BTC $78,976.72 -0.90%
ETH $2,479.31 -0.14%
BNB $739.57 -1.06%
XRP $1.39 -1.31%
SOL $103.72 -2.33%
TRX $0.3340 -0.38%
DOGE $0.0900 +0.95%
ADA $0.2208 +1.02%
BCH $267.17 +4.07%
LINK $12.92 +4.78%
HYPE $85.47 -3.19%
AAVE $132.00 -1.02%
SUI $0.8137 +1.47%
XLM $0.1923 +4.21%
ZEC $1,155.81 -1.96%
BTC $78,976.72 -0.90%
ETH $2,479.31 -0.14%
BNB $739.57 -1.06%
XRP $1.39 -1.31%
SOL $103.72 -2.33%
TRX $0.3340 -0.38%
DOGE $0.0900 +0.95%
ADA $0.2208 +1.02%
BCH $267.17 +4.07%
LINK $12.92 +4.78%
HYPE $85.47 -3.19%
AAVE $132.00 -1.02%
SUI $0.8137 +1.47%
XLM $0.1923 +4.21%
ZEC $1,155.81 -1.96%

Vitalik: For an L2-centric ecosystem to succeed, it is essential to understand and address challenges such as coordination

2024-05-23 13:04:33

ChainCatcher message, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated that Layer 2 and sharding are often described as two opposing strategies for blockchain scalability in public discussions. However, when you delve into the underlying technology, a puzzle emerges: the actual scaling methods are completely the same. Both have some form of data sharding, both have fraud proofs or ZK-SNARK proofs, and both have methods to solve cross {rollup, shard} communication. The main difference lies in who is responsible for building and updating these components, and how much autonomy they possess.

A Layer 2-centric ecosystem technically realizes sharding very effectively, but it is a sharding that can create its own rules. This is very powerful and can inspire a great deal of creativity and independent innovation. However, it also presents key challenges, especially in terms of coordination. For a Layer 2-centric ecosystem like Ethereum to succeed, it needs to understand these challenges and address them head-on to gain as many advantages as possible from a Layer 1-centric ecosystem while getting as close as possible to having the best features of both.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.