Scan to download
BTC $66,985.96 -4.11%
ETH $1,872.56 -5.42%
BNB $640.89 -6.12%
XRP $1.24 -2.13%
SOL $74.84 -5.92%
TRX $0.3328 -2.29%
DOGE $0.0937 -5.43%
ADA $0.2160 -3.41%
BCH $250.97 -12.39%
LINK $8.51 -3.70%
HYPE $72.22 +1.11%
AAVE $75.80 -2.48%
SUI $0.8319 -1.96%
XLM $0.2306 +1.08%
ZEC $618.70 +11.31%
BTC $66,985.96 -4.11%
ETH $1,872.56 -5.42%
BNB $640.89 -6.12%
XRP $1.24 -2.13%
SOL $74.84 -5.92%
TRX $0.3328 -2.29%
DOGE $0.0937 -5.43%
ADA $0.2160 -3.41%
BCH $250.97 -12.39%
LINK $8.51 -3.70%
HYPE $72.22 +1.11%
AAVE $75.80 -2.48%
SUI $0.8319 -1.96%
XLM $0.2306 +1.08%
ZEC $618.70 +11.31%

The Qingdao procuratorate clarifies the property nature of virtual currency in a case involving the theft of 107 bitcoins

2026-06-03 15:20:56
Collection

According to Shandong Legal News, a Bitcoin theft case prosecuted by the Li Cang District Prosecutor's Office in Qingdao has been sentenced. The defendant, Zhang, was sentenced to 10 years and 9 months in prison for theft and fined 100,000 yuan.

In the early hours of a certain day in 2024, the virtual currency wallet of the victim, Feng, was quietly accessed, and 107 Bitcoins were transferred, equivalent to over 22.54 million yuan at the market price on that day. It was found that Feng had entrusted an acquaintance, Zhang, to assist with the operation. During the process of registering the wallet on behalf of Feng, Zhang obtained the mnemonic phrase, and after multiple attempts in the early morning, he cracked the wallet and transferred the Bitcoins. After being apprehended, Zhang claimed that his actions were a "protective takeover" to prevent the Bitcoins from being stolen by others. The prosecution traced the funds and found that the stolen Bitcoins were transferred multiple times and exchanged for over 660,000 yuan, exposing his lies.

The prosecution determined that Bitcoin has economic value and exclusive control, meeting the core characteristics of "property" in criminal law, and can be the object of theft. The actual proceeds from the sale of the stolen Bitcoins, amounting to over 660,000 yuan, were used as the basis for the theft amount. After the defendant appealed, in November 2025, the Qingdao Intermediate People's Court ruled to dismiss the appeal and upheld the original sentence. This case is a typical example of Qingdao's legal punishment of crimes in the virtual currency field, clearly conveying the judicial stance: activities related to virtual currency must be conducted within the legal framework, and stealing others' virtual property also constitutes a crime.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.