BTC $78,873.23 +0.04%
ETH $2,497.25 +0.57%
BNB $751.50 +0.85%
XRP $1.43 +2.44%
SOL $103.88 +0.56%
TRX $0.3384 +1.05%
DOGE $0.0903 +0.52%
ADA $0.2193 +0.48%
BCH $260.05 +0.66%
LINK $12.50 -1.27%
HYPE $85.66 +1.72%
AAVE $129.03 -1.72%
SUI $0.8156 -0.31%
XLM $0.1883 -1.06%
ZEC $1,214.92 +7.70%
BTC $78,873.23 +0.04%
ETH $2,497.25 +0.57%
BNB $751.50 +0.85%
XRP $1.43 +2.44%
SOL $103.88 +0.56%
TRX $0.3384 +1.05%
DOGE $0.0903 +0.52%
ADA $0.2193 +0.48%
BCH $260.05 +0.66%
LINK $12.50 -1.27%
HYPE $85.66 +1.72%
AAVE $129.03 -1.72%
SUI $0.8156 -0.31%
XLM $0.1883 -1.06%
ZEC $1,214.92 +7.70%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.