Web3 VC metrics reorganized, a quick insight into which VC's invested projects can go public?
In the last issue, we only selected three exchanges: Binance, OKX, and Coinbase. This time we updated the listing rates for Bybit and Upbit, improving the indicators to achieve better statistical results.Author: Evan, @EvanCrypto17
Spend another 24 hours organizing, striving for perfection! Hope everyone can refer to more detailed and comprehensive content!
In the last issue, we only selected three exchanges: Binance, OKX, and Coinbase. This time we updated the listing rates for Bybit and Upbit, improving the indicators for better statistical results.
In this issue, we updated:
Unaccounted VC
Added Bybit listing rate
Added Upbit listing rate
VC average listing rate
Excellent VC evaluation
More objective quantitative scores
More intuitive UI interface
A total of 73 VCs were selected, including 35 domestic VCs, 30 foreign VCs, and 8 exchange VCs.
[Advance Statement]: This rating is based solely on the listing of tokens and does not involve the comprehensive strength and brand influence of VCs.
Based on the market share/growth rate/listing effect of Binance/Coinbase/OKX/Bybit/Upbit exchanges, the conclusions are as follows:
T0 Level: Continue Capital, Placeholder, YZi Labs (Binance Labs)
T1 Level: IOSG Ventures, Hack VC, Bain Capital Ventures, Mint Ventures
T2 Level: Paradigm, Sequoia China, Sequoia Capital, Multicoin, Polychain, etc.
T3 Level: a16z, Dragonfly, Coinbase Ventures, 1kx, etc.
T4 Level: Circle Ventures, Hashkey Capital, DCG, Bankless Ventures, etc.
T5 Level: Hash Global, Haun Venture, BTX Capital, Incuba Alpha
Based on VC regional ranking, the conclusion is: Foreign VCs > Exchange VCs > Domestic VCs
Based on the average level of VC token listings:
31 "excellent" VCs are above the average level for better reference, see the details in the chart.
Detailed data for each VC can be found in the Thread.
