Classification is not decoration; it determines the boundaries of comparison

The types of products covered by "tokenized assets" are very broad. If we do not define the categories first, the issuance methods and trading data of stocks, funds, government bonds, commodities, or other assets may be mixed into the same conclusion. The role of the label map is to outline the boundaries of what can be compared and what should not be directly compared.

Organized by Asset, Structure, and Market Layers

The asset layer answers what the reference asset is; the structure layer answers who issues it and in what product form; the market layer answers where it can be seen on which chain or trading venues. The three layers are parallel, allowing us to distinguish between "the existence of a certain asset" and "how it is structured and where it is observed."

Allow an Asset to Have Multiple Labels

The same product may simultaneously belong to a certain asset category, a certain issuer system, and multiple market entrances. Allowing multiple labels is closer to the real world than enforcing a single choice, but each label must have a definition and source to avoid labels becoming marketing language.

Make Classification Versions Traceable

New products, issuers, and market entrances will emerge, and old labels may also need to be revised. The classification page should retain update times, version descriptions, and items to be confirmed to prevent historical articles from referencing outdated classification logic.

Conclusion

To further browse the structured data and market information of tokenized assets, please visit RootData: https://www.rootdata.com/tokenized-assets