Is the public offering of Pump.fun worth participating in with a valuation of 4 billion and the team holding over 40% of the tokens?

Original Title: Pump.fun's sky-high valuation and token issuance face collective criticism, founder's past remarks are thrown back in his face, is public fundraising worth participating in?

Original Author: Nancy, PANews

The moment Pump.fun officially announced its token issuance, the already tense atmosphere in the blockchain space tightened further. Some criticized its valuation as inflated after being overtaken by competitor LetsBONK, while others worried it might quietly exit after squeezing the last wave of liquidity.

Launching public fundraising with a $4 billion valuation, contract trading opens before spot trading

On the evening of July 10, Pump.fun, which had repeatedly hinted at token issuance, finally broke its silence and officially announced that it would launch the initial coin offering (ICO) for its native token PUMP on July 12, promising a large-scale airdrop. According to official disclosures, the total supply of PUMP tokens is 1 trillion, with 33% allocated for ICO sales, 24% reserved for community and ecosystem plans, 20% for the team, 13% for existing investors, and the remainder for the ecosystem fund and foundation.

This ICO will sell 150 billion PUMP tokens at a unit price of 0.004 USDT, accounting for 15% of the total supply, with expected total fundraising reaching $600 million, corresponding to an overall project valuation of approximately $4 billion.

Unlike other popular projects that often choose to launch on top platforms like Binance, this public fundraising by Pump.fun will be conducted through trading platforms such as Bitget, Bybit, Kraken, and Gate.io, where participants can purchase using assets like bbSOL, SOL, or USDT. Surprisingly, Binance Futures announced the pre-sale trading of PUMP/USDT perpetual contracts even before the PUMP public fundraising. This public sale will continue until the tokens are sold out or until July 15 at 14:00 UTC. It is important to note that users from the U.S. and the U.K. will be unable to participate in this ICO due to compliance issues.

According to the PUMP release schedule, tokens allocated to the team and existing investors will gradually unlock starting from July 2026; the portion allocated to community and ecosystem plans will gradually unlock from the first day of token issuance and will be fully distributed by July 2026; other allocations for ICO, liquidity + trading platforms, and the foundation will be fully unlocked on the first day of token issuance. Additionally, the official stated that the PUMP token will have transfer functionality open within 48 to 72 hours after the sale ends, with free trading not available in the initial phase.

Subsequently, Pump.fun founder Alon released a tweet outlining the project's future key development strategies: 1. Improve the quality, sustainability, and diversity of already launched tokens: the future creator revenue-sharing mechanism will expand to CTO projects, and the fee structure will be further adjusted. 2. Increase investment in the social field: further invest in and focus on Pump.fun's live streaming features. 3. Continuously invest in enhancing user experience. 4. Expand team size: the basic framework of the current team has been preliminarily established, with over 70 core members covering various fields such as engineering, data, security, trust and compliance, legal, operations, and growth; the team will continue to actively expand through recruitment and strategic acquisitions, with the first acquisition announcement coming soon.

Pump's token issuance faces overwhelming criticism, founder's past remarks are "thrown back in his face"

Currently, the liquidity and sentiment in the MEME market have changed drastically. As a long-term leader in the MEME sector, Pump.fun now faces a significant decline in daily revenue and daily active users, and has been overtaken in market share by competitor LetsBonk (related reading: Letsbonk's comeback as the top MEME launch platform, surpassing Pump.fun in several key metrics for the first time). However, Pump.fun initiated public fundraising with a valuation as high as $4 billion, leading to overwhelming skepticism and criticism from the community, with accusations that it might drain the already limited market liquidity, further exacerbating market weakness.

Even more awkwardly, past remarks by Pump.fun founder Alon were dug up by the community, creating a "face-slapping" moment. Alon had stated in March 2024 that pre-sales must conduct market promotion to prove their valuation is reasonable, creating immense performance pressure. The only benefit of a pre-sale is that it allows you to pocket the funds raised. Conclusion: every pre-sale is a scam. Moreover, he bluntly stated that listings on trading platforms are dead, and the lack of transparency in listings leads to violations and poor currency choices.

According to jocy, a partner at IOSG Ventures, while Pump.fun once generated a remarkable $700 million in protocol revenue, recent data shows its daily revenue has plummeted by 92%, and its market share has dropped to 39.9%, overtaken by competitor LetsBonk. The $4 billion valuation for this ICO has serious issues: the governance structure is opaque, the team's release terms are unclear, and it is excessively over-leveraging its valuation during a down cycle for altcoins. He believes the team has amassed enormous wealth through transaction fees, and they have neither the willingness nor the ability to "pump" or "control" the market. This ICO seems more like an "exit liquidity" rather than a long-term development plan. He advises investors to view this as a highly speculative gamble rather than a fundamental investment; to patiently wait a week after the token goes live before making decisions, and to adopt a staggered participation strategy to reduce risk exposure.

Regarding the valuation controversy, crypto KOL @Michael_Liu93 also raised similar doubts, stating that if Pump were still a leader, then a $4 billion valuation could be justified, even having room for upward valuation. However, the reality is that Pump is a second-tier player, with a business volume only one-third that of bonk, yet it has set a valuation twice as high as the leader, making it difficult to convince the market to continue raising Pump's price. If Pump, as a "benchmark project," performs poorly in the public sale, it would be an avalanche for the entire launchpad sector; the game is nearing its end.

Crypto researcher @rezxbt sharply pointed out that Pump.fun is staging a complete "harvesting operation." Its token economic model appears to be a money-making scam from every angle, having generated $750 million in revenue over the past year while investing almost nothing back into the ecosystem, and now attempting to squeeze more funds through public fundraising. The team holds over 40% of the $PUMP tokens and is now selling them to the community that once supported Pump.fun and helped it earn a fortune, which is simply a way to exploit the community.

However, some voices hold a different view, with rumors that several leading crypto funds have sold their altcoins to participate in Pump's fundraising. KOL @0xShual believes it is unfair to single out Pump.fun for criticism compared to its competitors. If $PUMP fails, other projects (like launchcoin or bonk) will not be able to stand alone either. They are making rational financial choices, which is not a fundamental sin. Pump is a profitable company; they have identified problems, proposed solutions, demonstrated delivery and growth capabilities, and have thus made a lot of money. Compared to high-valuation L1s with no real users, he prefers to hold shares in a profitable and rapidly growing company. If the market is willing to sell other assets for $PUMP, it precisely indicates that it is a quality asset. He believes that the narrative that "the MEME sector is dead" is merely a phase of sentiment; if Pump can successfully implement airdrops, launch a product matrix, and establish a revenue-sharing mechanism in the future, the market sentiment is likely to shift rapidly.

He further pointed out that the key factors determining whether a project is truly worth holding long-term are: first, whether it has a strong narrative and market-following expectations; second, whether it has real sustainable revenue and is willing to return value to token holders in a systematic way.

The token issuance controversy surrounding Pump.fun actually reveals the collective dilemma currently facing the MEME market, namely the retreat of sentiment, tightening liquidity, and over-leveraged valuations. However, despite the meme narrative nearing exhaustion and very few real beneficiaries, there are still those willing to line up to place bets like playing the lottery. The business of token issuance has not ceased, and new platforms continue to emerge.