Scan to download
BTC $68,929.73 +4.29%
ETH $2,056.71 +7.31%
BNB $615.45 +1.41%
XRP $1.42 +4.39%
SOL $84.21 +7.69%
TRX $0.2795 +1.13%
DOGE $0.0966 +5.32%
ADA $0.2732 +5.14%
BCH $544.28 +8.88%
LINK $8.86 +7.32%
HYPE $31.81 +6.67%
AAVE $119.05 +11.53%
SUI $0.9735 +7.28%
XLM $0.1661 +5.41%
ZEC $254.66 +10.24%
BTC $68,929.73 +4.29%
ETH $2,056.71 +7.31%
BNB $615.45 +1.41%
XRP $1.42 +4.39%
SOL $84.21 +7.69%
TRX $0.2795 +1.13%
DOGE $0.0966 +5.32%
ADA $0.2732 +5.14%
BCH $544.28 +8.88%
LINK $8.86 +7.32%
HYPE $31.81 +6.67%
AAVE $119.05 +11.53%
SUI $0.9735 +7.28%
XLM $0.1661 +5.41%
ZEC $254.66 +10.24%

Why are we so obsessed with the "thankless" data cleaning?

Core Viewpoint
Summary: Review of the RootData Phase 2 Transparency Reward Program received 1,220 pieces of feedback, with an average approval rate of only 46.2%.
RootData
2026-01-24 16:57:06
Collection
Review of the RootData Phase 2 Transparency Reward Program received 1,220 pieces of feedback, with an average approval rate of only 46.2%.

Author: @BlockCookies

Hello everyone, I am the head of data activities at RootData.

The second phase of the RootData bounty event has successfully concluded. As I publish this recap, rather than cold hard numbers, I would like to discuss with you: Why is advancing "data transparency" in Web3 an extremely difficult yet necessary task?

First, let’s sync up on the data from this event: A total of over 140 unique users participated, providing 1220 pieces of feedback, ultimately resulting in 564 valid data points, with an average approval rate of 46.2%.

Overview of the second phase bounty event data

This event helped RootData supplement nearly 300 "people behind the Alpha," such as executives and team leaders from MOMO.FUN, Subhub, boop, etc. These individuals are often not described in their positions on x or LinkedIn, but sometimes attend events or are active in communities.

At the same time, we corrected about 120 pieces of token unlock information. Some of these had inaccurate TGE timings, and some had unlock rules that were not disclosed in a timely manner; these issues were optimized through the efforts of community members.

Additionally, we conducted in-depth optimizations on 150 existing information points. For example, we found that the founder of Fanable was incorrectly recorded as a non-Web3 individual with the same name, and its managing director Sergio is already no longer with the company; the AINFT project had long since changed its Twitter account…

Why do we need to promote transparency in the Web3 space? These data points may seem mundane, and since RootData is itself an expert in aggregating off-chain data, why should we spend our own resources and mobilize the community to do this "laborious work"?

To be honest, when my boss @yubopan1 assigned me this task, I hesitated. But one of his statements resonated deeply with me: "From the ICO era to the FTX incident, the greatest tragedy for users is the lack of fair 'investment information rights.' With the compliance of crypto, data platforms must take the lead and serve as a mirror to reveal the truth."

As the head of data, I can deeply feel that his judgment is correct: relying solely on one voice is insufficient for accuracy. Data that has not been verified by multiple sources is not enough to make RootData a platform that investors can trust.

Take the data on token unlocks alone; it is very "disjointed": the same project may have five different versions of data across five mainstream unlock platforms.

It is well known that Binance Listing requires the submission of at least three team members. RootData has recorded over 18,000 industry figures; how many updated their resumes urgently before the TGE, and how many "silently left" after securing funding?

In this phase of the event, we found that: many project teams experience frequent changes in core members before and after the TGE. For investors, this is often a "weather vane" for the project's direction. If no one verifies or discloses this information, it will be drowned in the daily explosion of information flow.

To ensure that "transparency" is not just a slogan, our current actionable plans include:

Moreover, we maintain a rigorous review attitude. In this phase of the event, a user provided detailed information about the River development team, but the source was merely a third-party account speaking on Binance Square. Despite the detailed content, due to the lack of official endorsement or cross-verification from multiple sources, we chose not to approve it.

This phase of the event focused on "Binance Alpha," and we also attempted to communicate with the Binance team. We do not wish to target any specific exchange; on the contrary, we hope to stand alongside industry giants.

We confirmed some key dimensions with the Binance team, and they responded very positively: "If there is any information that needs to be confirmed from Alpha, feel free to reach out."

Correcting isolated data points is just the beginning. In the future, RootData will connect "discrete data points" into "logically coherent transparency reports," and even transform them into the most practical investment strategies.

Transparency is a long-term battle and an essential path for Web3 to go mainstream. We need more "data hunters" to join us in unveiling the fog. We welcome everyone to leave comments and discuss.

warnning Risk warning
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.