Scan to download
BTC $73,857.11 -2.48%
ETH $1,981.75 -4.42%
BNB $642.79 -1.93%
XRP $1.29 -3.04%
SOL $81.14 -3.10%
TRX $0.3669 -1.70%
DOGE $0.0990 -2.26%
ADA $0.2349 -2.14%
BCH $334.60 -2.69%
LINK $9.02 -4.20%
HYPE $57.93 -4.54%
AAVE $81.86 -4.52%
SUI $0.9469 -5.56%
XLM $0.1727 +16.96%
ZEC $538.94 -4.96%
BTC $73,857.11 -2.48%
ETH $1,981.75 -4.42%
BNB $642.79 -1.93%
XRP $1.29 -3.04%
SOL $81.14 -3.10%
TRX $0.3669 -1.70%
DOGE $0.0990 -2.26%
ADA $0.2349 -2.14%
BCH $334.60 -2.69%
LINK $9.02 -4.20%
HYPE $57.93 -4.54%
AAVE $81.86 -4.52%
SUI $0.9469 -5.56%
XLM $0.1727 +16.96%
ZEC $538.94 -4.96%
first_img

CFTC acknowledges that it should not sue Gemini and jointly requests the court to withdraw the consent order

2026-05-28 10:12:12
Collection

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced on Tuesday that it has jointly filed a motion with Gemini Trust Company LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, requesting the dismissal of a previous judgment against Gemini.

The case was originally filed in June 2022, and the parties reached a consent order in January 2025. After a comprehensive review, the CFTC concluded that the lawsuit should not have been filed and would not be filed under current enforcement standards.

The review identified six major issues: the complaint was primarily based on statements from a whistleblower of questionable credibility; the investigation targeted Gemini as a victim of fraud rather than the alleged fraudster; there were serious doubts about the strength of the evidence against Gemini; relevant supporting materials were concealed and not submitted to the commissioners during the CFTC's vote on the complaint; the litigation team invoked deliberative process privilege to prevent Gemini from obtaining evidence necessary for its defense; and personnel improperly used CFTC regulatory power to create leverage for settlement.

The CFTC determined that continuing to enforce the forward-looking provisions of the consent order is neither consistent with its mission nor in the public interest, and that the non-forward-looking provisions of the consent order (such as civil penalties) have been fulfilled. The parties jointly request the court to vacate the remaining forward-looking provisions.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.