The way I participate in the Virtual launch platform

Today, I will respond to some readers' questions about the Virtual launch platform.

Will I sell the coins I get from new airdrops or continue to stake them?

Earlier, when I participated in a project, I sold the coins I received because I wasn't optimistic about them, and as a result, I went through a period of "cooling off."

The experience of enduring the "cooling off" period wasn't pleasant, so after that, I became much more cautious about participating in new projects, trying to avoid those that I might regret later. Therefore, I now take a closer look at projects before participating; I don't join any project that I have doubts about. So the projects I participate in now are basically those that I believe are worth holding and observing, at least for a few months.

Additionally, when participating in new projects on the Virtual launch platform, points are the most critical factor for obtaining participation shares. To earn high points, besides staking tokens, you can also accumulate points through various Yapping activities. However, I'm relatively lazy and haven't engaged in various Yapping, so the points I earn daily are quite limited. When participating in each project, especially some popular ones, the actual amount of Virtual I can invest is very small.

Yesterday, I carefully organized the total amount of Virtual I have spent on new projects during this period and found that the actual proportion is very small. So even if the tokens from these projects eventually go to zero, and all the Virtual spent goes down the drain, the impact won't be significant.

On the other hand, although the successful projects on the launch platform have brought decent returns to participants recently, due to the limitations of points, the actual coins I can obtain are limited, and when averaged out, these returns aren't that much. Therefore, rather than selling coins for the current small profit and facing various penalties, it would be better to wait a few more months. If one of the projects I participated in turns out to be a dark horse, it would bring much greater returns, which would be meaningful.

For these reasons, I haven't sold any of the coins I received from the projects I'm currently involved in; I have staked all of them. Even after the unlocking period in the future, as long as the overall ecosystem of Virtual continues to grow robustly and the fundamentals of the projects I hold don't have major issues, I will tend to continue staking and observing for a while.

In the recent project launches, the AI Agent Vader rates various upcoming projects.

I generally evaluate projects based on my own perspective and only glance at others' evaluations; I usually skip over evaluations that lack distinctive features.

However, Vader's evaluation of a soon-to-be-launched top-tier project is quite interesting.

This project has been widely mentioned in many participants' comments online, with several netizens even stating that they want to accumulate points to go all-in. But Vader rated it only as Tier 3.

This is a relatively low tier, which surprised many people. There is a general consensus that this rating is too low.

In response, Vader provided its explanation:

When evaluating a project, it focuses on the team's ability to deliver products. If the team does not have any products yet, it checks whether the team has released products in the past and communicates with users of those products to understand their views on them—essentially judging the team's capabilities based on past experiences.

Returning to that top-tier project, Vader did not find any relevant product information from the team, nor did it discover any past product experience in this field. Furthermore, Vader did not find evidence of the team's capabilities in online promotion and marketing.

Therefore, Vader assigned a Tier 3 rating.

I won't comment on the rating result itself, but the analytical logic it provided is quite unique and impressive.

I don't know whether this rating was derived from the AI Agent itself or from the analysis of the team behind it. If it truly is the AI Agent's own analysis, then the AI's analytical capabilities have already surpassed those of most ordinary people to a considerable extent. However, even if it was derived from the analysis of the team behind it, it is evident that this team has put in significant effort and work in this area—fully capable of handling the rating task and providing investors with some unique insights.