How does CyberCharge allocate "rights" and "benefits"?

Institutional Token Economic Design: Deflation, Self-Circulation, and Incentive Order

In many Web3 projects, tokens are often seen as incentive tools or circulation mediums. However, in CyberCharge, tokens are not only a representation of value but also an encoder of rules and power. CyberCharge has designed a complete token system with the idea of "institutional primacy," constructing an economic order that operates automatically without human intervention through deflationary models, incentive paths, and behavior-binding logic. Therefore, we will start from the control of total token supply, circulation mechanisms, and the interrelationship of three core tokens to analyze how CyberCharge achieves a closed loop of "behavior equals value, rights equal tokens" in its economic model.
The token system of CyberCharge consists of multiple tokens, each playing different roles, yet collectively building a closed-loop economic order. Among them, the designs of GEM, CPT, and EST are the most representative, reflecting strong institutional characteristics.

Large Deflation Design and Fuel Destruction Mechanism

GEM:

The initial design of CyberCharge's token economic model revolves around the principle of high consumption and low release, with one of its core features being a strong deflationary logic. For CyberCharge, deflation is not the goal but a value adjustment mechanism, allowing tokens to continuously become "scarce," thus providing users with a more imaginative long-term return space. Taking the core token GEM in the platform as an example, its total supply cap is set at a relatively low range, currently set at approximately 5 billion tokens. Users will continuously consume GEM during processes such as charging mining and ecological interactions. A portion of GEM is permanently destroyed, while another portion flows back to the mining pool as subsequent incentive reserves. This design idea of using and destroying aims to achieve two goals: on one hand, to synchronize the reduction of market supply, maintaining the token's scarcity and intrinsic support; on the other hand, to gradually tilt value towards real participants, achieving a system where the more one uses, the more one contributes back.
Under the current concept, the system also introduces a decreasing production adjustment mechanism. When the cumulative destruction of GEM reaches certain specific thresholds, the mining output rate will experience a slight decrease. For example, when the destruction amount reaches 50 million tokens, the output efficiency in related scenarios may decrease by 1%, calculated at a coefficient of 0.99; if it reaches 100 million tokens destroyed, it will enter an iterative logic of 0.99 × 0.99, gradually decreasing. Overall, this design intends not to suppress output blindly but to construct a more controllable incentive release path closely linked to actual usage. The release speed of GEM will be more aligned with the real usage rhythm, avoiding the cyclical problem of "large early releases and inability to rise later." Currently, this mechanism is still in the continuous optimization stage and may undergo flexible adjustments based on community feedback and ecological performance in the future. The ultimate goal is to match the intensity of token circulation with usage activity, anchoring value more realistically in behavior rather than expectations.

EST:

As the exclusive token of the AIDOGGY ecosystem, EST is primarily used for the cultivation and interaction of virtual pets. Functionally, it supports core gameplay such as dog raising, cleaning, charging, and upgrading; each action serves as a validation of EST's value. Moreover, EST is not limited to current application scenarios; it will expand into Meme coin production, NFT circulation, and more innovative gameplay in the future, shifting its value logic from "tool" to "ecological blood." As the scale of the ecosystem expands, the value anchoring of EST will become more three-dimensional and have greater growth potential.

CPT and UCC:

A similar deflationary mechanism is also reflected in the design of the computing power token CPT. As the core token of the CyberCharge ecosystem, CPT plays multiple roles in behavior output, consumption payment, and some governance scenarios. In the current concept, its total release cap is set at no more than 100 billion tokens, most of which will be released through user behavior, with the remainder used for ecological construction and incentive support. When users consume CPT in actions such as purchasing items or participating in mining pools, half will be destroyed, and the other half will flow back to the mining pool. This mechanism aims to bind behavior with scarcity, forming a "use equals contraction" supply feedback path. Additionally, CPT also serves as the "fuel" function for UCC withdrawals. According to the current mechanism draft, users will need to consume additional CPT when exchanging UCC for USDT, and all will be destroyed. This design sets a cost threshold for value outflow and helps adjust the system's circulation rhythm through continuous burning. Overall, the deflationary logic of CPT serves not only short-term incentives but also acts as an "economic valve" at the institutional level, maintaining the balance and sustainability of the token system during ecological expansion.

One Token, Four Worlds

In the economic system of CyberCharge, GEM, CPT, and UCC are not merely functional tokens but represent three on-chain stages traversed by user behavior: immediate output, rights accumulation, and value realization. They reflect both behavior and the rights paths granted by the institution, forming an endogenous circular device that transforms individual participation into system value.
GEM belongs to "the world of the present." It is the entry point of behavior and the carrier of immediate rewards. Users receive GEM as feedback whenever they complete an operation, interaction, or real use in the ecosystem. This not only incentivizes user engagement but also continuously injects liquidity and activity into the platform. The existence of GEM ensures that ecological incentives are no longer reliant on airdrops, speculation, or expectations, but are genuinely built on the foundation of "behavior equals value." CPT belongs to "the world of the future." It represents the long-term rights of users in the ecosystem, serving as delayed returns after the accumulation of behavioral value. Users can convert GEM into CPT through mechanisms such as "gem delivery," thereby obtaining governance rights, dividend shares, or computing power indicators within the platform. The significance of CPT lies in its ability to empower "those who stay in the system" with future claims, acting as an institutional anchor connecting participants with the platform's evolutionary direction. It is used less for consumption and more for holding and accumulation, forming a structure of rights weight distribution within the ecosystem.

EST belongs to "the world of growth." It embodies companionship and cultivation—primarily circulating in scenarios such as dog raising, upgrading, and cleaning within AIDOGGY. EST serves as the "energy" for enhancing pet levels and is also a potential entry point for subsequent Meme applications. It is not meant for immediate returns but aims to shape a more playable and extendable user path through daily accumulation and ecological participation. As the AIDOGGY ecosystem expands, the boundaries of EST's use will continue to widen, and its intrinsic value will gain more support beyond behavior. UCC belongs to "the world of reality." As a stable token anchoring fiat currency value, it serves as a bridge for users exiting the ecosystem, providing a clear path for value realization. However, this path is not free: users must consume CPT as "fuel" when withdrawing, bearing a certain cost of value. This mechanism effectively prevents costless arbitrage and forces users to reconsider the "value of exit" before realizing their behavior, thereby reinforcing the value closed loop of the ecosystem.
The four tokens constitute a complete behavioral economic cycle system: from input ➝ accumulation ➝ realization ➝ recovery, continuously promoting the coexistence of incentive efficiency and institutional order in token circulation. This is not only a design of an incentive model but also an experimental mechanism of "binding power to behavior and creating order through participation." What CyberCharge seeks to answer is not merely "how to reward," but rather: in a behavior-driven on-chain world, who should own the future?

Beyond Institutions, Within Order

CyberCharge does not attempt to reshape governance with complex voting mechanisms or technical thresholds, nor does it view incentives merely as tools to attract traffic. What CyberCharge does is preset a value logic for participants at the institutional level: rights come from the continuous contribution of real behavior; benefits stem from the precise mapping of behavioral value within the institution. This token model does not rely on human management but automatically completes resource allocation and order maintenance through mechanism design, where behavior triggers incentives, rights accumulate, and exit incurs costs. Behind every operation lies not just transactions and feedback but also the implementation of institutions and order. Perhaps what is truly worth noting is not "how many tokens CyberCharge has issued," but rather the question it attempts to answer: how to construct a self-consistent power structure and interest order through incentive mechanisms without central control. This is a new distribution experiment, an order model embedded within the institution. And CyberCharge is just the beginning.