Bitcoin ETFs face selling pressure, but it is not a bear market yet

Market Background: Is the Trend Fading or a Necessary Adjustment?

In the past few weeks, anyone who has paid even slight attention to the cryptocurrency market may have noticed a clear trend: weakness. The chart trends have flattened, momentum has faded, and market sentiment has shifted from exuberance to caution. At first glance, the situation seems simple—"ETF funds are flowing out, and the market is declining." However, when viewed through a broader cyclical lens, the situation becomes more complex.

One of the main reasons for the current slowdown in Bitcoin prices is undoubtedly the outflow of funds from spot Bitcoin ETFs. Unlike the volatility driven by retail investors, the flow of ETF funds primarily comes from large asset allocators—family offices, pension funds, and institutional investors allocating capital across multiple global markets. In October, Bitcoin prices briefly touched the $120,000 range, followed by a significant drop in early November, which, from a traditional capital perspective, altered the risk-return balance. As safer investments like bonds returned and gold regained market dominance, some funds naturally withdrew from the Bitcoin market.

Despite these fluctuations, the market structure does not indicate the beginning of a new multi-year bear market. Instead, this trend resembles a mid-cycle adjustment—similar to the situation from January to April this year—rather than a market sentiment collapse seen during the actual bear market cycle from 2021 to 2023.

ETF Positions: The Most Important Signal Right Now

When evaluating ETF performance, two indicators are more important than any others:

• Total BTC held by ETFs (structural capital)

• Daily net inflow/outflow (short-term sentiment)

Overall, the first indicator shows a significant decline in total holdings towards the right side of the dataset. This change is significant because the operation of ETF funds is fundamentally different from the liquidity of short-term stablecoins. When institutions (especially asset management firms like BlackRock) purchase Bitcoin through ETFs, these holdings are typically custodied and effectively removed from the circulating supply. These purchases resemble long-term structural demand, which over time effectively raises the price floor of Bitcoin.

In contrast, stablecoin buyers are usually exchanges, market makers, or native cryptocurrency funds. Their funds are stored on-chain, waiting for market conditions to improve. They rotate, observe, and wait for opportunities, but rarely fully liquidate. This is why the market capitalization of stablecoins continues to grow while the proportion allocated to ETFs has declined.

Interestingly, by comparing the recent decline in ETF holdings with previous market trends, a familiar rhythm can be observed. In the circled areas of the chart—the decline in December 2024 and the pullback from January to April—the patterns are almost identical: a sharp adjustment followed by a slower stabilization period.

Notably, the previous adjustment lasted about four months, while the current adjustment has only lasted about one month. Therefore, although there has been a slight rebound in inflow momentum since November 25, it still appears to be in the early stages of reaccumulation rather than a final reversal.

Net Inflow: A Signal Worth Watching, It's Too Early to Celebrate

The second ETF indicator—the daily net inflow/outflow line—provides a short-term tactical perspective. Similarly, the changes here, while subtle, are significant. Since November 25, inflows have slightly turned positive again. However, the inflow scale remains small and the intensity unstable. Historically, before a significant trend reversal occurs, ETF inflows not only recover but accelerate significantly.

Currently, there are no signs of an accelerating upward trend in the market. On the contrary, the situation resembles institutional investors "testing the waters," similar to how savvy investors operate near structural price turning points. Moreover, like the previous cycle, even if inflows turn positive, Bitcoin still experienced multiple pullbacks before the next bull market resumed.

So, while the direction is improving, confidence is still lacking.

Stablecoin Liquidity: A Supporting Parallel Indicator

On the other hand, the supply of stablecoins continues to grow slowly. This is crucial because stablecoins represent idle cryptocurrency purchasing power—these funds are waiting on-chain for signals rather than exiting the ecosystem. The operation of these funds differs from ETF allocations. They do not require traditional compliance processes or board approvals and are rarely influenced by macro asset rotations like bonds or gold.

Instead, they represent patient capital.

The slow but steady rise in stablecoin prices indicates that native cryptocurrency investors have not left—they are observing, waiting, and preparing.

This is one of the most evident reasons why the current market structure does not align with a complete market collapse. In a true bear market, funds do not remain in stablecoins—they exit the entire ecosystem entirely.

What This Means for the Cycle

In summary, the market has not signaled the beginning of a new long-term bear market. Instead, it seems to be experiencing:

Mid-cycle adjustment + valuation reset.

It shares many characteristics with the pullback in early 2025:

• Fear rather than euphoria

• Reduced ETF exposure

• Accumulation of stablecoins

• Lateral movement after sharp corrections

The market is still searching for direction, but early signs suggest that this phase is closer to consolidation rather than a crash.

What Needs to Happen Next

To confirm a market recovery, one last signal is needed—and it is not Bitcoin.

It is the flow of Ethereum ETF funds.

If Ethereum begins to show consistent inflows averaging $1 billion or more daily for over ten consecutive days, it would indicate a return of confidence, not just curiosity. This would mark a shift from hesitation to determination and could confirm the end of the pullback.

Until then, the most reasonable expectation is that the market will continue to fluctuate, further test support levels, and gradually build strength before ultimately leading to the next decisive move.

Final View

Despite the uncertainty, the current structure points to continuation rather than reversal. The cycle is not over; it is readjusting. Traditional capital is cautiously rotating, while native cryptocurrency capital is on the sidelines, and the market is approaching a point that must yield to a clear direction.

In other words:

This is not the beginning of a bear market.

This is a time when only those with strong conviction remain alert in a bull market, while others wait for evidence.

Original link