ontario Securities Commission's request for document production from Binance was "overly broad" and unconstitutional

The Ontario Court of Appeal ruled in the case of "Binance Holdings Limited v. Ontario Securities Commission (OSC)" to revoke the OSC's previous large-scale document request against Binance, stating that its "scope is shocking" and violates Section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms regarding "protection against unreasonable search and seizure."The court noted that although capital market participants have a lower expectation of privacy in regulated activities, they are still protected by the Charter. The OSC had previously requested Binance to submit "all internal and related party communication records involving Canada for a period of two and a half years," which the court found exceeded reasonable regulatory purposes. The ruling emphasized that regulatory investigations may proceed without evidence of wrongdoing, but must still be limited to "categories of documents reasonably related to the investigation's purpose," or they may be dismissed by the court.Additionally, the court commented on Binance's use of encrypted communication tools like Signal that feature "self-destructing messages," stating that the mere use of such technology is insufficient to infer an intent to "evade regulation," providing important clarification for financial institutions using privacy communication software. This ruling is seen as establishing the boundaries of Canadian securities regulatory authority and reminding companies that they can assert the privacy and due process rights granted by the Charter when faced with cross-border or overly broad investigation requests.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.