Scan to download
BTC $60,136.57 +1.22%
ETH $1,576.98 +2.02%
BNB $562.03 -0.30%
XRP $1.05 +2.91%
SOL $71.56 +4.33%
TRX $0.3207 -0.29%
DOGE $0.0750 +2.06%
ADA $0.1466 +2.07%
BCH $195.95 +1.32%
LINK $7.33 +2.46%
HYPE $62.95 +1.73%
AAVE $95.28 +11.58%
SUI $0.6968 +2.98%
XLM $0.1766 +1.27%
ZEC $406.30 +2.66%
BTC $60,136.57 +1.22%
ETH $1,576.98 +2.02%
BNB $562.03 -0.30%
XRP $1.05 +2.91%
SOL $71.56 +4.33%
TRX $0.3207 -0.29%
DOGE $0.0750 +2.06%
ADA $0.1466 +2.07%
BCH $195.95 +1.32%
LINK $7.33 +2.46%
HYPE $62.95 +1.73%
AAVE $95.28 +11.58%
SUI $0.6968 +2.98%
XLM $0.1766 +1.27%
ZEC $406.30 +2.66%

Vitalik: For an L2-centric ecosystem to succeed, it is essential to understand and address challenges such as coordination

2024-05-23 13:04:33
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated that Layer 2 and sharding are often described as two opposing strategies for blockchain scalability in public discussions. However, when you delve into the underlying technology, a puzzle emerges: the actual scaling methods are completely the same. Both have some form of data sharding, both have fraud proofs or ZK-SNARK proofs, and both have methods to solve cross {rollup, shard} communication. The main difference lies in who is responsible for building and updating these components, and how much autonomy they possess.

A Layer 2-centric ecosystem technically realizes sharding very effectively, but it is a sharding that can create its own rules. This is very powerful and can inspire a great deal of creativity and independent innovation. However, it also presents key challenges, especially in terms of coordination. For a Layer 2-centric ecosystem like Ethereum to succeed, it needs to understand these challenges and address them head-on to gain as many advantages as possible from a Layer 1-centric ecosystem while getting as close as possible to having the best features of both.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.