Scan to download
BTC $68,237.86 +2.10%
ETH $1,968.14 +0.20%
BNB $614.79 +1.31%
XRP $1.42 -4.56%
SOL $81.67 -4.53%
TRX $0.2795 -0.47%
DOGE $0.0974 -3.83%
ADA $0.2735 -4.22%
BCH $555.47 +1.34%
LINK $8.64 -2.97%
HYPE $28.98 -1.81%
AAVE $122.61 -3.42%
SUI $0.9138 -6.63%
XLM $0.1605 -4.62%
ZEC $260.31 -8.86%
BTC $68,237.86 +2.10%
ETH $1,968.14 +0.20%
BNB $614.79 +1.31%
XRP $1.42 -4.56%
SOL $81.67 -4.53%
TRX $0.2795 -0.47%
DOGE $0.0974 -3.83%
ADA $0.2735 -4.22%
BCH $555.47 +1.34%
LINK $8.64 -2.97%
HYPE $28.98 -1.81%
AAVE $122.61 -3.42%
SUI $0.9138 -6.63%
XLM $0.1605 -4.62%
ZEC $260.31 -8.86%

opinion

Opinion: The recent lawsuit outcome of Polymarket will determine the regulatory jurisdiction of prediction markets in the United States

Recent federal litigation by Polymarket against Massachusetts may determine whether the regulation of prediction markets in the United States falls under federal or state jurisdiction. Polymarket argues in the lawsuit that Congress has granted exclusive regulatory authority over "event contracts" (prediction markets for sports, politics, etc.) to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and therefore state governments do not have the power to independently prohibit or regulate these platforms.The lawsuit aims to prevent Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell from potential enforcement actions, following a preliminary injunction issued by the state court against Polymarket's competitor Kalshi, which determined that its sports-related contracts constituted unlicensed sports betting. The regulatory conflict between the federal government and the states is intensifying, with prediction market platforms claiming they are regulated as derivatives markets by the CFTC and can operate nationwide, while states like Massachusetts and Nevada view them as a "sports betting loophole" that circumvents state gambling laws, leading to multiple lawsuits and injunctions.The outcome of Polymarket's appeal could reshape the regulatory framework for prediction markets in the United States, determining whether these platforms can operate free from state gambling law restrictions or must comply with varying rules across states, and it may ultimately be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Japan's financial regulatory agency has publicly sought opinions on the regulation of digital payments and cryptocurrencies

According to market news, the Financial Services Agency of Japan has opened a public consultation on the draft implementation guidelines involving cryptocurrencies, electronic payment tools, and financial institutions. The draft clarifies the specific execution requirements following the amendment of the Payment Services Act in 2025, including updates to official announcements, administrative guidelines, and regulatory rules.The draft covers multiple areas, including the designation of newly added bonds as supporting assets, the regulatory framework for electronic payment tools and cryptocurrency-related intermediary services, as well as updated regulatory guidelines for financial institutions and their subsidiaries. This consultation will end on February 27, 2026, after which the regulations will come into effect following the completion of necessary procedures, and the results of the consultation will be announced separately.It is reported that the Financial Services Agency of Japan is planning a comprehensive adjustment of the regulatory framework, aiming to launch the country's first spot cryptocurrency ETFs by 2028. The roadmap includes reclassifying cryptocurrencies as "specific assets" under the Investment Trust Act, promoting a reduction of the cryptocurrency capital gains tax from a maximum of 55% to a uniform 20%, and allowing time to strengthen custody and investor protection standards.

