Coinbase Monthly Outlook: Bitcoin and COIN50 Both Fall Below Key Support, How Far Is the Market from a Rebound?
Original Title: ++Monthly Outlook: How Do You Define a Crypto Bear Market?++
Original Author: David Duong, CFA - Global Head of Research
Compiled by: Daisy, ChainCatcher
Key Takeaways:
- As of mid-April, the total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies, excluding Bitcoin, has fallen from a peak of $1.6 trillion in December 2024 to $950 billion, a decline of 41%. Additionally, venture capital investment has decreased by 50% to 60% compared to the levels of 2021-2022.
- We believe a conservative risk management strategy should be adopted at this stage. However, we expect cryptocurrency market prices may stabilize in the latter half of the second quarter of 2025, laying the groundwork for a rebound in the third quarter.
Overview
Multiple factors are converging, potentially signaling the onset of a new "crypto winter." With global tariff policies being introduced and possibly escalating further, market sentiment has significantly deteriorated. As of mid-April, the total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies, excluding Bitcoin, has dropped to $950 billion, down 41% from the $1.6 trillion peak in December 2024, representing a year-on-year decline of 17%. Notably, this level is even lower than the market performance during almost the entire period from August 2021 to April 2022.
In the first quarter of 2025, venture capital in the crypto industry rebounded slightly compared to the previous quarter, but it remains 50% to 60% lower than the peak levels of 2021 to 2022. This significantly restricts new capital from entering the ecosystem, particularly impacting the altcoin sector. The structural pressures mentioned above primarily stem from the current macroeconomic uncertainties. Fiscal tightening and tariff policies continue to suppress traditional risk assets, leading to a stagnation in investment decisions. Although the regulatory environment provides some support, the recovery path for the crypto market remains challenging against the backdrop of an overall weak stock market.
The interplay of multiple factors presents a severe cyclical outlook for the digital asset market, necessitating caution in the short term (expected over the next 4 to 6 weeks). However, we believe investors should adopt flexible tactics to respond to market fluctuations. Once market sentiment is restored, a rebound could be initiated swiftly. We remain optimistic about market performance in the second half of 2025.
Defining Bull and Bear Markets
In the stock market, a common empirical standard for determining a bull or bear market is a rise of 20% from recent lows or a drop of 20% from highs. However, this standard is inherently subjective and does not apply to the highly volatile crypto market. Crypto assets frequently experience price fluctuations of over 20% in a short period, but this does not necessarily indicate a fundamental change in market trends. Historical data shows that, for example, Bitcoin can drop 20% in a week while still being in a long-term upward trend, and vice versa.
Moreover, the crypto market operates 24/7, making it a barometer for global risk sentiment during traditional financial market closures (such as at night or on weekends). Therefore, cryptocurrency prices often react more strongly to global events. For instance, during the Federal Reserve's aggressive rate hike policy from January to November 2022, the U.S. stock market (represented by the S&P 500 index) fell a cumulative 22%; meanwhile, Bitcoin, which began its decline earlier in November 2021, saw a cumulative drop of 76% during the same period, approximately 3.5 times the decline of U.S. stocks.
The Truth in Contradiction
It should be noted that the "20% rule," traditionally used to define bull and bear markets, is essentially just a rule of thumb, and there is no unified standard to date. As U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart famously said when commenting on "what constitutes obscenity": "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it." Similarly, identifying market trends often relies more on experience and intuition than on strict computational models.
Nevertheless, to systematize our judgments, we refer to the closing price peaks and troughs of the S&P 500 index over a rolling one-year time window to identify key market reversals. According to this method, the U.S. stock market has roughly experienced four bull markets and two bear markets over the past decade—this does not include the latest downturn from late March to early April (our model has begun signaling a bear market). See Chart 1 for details.
However, the "20% threshold" also overlooks at least two significant events that impacted market sentiment but saw declines between 10% and 20%. For example, the volatility spike caused by the turmoil in the Chinese stock market at the end of 2015 and the market turbulence resulting from escalating global trade tensions in 2018 (as indicated by the Federal Reserve's global trade policy uncertainty index). See Chart 2 for details.
In the past, we have seen that sentiment-driven market declines often trigger defensive adjustments in portfolios, even if the declines do not reach the artificially set 20% threshold. In other words, we believe that a bear market is essentially a reflection of a structural change in the market, characterized by deteriorating fundamentals and liquidity contraction, rather than merely the magnitude of price declines. Additionally, the "20% rule" poses a risk of complacency, as it ignores early warning signals such as weakened market depth and rotation into defensive sectors, which are often precursors to significant downturn cycles in history.
