BTC $76,934.49 -5.10%
ETH $2,205.89 -6.34%
BNB $688.41 -9.10%
XRP $1.22 -8.00%
SOL $93.65 -8.12%
TRX $0.3533 +7.38%
DOGE $0.0736 -7.60%
ADA $0.1852 -9.94%
BCH $266.42 -7.73%
LINK $10.39 -11.76%
HYPE $90.32 +12.36%
AAVE $117.85 -12.11%
SUI $0.8439 -10.45%
XLM $0.1593 -7.31%
ZEC $1,220.44 -6.25%
AAPL $352.49 +1.75%
AMZN $225.31 -11.10%
GOOGL $279.89 -5.44%
MSFT $528.21 -3.68%
META $618.54 +0.01%
NVDA $208.41 -2.86%
TSLA $395.45 -1.75%
SNDK $1,273.33 -8.13%
INTC $70.92 -24.40%
SPCX $139.38 -3.54%
MU $893.71 -8.10%
AMD $527.90 -7.29%
BTC $76,934.49 -5.10%
ETH $2,205.89 -6.34%
BNB $688.41 -9.10%
XRP $1.22 -8.00%
SOL $93.65 -8.12%
TRX $0.3533 +7.38%
DOGE $0.0736 -7.60%
ADA $0.1852 -9.94%
BCH $266.42 -7.73%
LINK $10.39 -11.76%
HYPE $90.32 +12.36%
AAVE $117.85 -12.11%
SUI $0.8439 -10.45%
XLM $0.1593 -7.31%
ZEC $1,220.44 -6.25%
AAPL $352.49 +1.75%
AMZN $225.31 -11.10%
GOOGL $279.89 -5.44%
MSFT $528.21 -3.68%
META $618.54 +0.01%
NVDA $208.41 -2.86%
TSLA $395.45 -1.75%
SNDK $1,273.33 -8.13%
INTC $70.92 -24.40%
SPCX $139.38 -3.54%
MU $893.71 -8.10%
AMD $527.90 -7.29%

Slow Fog: If Bybit upgrades the Safe contract to version 1.3.0 or higher and implements an appropriate Guard mechanism, it may avoid the theft of 1.5 billion dollars in assets

2025-02-26 16:49:20

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist stated that on February 21, 2025, Bybit's on-chain multi-signature wallet was targeted and breached, with nearly $1.5 billion in assets quietly lost through a transaction with a "legitimate signature." Subsequent on-chain analysis revealed that the attacker gained multi-signature permissions through sophisticated social engineering attacks, implanted malicious logic using the delegatecall function of the Safe contract, and ultimately bypassed the multi-signature verification mechanism to transfer funds to an anonymous address. "Multi-signature" does not equal "absolute security"; even a secure mechanism like the Safe multi-signature wallet can still be at risk of being compromised if lacking additional protective measures.

Bybit is using version v1.1.1 (<1.3.0) of the Safe contract, which means they cannot utilize the Guard mechanism, a key security feature. If Bybit had upgraded to version 1.3.0 or higher of the Safe contract and implemented an appropriate Guard mechanism, such as specifying a whitelist address for receiving funds and conducting strict contract function ACL verification, they might have been able to avoid this loss. Although this is merely a hypothesis, it provides important insights for future asset security management.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.