Scan to download
BTC $61,346.55 -1.88%
ETH $1,585.18 -4.87%
BNB $581.20 -1.01%
XRP $1.09 -1.84%
SOL $63.19 -3.38%
TRX $0.3197 -1.55%
DOGE $0.0820 -1.97%
ADA $0.1587 -0.46%
BCH $225.13 +1.09%
LINK $7.43 -1.25%
HYPE $60.19 -2.16%
AAVE $61.98 -8.66%
SUI $0.7092 +1.67%
XLM $0.2025 +6.41%
ZEC $372.77 +19.72%
BTC $61,346.55 -1.88%
ETH $1,585.18 -4.87%
BNB $581.20 -1.01%
XRP $1.09 -1.84%
SOL $63.19 -3.38%
TRX $0.3197 -1.55%
DOGE $0.0820 -1.97%
ADA $0.1587 -0.46%
BCH $225.13 +1.09%
LINK $7.43 -1.25%
HYPE $60.19 -2.16%
AAVE $61.98 -8.66%
SUI $0.7092 +1.67%
XLM $0.2025 +6.41%
ZEC $372.77 +19.72%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.