Alternative Indicators
Therefore, we attempt to find alternative indicators that can more accurately reflect the relationship between price movements and investor sentiment, applicable to both stocks and crypto assets. The definition of a bear market involves not only asset returns but is also closely related to market sentiment—the latter often determines whether investors believe the downward trend will persist and adjust their strategies accordingly. This concept is complex, as we are not observing simple continuous rises or falls, but rather turning points in long-term trends. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic is a typical case where the market experienced a rapid and severe decline followed by a swift rebound. Of course, the brevity of this bear market was largely due to the massive fiscal and monetary stimulus policies introduced by governments, which prevented investors from falling into a prolonged drawdown.
Rather than relying on empirical rules like the "20% rule," we prefer to use two types of risk-adjusted indicators: (1) risk-adjusted returns measured by standard deviation; (2) the 200-day moving average (200DMA). For instance, from November 2021 to November 2022, Bitcoin's performance relative to the average of the previous 365 days declined by 1.4 standard deviations; during the same period, the U.S. stock market's decline also reached 1.3 standard deviations. From a risk-adjusted perspective, Bitcoin's 76% drop and the S&P 500's 22% drop can be considered roughly equivalent in magnitude.
Since the standard deviation indicator naturally reflects the high volatility of the crypto market, the z-score (standard score) is very suitable for crypto asset analysis. However, it also has certain limitations: on one hand, the calculations are relatively complex; on the other hand, during periods of stable market trends, there may be fewer signals, and the response to trend changes may not be sufficiently sensitive. For example, our model indicated that the recent bull market cycle ended in late February, after which the market state was classified as "neutral," reflecting potential lag in the model during periods of severe market volatility.
In contrast, the 200-day moving average (200DMA) provides a simpler and more robust method for identifying sustained market trends. Because it is based on long-term data, it effectively smooths short-term fluctuations and adjusts promptly according to the latest price movements, thereby providing clearer momentum signals.
The judgment method is also relatively intuitive:
- When prices consistently remain above the 200DMA with upward momentum, it is typically regarded as a bull market;
- When prices remain below the 200DMA for an extended period with downward momentum, it often indicates the formation of a bear market.
This method not only aligns with the broad trend signals reflected by the "20% rule" and z-score models but also enhances the practicality and foresight of insights in a dynamic market environment. For example, it successfully captured key downturn cycles such as the early pandemic in 2020 and the Federal Reserve's rate hike cycle from 2022 to 2023, while also reflecting the crypto winter of 2018 to 2019 and the pullback triggered by China's mining ban in 2021.
In our view, this method not only aligns with the broad trend signals reflected in the "20% rule" and z-score models but also improves the precision of extracting actionable insights in a dynamic market environment.
Additionally, we have found that the 200DMA better reflects the dramatic fluctuations in investor sentiment across different periods. See Chart 5 and Chart 6 for details.
Crypto Winter?
So, have we entered a crypto bear market? Previous analyses have primarily focused on Bitcoin, as it has sufficient historical data to compare with traditional markets like the U.S. stock market. However, as the category of crypto assets continues to expand into emerging areas (such as meme coins, DeFi, DePIN, AI agents, etc.), Bitcoin is gradually becoming less representative of the overall market trend.
For example, Bitcoin's 200DMA model indicates that since late March, its sharp pullback has entered bear market territory. Analyzing the same model on the COIN50 index (which covers the top 50 tokens by market capitalization) reveals that since the end of February, this category of assets has clearly been in a bear market. This aligns with the trend of the total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies, excluding Bitcoin, which has fallen 41% from its December 2024 peak to $950 billion; in contrast, Bitcoin's decline during the same period has been less than 20%. This gap reflects the higher volatility and risk premium of altcoins at the end of the risk curve.
Conclusion
As Bitcoin's "store of value" attribute continues to strengthen, we believe that a more systematic and comprehensive approach is needed to assess the overall performance of the crypto market in order to more accurately define its bull or bear market status, especially in the context of an increasingly diverse asset class. Nevertheless, both Bitcoin and the COIN50 index have fallen below their respective 200-day moving averages, signaling that the market may be in the early stages of a long-term downtrend. This aligns with the trends of declining total market capitalization and shrinking venture capital, both of which are important characteristics that may indicate the onset of a "crypto winter."
Therefore, we recommend maintaining a defensive risk management strategy at this stage. Although we still expect cryptocurrency prices to stabilize in the latter half of the second quarter of 2025, laying the groundwork for improvements in the third quarter, the complex macro environment still requires investors to remain highly cautious.