BTC $64,171.74 +0.27%
ETH $1,868.96 +0.54%
BNB $566.73 +1.10%
XRP $1.10 +1.35%
SOL $74.39 +0.56%
TRX $0.3330 +0.88%
DOGE $0.0724 +5.04%
ADA $0.1651 +1.14%
BCH $209.99 +0.48%
LINK $8.40 +0.70%
HYPE $57.87 -1.46%
AAVE $92.13 -1.98%
SUI $0.7147 +0.21%
XLM $0.1787 +0.83%
ZEC $482.09 -1.59%
BTC $64,171.74 +0.27%
ETH $1,868.96 +0.54%
BNB $566.73 +1.10%
XRP $1.10 +1.35%
SOL $74.39 +0.56%
TRX $0.3330 +0.88%
DOGE $0.0724 +5.04%
ADA $0.1651 +1.14%
BCH $209.99 +0.48%
LINK $8.40 +0.70%
HYPE $57.87 -1.46%
AAVE $92.13 -1.98%
SUI $0.7147 +0.21%
XLM $0.1787 +0.83%
ZEC $482.09 -1.59%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.