BTC $80,519.53 +2.61%
ETH $2,521.46 +2.42%
BNB $711.09 +1.66%
XRP $1.46 +5.42%
SOL $108.23 +11.76%
TRX $0.3379 +0.81%
DOGE $0.0891 +5.09%
ADA $0.2159 +5.15%
BCH $270.92 +3.59%
LINK $11.91 +5.91%
HYPE $85.72 +6.36%
AAVE $129.07 +4.75%
SUI $0.7830 +6.27%
XLM $0.1881 +4.67%
ZEC $822.68 +5.82%
BTC $80,519.53 +2.61%
ETH $2,521.46 +2.42%
BNB $711.09 +1.66%
XRP $1.46 +5.42%
SOL $108.23 +11.76%
TRX $0.3379 +0.81%
DOGE $0.0891 +5.09%
ADA $0.2159 +5.15%
BCH $270.92 +3.59%
LINK $11.91 +5.91%
HYPE $85.72 +6.36%
AAVE $129.07 +4.75%
SUI $0.7830 +6.27%
XLM $0.1881 +4.67%
ZEC $822.68 +5.82%
first_img

CFTC acknowledges that it should not sue Gemini and jointly requests the court to withdraw the consent order

2026-05-28 10:12:12

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced on Tuesday that it has jointly filed a motion with Gemini Trust Company LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, requesting the dismissal of a previous judgment against Gemini.

The case was originally filed in June 2022, and the parties reached a consent order in January 2025. After a comprehensive review, the CFTC concluded that the lawsuit should not have been filed and would not be filed under current enforcement standards.

The review identified six major issues: the complaint was primarily based on statements from a whistleblower of questionable credibility; the investigation targeted Gemini as a victim of fraud rather than the alleged fraudster; there were serious doubts about the strength of the evidence against Gemini; relevant supporting materials were concealed and not submitted to the commissioners during the CFTC's vote on the complaint; the litigation team invoked deliberative process privilege to prevent Gemini from obtaining evidence necessary for its defense; and personnel improperly used CFTC regulatory power to create leverage for settlement.

The CFTC determined that continuing to enforce the forward-looking provisions of the consent order is neither consistent with its mission nor in the public interest, and that the non-forward-looking provisions of the consent order (such as civil penalties) have been fulfilled. The parties jointly request the court to vacate the remaining forward-looking provisions.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.