BTC $79,062.03 -1.44%
ETH $2,484.71 -1.41%
BNB $738.93 -1.75%
XRP $1.39 -2.12%
SOL $103.72 -2.24%
TRX $0.3343 -0.25%
DOGE $0.0909 -0.06%
ADA $0.2205 -1.90%
BCH $258.50 -1.00%
LINK $12.73 -4.14%
HYPE $84.75 -3.47%
AAVE $131.99 -2.99%
SUI $0.8192 -0.13%
XLM $0.1923 +2.35%
ZEC $1,134.46 -5.89%
BTC $79,062.03 -1.44%
ETH $2,484.71 -1.41%
BNB $738.93 -1.75%
XRP $1.39 -2.12%
SOL $103.72 -2.24%
TRX $0.3343 -0.25%
DOGE $0.0909 -0.06%
ADA $0.2205 -1.90%
BCH $258.50 -1.00%
LINK $12.73 -4.14%
HYPE $84.75 -3.47%
AAVE $131.99 -2.99%
SUI $0.8192 -0.13%
XLM $0.1923 +2.35%
ZEC $1,134.46 -5.89%

oppose

Tất cả
Bài viết
Tin nhanh

The South Korean cryptocurrency industry collectively opposes the new anti-money laundering regulations, planning to require all overseas transfers of over 10 million won to be reported as suspicious transactions

According to Cointelegraph, the South Korean crypto industry group DAXA (Digital Asset Exchange Alliance), representing 27 registered virtual asset service providers (VASP), has submitted objections to the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) regarding the proposed amendments to the implementation order of the Specific Financial Information Act.The new regulations aim to require domestic VASPs to report any virtual asset transfers with foreign VASPs as suspicious transaction reports (STR) if the amount reaches 10 million won (approximately $6,800), regardless of the risk level. DAXA warned that this would cause the annual reporting volume of South Korea's five major trading platforms (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, Gopax) to surge from about 63,000 last year to over 5.4 million, making compliance practically impossible.The industry also opposes the proposed requirement to verify the accuracy of customer information, arguing that the subordinate rules impose obligations not clearly defined by law. This industry backlash comes as exchanges face sanctions from financial regulators in court. On April 9, the court ruled to lift part of the business suspension against Upbit operator Dunamu, but the regulators have appealed. On April 30, the court suspended the six-month partial business suspension against Bithumb. Coinone also received a temporary stay of execution.The public consultation period for the new regulations ends on May 11, and it is expected to be finalized in July after regulatory and legal reviews. This highlights the tension between South Korea's tightening of crypto anti-money laundering regulations and the industry's concerns about excessive compliance burdens.

The U.S. prosecution opposes adopting the opinion letter from the DeFi Education Fund, and the Ethereum MEV case may be re-examined

The U.S. prosecution has submitted a letter to the Southern District of New York Federal Court opposing the court's acceptance of the amicus brief submitted by the digital asset advocacy organization DeFi Education Fund while considering whether to re-examine a case related to Ethereum MEV.U.S. Acting Attorney Jay Clayton stated in a document addressed to Judge Jessica Clarke that the brief "is detached from the trial record and merely reiterates legal arguments previously rejected by the court," and should not be accepted. The case involves brothers Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, who are accused of exploiting approximately $25 million through automated MEV bots on Ethereum. In November, the court declared a mistrial after the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict on guilt or innocence. Subsequently, the U.S. government requested the court to schedule a retrial as soon as possible in late February or early March 2026.According to the draft brief submitted by DEF on December 19, the organization supports the dismissal of the case or a not guilty verdict, arguing that such prosecutions create uncertainty and fear for DeFi developers, potentially stifling industry innovation and driving participants away. The prosecution, however, contends that these views do not provide new legal grounds. The direction of the case remains unclear. If the brothers are found guilty of the same charges in the retrial, they could face up to 20 years in prison for each count. The outcome of the case is also seen within the industry as having significant implications for MEV behavior and the related compliance boundaries.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.