Scan to download
BTC $80,964.05 +0.07%
ETH $2,300.33 +0.15%
BNB $676.54 +2.60%
XRP $1.46 -0.22%
SOL $95.13 -1.04%
TRX $0.3497 +0.14%
DOGE $0.1119 +1.72%
ADA $0.2728 -1.02%
BCH $440.19 -1.54%
LINK $10.53 +1.21%
HYPE $40.34 -1.87%
AAVE $98.15 -1.30%
SUI $1.25 -2.22%
XLM $0.1638 -1.08%
ZEC $557.79 -0.60%
BTC $80,964.05 +0.07%
ETH $2,300.33 +0.15%
BNB $676.54 +2.60%
XRP $1.46 -0.22%
SOL $95.13 -1.04%
TRX $0.3497 +0.14%
DOGE $0.1119 +1.72%
ADA $0.2728 -1.02%
BCH $440.19 -1.54%
LINK $10.53 +1.21%
HYPE $40.34 -1.87%
AAVE $98.15 -1.30%
SUI $1.25 -2.22%
XLM $0.1638 -1.08%
ZEC $557.79 -0.60%

Vitalik: For an L2-centric ecosystem to succeed, it is essential to understand and address challenges such as coordination

2024-05-23 13:04:33
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated that Layer 2 and sharding are often described as two opposing strategies for blockchain scalability in public discussions. However, when you delve into the underlying technology, a puzzle emerges: the actual scaling methods are completely the same. Both have some form of data sharding, both have fraud proofs or ZK-SNARK proofs, and both have methods to solve cross {rollup, shard} communication. The main difference lies in who is responsible for building and updating these components, and how much autonomy they possess.

A Layer 2-centric ecosystem technically realizes sharding very effectively, but it is a sharding that can create its own rules. This is very powerful and can inspire a great deal of creativity and independent innovation. However, it also presents key challenges, especially in terms of coordination. For a Layer 2-centric ecosystem like Ethereum to succeed, it needs to understand these challenges and address them head-on to gain as many advantages as possible from a Layer 1-centric ecosystem while getting as close as possible to having the best features of both.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.