1099-da

Coinbase stated that the IRS's newly introduced digital asset tax reporting form 1099-DA rules are overly complicated and may impose unnecessary administrative burdens on a large number of cryptocurrency holders.Coinbase's Vice President of Tax, Lawrence Zlatkin, pointed out that the new regulations require reporting small transactions such as stablecoin trades and network gas fees, while stablecoins themselves have relatively stable prices and gas fees are usually only a few dollars or even lower. Reporting such information could lead to "over-reporting" in the system, making the tax framework more complex.It is reported that Coinbase is currently sending 1099-DA forms to millions of users in the U.S. This system requires trading platforms to report users' digital asset transactions to the IRS and provide users with a copy for their own reporting of gains and losses. However, in this year's reporting, Coinbase will only report the total gross proceeds from digital asset sales to the IRS and will not provide the cost basis, requiring users to calculate their actual taxable gains themselves. This may lead to confusion among some investors, and Coinbase plans to calculate the cost basis for users starting from the next tax year to simplify the reporting process.

ChainCatcher news, according to CoinDesk, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released an updated draft version of tax form 1099-DA for cryptocurrency brokers and investors to report certain transaction gains yesterday, giving the public 30 days to provide feedback to the IRS on this version.Starting in 2026, cryptocurrency investors using brokers (currently mainly referring to CEXs like Coinbase and Kraken) will receive 1099-DA forms from these brokers to report certain cryptocurrency sales and transactions to the IRS as taxable events. IRS officials stated that this form will "bring more convenience and clarity" to users paying U.S. crypto taxes.The newly released version of 1099-DA is more streamlined than the initial draft of the tax form proposed by the IRS in April. The requirement for investors to fill in wallet addresses and transaction IDs has been removed (which had previously raised privacy concerns when the form was first published), and it is no longer necessary to provide the time of the related transactions, only the date.Drew Hinkes, a partner at Miami law firm K&L Gates and a cryptocurrency lawyer, commented that the updated form "has seen significant improvements, reducing the reporting burden and greatly decreasing the amount of data required."

ChainCatcher message, a16z crypto recently commented on the IRS's draft of the 1099-DA form, with the following key points:Each digital asset transaction requires multiple brokers to submit the 1099-DA form, resulting in unnecessary duplicate information reporting and placing an unreasonable burden on filers;The requirement for brokers to report wallet addresses is unnecessary and puts sensitive taxpayer information at significant risk;The cost of providing the information required by the 1099-DA form is too high, and in some cases, it is even unattainable;The final regulations should delay or "phase in" the effective date of digital asset information reporting requirements;Non-custodial wallets and digital asset payment processors should be removed from the "broker" category listed in the 1099-DA form;The IRS should not require the submission of the 1099-DA form when disposing of fiat-backed stablecoins and most NFTs (non-fungible tokens);The requirement to submit the 1099-DA form should include a minimum threshold, allowing brokers to aggregate transactions for reporting purposes.