Web3 VC metrics reorganized, a quick insight into which VC's invested projects can go public?

Author: Evan, @EvanCrypto17

Spend another 24 hours organizing, striving for perfection! Hope everyone can refer to more detailed and comprehensive content!

In the last issue, we only selected three exchanges: Binance, OKX, and Coinbase. This time we updated the listing rates for Bybit and Upbit, improving the indicators for better statistical results.

In this issue, we updated:

• Unaccounted VC

• Added Bybit listing rate

• Added Upbit listing rate

• VC average listing rate

• Excellent VC evaluation

• More objective quantitative scores

• More intuitive UI interface

A total of 73 VCs were selected, including 35 domestic VCs, 30 foreign VCs, and 8 exchange VCs.

[Advance Statement]: This rating is based solely on the listing of tokens and does not involve the comprehensive strength and brand influence of VCs.

Based on the market share/growth rate/listing effect of Binance/Coinbase/OKX/Bybit/Upbit exchanges, the conclusions are as follows:

T0 Level: Continue Capital, Placeholder, YZi Labs (Binance Labs)

T1 Level: IOSG Ventures, Hack VC, Bain Capital Ventures, Mint Ventures

T2 Level: Paradigm, Sequoia China, Sequoia Capital, Multicoin, Polychain, etc.

T3 Level: a16z, Dragonfly, Coinbase Ventures, 1kx, etc.

T4 Level: Circle Ventures, Hashkey Capital, DCG, Bankless Ventures, etc.

T5 Level: Hash Global, Haun Venture, BTX Capital, Incuba Alpha

Based on VC regional ranking, the conclusion is: Foreign VCs > Exchange VCs > Domestic VCs

Based on the average level of VC token listings:

31 "excellent" VCs are above the average level for better reference, see the details in the chart.

Detailed data for each VC can be found in the Thread.