BTC $81,242.55 +4.39%
ETH $2,525.76 +5.21%
BNB $723.54 +2.16%
XRP $1.45 +6.07%
SOL $104.16 +3.51%
TRX $0.3290 +0.31%
DOGE $0.0878 +5.78%
ADA $0.2214 +7.02%
BCH $259.97 +3.88%
LINK $12.05 +7.08%
HYPE $86.92 +6.12%
AAVE $133.49 +3.04%
SUI $0.7748 +0.94%
XLM $0.1848 +4.12%
ZEC $1,003.58 +19.55%
BTC $81,242.55 +4.39%
ETH $2,525.76 +5.21%
BNB $723.54 +2.16%
XRP $1.45 +6.07%
SOL $104.16 +3.51%
TRX $0.3290 +0.31%
DOGE $0.0878 +5.78%
ADA $0.2214 +7.02%
BCH $259.97 +3.88%
LINK $12.05 +7.08%
HYPE $86.92 +6.12%
AAVE $133.49 +3.04%
SUI $0.7748 +0.94%
XLM $0.1848 +4.12%
ZEC $1,003.58 +19.55%

山东法院民法典适用典型案例:目前对数字藏品的发行、交易并未有法律明令禁止

2024-10-12 15:52:16

ChainCatcher 消息,济南市莱芜区人民法院公众号公布山东法院民法典适用典型案例 167,数字藏品法律属性及其交易行为效力的认定(杨某某诉某文创公司买卖合同纠纷案),裁判要旨指出,数字藏品是一种网络虚拟财产,我国目前对数字藏品的发行、交易并未有法律明令禁止,对民事主体之间发生的数字藏品交易行为,只要行为人具有相应的民事行为能力、意思表示真实,即应认定为合法、有效。

数字藏品兼具收藏和投资的双重属性,蕴含了较高的市场风险,购买人以赚取数字藏品二级市场交易差价为目的,不应认定为《消费者权益保护法》上的消费者,应承担相应的市场价格波动风险。

app_icon
ChainCatcher 与创新者共建Web3世界