BTC $78,565.21 +1.90%
ETH $2,507.36 +0.69%
BNB $722.35 +0.52%
XRP $1.40 +4.40%
SOL $101.94 +1.67%
TRX $0.3398 -0.38%
DOGE $0.0840 +0.60%
ADA $0.2089 +1.55%
BCH $223.32 -0.17%
LINK $11.46 +1.73%
HYPE $79.86 +2.36%
AAVE $126.40 +0.55%
SUI $0.7252 +1.89%
XLM $0.1925 +8.03%
ZEC $1,135.14 +4.39%
AAPL $334.86 +1.19%
AMZN $253.66 -0.23%
GOOGL $345.17 +2.36%
MSFT $504.06 +2.39%
META $659.70 +2.72%
NVDA $212.26 -1.49%
TSLA $363.89 +0.28%
SNDK $1,535.41 -2.39%
INTC $97.58 -1.52%
SPCX $150.96 +1.28%
MU $919.03 -1.78%
AMD $489.76 -2.22%
BTC $78,565.21 +1.90%
ETH $2,507.36 +0.69%
BNB $722.35 +0.52%
XRP $1.40 +4.40%
SOL $101.94 +1.67%
TRX $0.3398 -0.38%
DOGE $0.0840 +0.60%
ADA $0.2089 +1.55%
BCH $223.32 -0.17%
LINK $11.46 +1.73%
HYPE $79.86 +2.36%
AAVE $126.40 +0.55%
SUI $0.7252 +1.89%
XLM $0.1925 +8.03%
ZEC $1,135.14 +4.39%
AAPL $334.86 +1.19%
AMZN $253.66 -0.23%
GOOGL $345.17 +2.36%
MSFT $504.06 +2.39%
META $659.70 +2.72%
NVDA $212.26 -1.49%
TSLA $363.89 +0.28%
SNDK $1,535.41 -2.39%
INTC $97.58 -1.52%
SPCX $150.96 +1.28%
MU $919.03 -1.78%
AMD $489.76 -2.22%

Slow Fog: If Bybit upgrades the Safe contract to version 1.3.0 or higher and implements an appropriate Guard mechanism, it may avoid the theft of 1.5 billion dollars in assets

2025-02-26 16:49:20

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist stated that on February 21, 2025, Bybit's on-chain multi-signature wallet was targeted and breached, with nearly $1.5 billion in assets quietly lost through a transaction with a "legitimate signature." Subsequent on-chain analysis revealed that the attacker gained multi-signature permissions through sophisticated social engineering attacks, implanted malicious logic using the delegatecall function of the Safe contract, and ultimately bypassed the multi-signature verification mechanism to transfer funds to an anonymous address. "Multi-signature" does not equal "absolute security"; even a secure mechanism like the Safe multi-signature wallet can still be at risk of being compromised if lacking additional protective measures.

Bybit is using version v1.1.1 (<1.3.0) of the Safe contract, which means they cannot utilize the Guard mechanism, a key security feature. If Bybit had upgraded to version 1.3.0 or higher of the Safe contract and implemented an appropriate Guard mechanism, such as specifying a whitelist address for receiving funds and conducting strict contract function ACL verification, they might have been able to avoid this loss. Although this is merely a hypothesis, it provides important insights for future asset security management.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.