Opinion: The U.S. Senate's delay on the cryptocurrency market structure bill increases regulatory uncertainty, putting pressure on related assets

Galaxy Digital's research director Alex Thorn stated that the U.S. Senate Banking Committee's originally scheduled hearing on the cryptocurrency market structure bill has been postponed, highlighting the deep divisions between Congress and the industry on several key issues, particularly focusing on stablecoin yield mechanisms and DeFi-related provisions. This delay occurred just hours after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong withdrew his support for the bill. Armstrong publicly opposed the bill's references to tokenized securities, DeFi restrictions, and stablecoin yields. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott subsequently announced the postponement of the hearing, but no new timeline has been provided. With the Senate set to recess next week, the earliest possible restart could be between January 26 and 30.Alex Thorn pointed out that within just 48 hours, the bill draft was released late at night, over 100 amendments were submitted, and stakeholders continued to discover new points of contention at the last minute, significantly increasing the difficulty of political coordination. On the market side, following the announcement of the delay, cryptocurrency assets generally declined, with Bitcoin and Ethereum dropping about 2% on the day; related U.S. stocks also faced pressure, with Coinbase down 6.5%, Robinhood down 7.8%, and Circle down 9.7%. In his analysis, Thorn believes that although there is a broad consensus on "market structure" itself, non-core but highly sensitive issues surrounding stablecoin yields, DeFi compliance, and granting the SEC regulatory tools in the area of tokenized securities have created an insurmountable political divide. "The apparent gap in disagreements is not large, but the substantive chasm is deep."

The U.S. prosecution opposes adopting the opinion letter from the DeFi Education Fund, and the Ethereum MEV case may be re-examined

The U.S. prosecution has submitted a letter to the Southern District of New York Federal Court opposing the court's acceptance of the amicus brief submitted by the digital asset advocacy organization DeFi Education Fund while considering whether to re-examine a case related to Ethereum MEV.U.S. Acting Attorney Jay Clayton stated in a document addressed to Judge Jessica Clarke that the brief "is detached from the trial record and merely reiterates legal arguments previously rejected by the court," and should not be accepted. The case involves brothers Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, who are accused of exploiting approximately $25 million through automated MEV bots on Ethereum. In November, the court declared a mistrial after the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict on guilt or innocence. Subsequently, the U.S. government requested the court to schedule a retrial as soon as possible in late February or early March 2026.According to the draft brief submitted by DEF on December 19, the organization supports the dismissal of the case or a not guilty verdict, arguing that such prosecutions create uncertainty and fear for DeFi developers, potentially stifling industry innovation and driving participants away. The prosecution, however, contends that these views do not provide new legal grounds. The direction of the case remains unclear. If the brothers are found guilty of the same charges in the retrial, they could face up to 20 years in prison for each count. The outcome of the case is also seen within the industry as having significant implications for MEV behavior and the related compliance boundaries.

Opinion: The outlook for most crypto treasury companies is bleak before 2026, and flagship DAT will also fall into crisis

According to Cointelegraph, several industry executives have stated that as the market environment weakens, Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies face severe challenges as they approach 2026, and a large-scale liquidation may occur in the industry. Altan Tutar, co-founder and CEO of MoreMarkets, pointed out that a large number of DAT companies emerged in 2025, providing Wall Street investors with exposure to crypto assets, but after the market correction, many companies' stock prices have significantly declined, and the overall outlook has become bleak.Tutar believes that with increasing competition, most crypto treasury companies will struggle to survive, particularly those focused on altcoins, which may be the first to exit the market, as their market capitalization is unlikely to remain above the net asset value (mNAV) of the crypto assets they hold in the long term. He also mentioned that even treasuries built around mainstream assets like Ethereum, Solana, or XRP may face similar pressures later on.Ryan Chow, co-founder of Solv Protocol, added that the number of publicly listed or quasi-listed companies holding Bitcoin surged in 2025, but "simply holding Bitcoin is not a sustainable growth model," and companies lacking revenue management capabilities may struggle to endure the next downturn. He pointed out that the treasury companies that survive often view crypto assets as digital capital that can generate revenue and liquidity, rather than merely a store of value.Additionally, Vincent Chok, CEO of First Digital, stated that crypto ETFs are becoming significant competitors to DATs, as they can provide investors with a more compliant and transparent price exposure. He believes that for the crypto treasury model to continue to develop, it needs to integrate more deeply with traditional financial infrastructure, approaching ETF standards in terms of compliance, auditing, and asset management.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.