BTC $63,872.69 -0.12%
ETH $1,839.20 -1.51%
BNB $567.01 -1.24%
XRP $1.08 -0.62%
SOL $75.03 -0.80%
TRX $0.3227 -0.11%
DOGE $0.0724 -0.25%
ADA $0.1678 +3.85%
BCH $219.05 -2.08%
LINK $8.24 -1.29%
HYPE $59.79 -2.75%
AAVE $89.79 -2.05%
SUI $0.7386 -0.84%
XLM $0.1850 +0.20%
ZEC $545.49 +1.95%
BTC $63,872.69 -0.12%
ETH $1,839.20 -1.51%
BNB $567.01 -1.24%
XRP $1.08 -0.62%
SOL $75.03 -0.80%
TRX $0.3227 -0.11%
DOGE $0.0724 -0.25%
ADA $0.1678 +3.85%
BCH $219.05 -2.08%
LINK $8.24 -1.29%
HYPE $59.79 -2.75%
AAVE $89.79 -2.05%
SUI $0.7386 -0.84%
XLM $0.1850 +0.20%
ZEC $545.49 +1.95%

ZachXBT: WLFI should carefully label high-risk addresses, as false positives can cause irreparable damage to reputation

2025-09-07 17:44:21
Collection

ChainCatcher message, "on-chain detective" ZachXBT posted on the X platform: "Sometimes so-called high-risk addresses may be incorrect, so the WLFI team cannot simply rely on compliance tools. Recently, I helped a team manually review the addresses of a presale, and after manual review, it was found that certain exchanges/smart contracts were incorrectly labeled as high risk. In many cases, even top compliance tools have significant flaws. I am glad to see that the World Liberty Financial team has taken a more proactive approach than other teams like Circle, as this will ultimately benefit the victims, but they do need to be cautious; otherwise, if false positives are blacklisted, it could cause irreparable damage to their reputation. The difficult part is finding the balance, and if the address is indeed a false positive, I hope the issue can be resolved quickly."

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.