Viola

Jack Dorsey's Block reaches a $40 million settlement with New York regulators over anti-money laundering violations

ChainCatcher news, according to The Block, Jack Dorsey's payment company Block, Inc. has reached a $40 million settlement with New York state financial regulators due to anti-money laundering violations.The consent order released by the New York State Department of Financial Services on Thursday stated that the investigation found that the fintech company, formerly known as Square, "failed to adequately consider the significant risks posed by the scale and complexity of its business" in its anti-money laundering program when providing Bitcoin services through Cash App.Regulators specifically pointed out three major vulnerabilities at Block: a lack of risk-based anti-money laundering controls, insufficient customer due diligence, and lax handling of high-risk Bitcoin transactions that led to a large number of anonymous transactions going unchecked. This is the second time this year that Block has paid a settlement due to anti-money laundering issues. In January, the company paid $80 million to financial regulators in 48 states.A Block spokesperson stated that this settlement marks the resolution of all state-level remittance license matters and emphasized that while the company did not admit to the findings of the investigation, it has invested significant resources to improve the compliance framework of Cash App. Under the agreement, Block must hire an independent monitor to implement corrective actions.

Sun Yuchen released the "Seven Deadly Sins" of FDT, including violation of fiduciary duty, abuse of client funds, and more

ChainCatcher message, Sun Yuchen published the "Seven Deadly Sins" of First Digital Trust (FDT) on social media, including: violation of fiduciary duty, misuse of client funds, unlicensed investment activities, fraud or theft, false reporting or concealment of information, violation of anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, violation of Hong Kong POBO regulations. The details are as follows:Crime 1: Violation of Fiduciary DutyAccording to the Hong Kong Trust Ordinance (Chapter 29), trustees must act with care, diligence, and loyalty. Misappropriation of client funds violates Section 4 (reasonable care obligation) and the principles of trust. Clearly, FDT will bear liability for compensation and damages in civil litigation.Crime 2: Misuse of Client FundsThe Securities and Futures (Client Money) Rules (Chapter 571) stipulate that custodial funds must not be used for the custodian's own purposes. Client assets must be held in segregated accounts, and unauthorized withdrawals are strictly prohibited. By transferring TUSD funds to ARIA DMCC without proper authorization, FDT faces enforcement actions, including fines, revocation of licenses, or criminal prosecution.Crime 3: Unlicensed Investment ActivitiesAlthough FDT is registered as a Trust or Company Service Provider (TCSP), it has no SFC license to conduct regulated activities on behalf of clients. Its so-called investment activities involving TUSD assets at ARIA directly violate the provisions of the Securities and Futures Ordinance, which prohibits engaging in regulated activities without a license.Crime 4: Fraud or TheftMisappropriation of funds with the intent to deceive clients constitutes fraud or theft. FDT conspired with accomplices (such as Aria CFF, Truecoin (Alex De Lorraine), Crossbridge/Finaport (Yai Sukonthabhund)) to cover up the misappropriation by falsifying records and claiming to have made false investments.Crime 5: False Reporting or Concealment of InformationTo cover up misappropriation or unauthorized transactions, FDT provided false statements and fraudulent documents, claiming that TUSD funds were intact and invested as instructed. This violates Section 300 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (using fraudulent or deceptive means in securities transactions).Crime 6: Violation of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) RegulationsBy transferring misappropriated funds through complex transactions or offshore accounts to conceal their source, FDT facilitated and/or constituted a violation of anti-money laundering regulations.Crime 7: Prevention of Bribery Ordinance (POBO)The Prevention of Bribery Ordinance is the primary legislation in Hong Kong governing secret commissions. It criminalizes corrupt transactions, including agents receiving undisclosed benefits or commissions without the principal's consent. FDT/Legacy, under the direction of Vincent Chok, received secret kickbacks from DMCC in exchange for the illegal transfer of TUSD custodial funds.

Sun Yuchen: First Digital Trust has had negative net assets for three consecutive years and is suspected of violating the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Ordinance

ChainCatcher news, Sun Yuchen once again accused FDT of fraud. He stated: First Digital Trust (FDT) openly disregards all fiduciary duties and regulatory norms, claiming to represent Techteryx in managing a securities portfolio of up to $501.8 million for the Aria Commodity Finance Fund in its own legal name. According to the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO), any individual or company providing securities portfolio management services must hold a Type 9 license from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, unless the service is limited to its wholly-owned subsidiaries or provided by its 100% owned parent company. Clearly, FDT is not only ignoring the fundamental principles of the trust industry but is also openly contemptuous of Hong Kong's banking and investment laws. In other words, its actions have completely disregarded Hong Kong's regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies.Furthermore, Sun Yuchen believes that FDT has not only fallen into negative assets but has also had negative net assets for three consecutive years. By the end of 2024, its net assets are projected to be negative HKD 100 million. This does not include the massive losses caused by its large-scale misappropriation of user assets. Even so, it can still publicly manage billions of dollars in public assets in the market today.Previously, First Digital responded: it will take legal action against Sun Yuchen's "slanderous behavior."
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators