BTC $79,688.64 -1.58%
ETH $2,456.17 -2.03%
BNB $720.61 -0.29%
XRP $1.40 -3.06%
SOL $101.89 -1.76%
TRX $0.3317 +0.51%
DOGE $0.0848 -2.66%
ADA $0.2111 -4.18%
BCH $246.14 -3.59%
LINK $11.66 -1.53%
HYPE $84.24 -3.16%
AAVE $130.93 -1.71%
SUI $0.7653 -1.58%
XLM $0.1792 -2.26%
ZEC $1,017.26 +8.19%
BTC $79,688.64 -1.58%
ETH $2,456.17 -2.03%
BNB $720.61 -0.29%
XRP $1.40 -3.06%
SOL $101.89 -1.76%
TRX $0.3317 +0.51%
DOGE $0.0848 -2.66%
ADA $0.2111 -4.18%
BCH $246.14 -3.59%
LINK $11.66 -1.53%
HYPE $84.24 -3.16%
AAVE $130.93 -1.71%
SUI $0.7653 -1.58%
XLM $0.1792 -2.26%
ZEC $1,017.26 +8.19%

Vitalik: "The financialized pseudonymous society" is not truly effective; governance structures require a more multidimensional concept of identity

2024-08-22 12:54:39

ChainCatcher message, Vitalik posted on X: "I believe that 'anonymous society', and even 'financialized pseudonymous society', is not really effective. A more multidimensional concept of identity (characterized by 'soulbinding') seems necessary; if you don't do this, the most stable governance structure will just be a de facto centralized structure, and others will be attacked by financialized governance. It can be said that even today, we can see these issues at play in DAOs.

Anonymity is a check and balance, its existence is to run the 'dark side of the cycle', but it itself cannot run the entire cycle. Just as you cannot operate a society with perpetual rebellious energy.

Regarding x-risk, I believe that diverse thinking can actually help us more effectively identify x-risk mitigation measures that people can support."

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.