BTC $79,119.03 +0.53%
ETH $2,504.63 +1.04%
BNB $753.15 +1.03%
XRP $1.43 +3.02%
SOL $104.23 +1.15%
TRX $0.3387 +0.95%
DOGE $0.0903 +0.80%
ADA $0.2202 +1.17%
BCH $259.79 +0.52%
LINK $12.57 -0.57%
HYPE $86.05 +2.08%
AAVE $129.88 -1.07%
SUI $0.8189 +0.34%
XLM $0.1896 -0.30%
ZEC $1,244.00 +10.68%
BTC $79,119.03 +0.53%
ETH $2,504.63 +1.04%
BNB $753.15 +1.03%
XRP $1.43 +3.02%
SOL $104.23 +1.15%
TRX $0.3387 +0.95%
DOGE $0.0903 +0.80%
ADA $0.2202 +1.17%
BCH $259.79 +0.52%
LINK $12.57 -0.57%
HYPE $86.05 +2.08%
AAVE $129.88 -1.07%
SUI $0.8189 +0.34%
XLM $0.1896 -0.30%
ZEC $1,244.00 +10.68%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.