BTC $65,179.69 +1.10%
ETH $1,899.83 +1.96%
BNB $571.41 +0.58%
XRP $1.11 +1.66%
SOL $77.61 +2.33%
TRX $0.3265 -0.05%
DOGE $0.0720 -0.31%
ADA $0.1674 +0.77%
BCH $217.82 +0.17%
LINK $8.55 +2.53%
HYPE $62.09 +1.84%
AAVE $89.58 +0.52%
SUI $0.7655 +2.20%
XLM $0.1878 -1.65%
ZEC $547.14 -0.71%
BTC $65,179.69 +1.10%
ETH $1,899.83 +1.96%
BNB $571.41 +0.58%
XRP $1.11 +1.66%
SOL $77.61 +2.33%
TRX $0.3265 -0.05%
DOGE $0.0720 -0.31%
ADA $0.1674 +0.77%
BCH $217.82 +0.17%
LINK $8.55 +2.53%
HYPE $62.09 +1.84%
AAVE $89.58 +0.52%
SUI $0.7655 +2.20%
XLM $0.1878 -1.65%
ZEC $547.14 -0.71%

cro

All
Article
Flash

Data: Binance's smart contract position is 1.79 million USD, and MINIMAX's contract position is 606,700 USD, both of which are the highest across the entire platform

Recently, Zhipu and MiniMax have plummeted, leading to an increase in trading activity of related stock derivatives. According to the RootData Pro data panel, there are significant differences in trading conditions across platforms.From the perspective of Open Interest (OI), Zhipu contracts show Binance at $1.79 million as the highest, followed by Bitget at $780,100, and OKX at $243,700; in the MINIMAX contracts, Binance is highest at $606,700, followed by Bitget at $510,700.From the liquidity perspective, Zhipu contracts show Bitget at $142,600 as the highest, with the strongest capacity for large order execution; in the MINIMAX contracts, Bitget is highest at $130,000, followed by Binance at $60,600. HTX has insufficient liquidity at $2,700, with high slippage risk for large orders.From the price difference perspective, Zhipu contracts show Bitget with the lowest (0.0604%), resulting in the smallest entry cost; OKX follows (0.0776%). In the MINIMAX contracts, Bitget has the lowest (0.0315%), resulting in the optimal entry cost. HTX has price differences exceeding 0.18% for both contracts, and Aster exceeds 0.58%, indicating significantly higher entry costs.From the funding rate perspective, both contracts on HTX are at the lowest of 0.0013%, resulting in the smallest long-term holding cost, but with a high price difference; both contracts on Aster have rates below 0.3%, while also having a high price difference.In summary, Binance has the highest OI, suitable for capital accumulation; Bitget excels in both price difference and liquidity, resulting in the lowest overall entry cost. HTX has a high price difference and weak liquidity, leading to significantly higher entry costs compared to other platforms.

Allbridge suffered a loss of approximately $1.65 million due to a flash loan attack, and the cross-chain protocol has been suspended

According to Decrypt, the cross-chain bridge protocol Allbridge has suspended its Core protocol due to a flash loan attack, with the attacker having stolen approximately $1.65 million in assets from the Solana stablecoin liquidity pool.According to analysis by blockchain security firms PeckShield and CertiK, the attacker borrowed $1.12 million in flash loan funds through the Solana lending protocol Kamino, and then manipulated the price mechanism within the Allbridge pool through multiple stablecoin exchange operations to exchange assets at a low price, subsequently transferring the funds across chains to an Ethereum address.During the attack, the attacker exchanged several thousand dollars in USDT to obtain approximately $2.24 million in USDC, and then bridged the funds to Ethereum for further dispersal. It is currently unclear whether some of the funds can still be recovered.Allbridge stated that the team has suspended the Core protocol for security reasons and has requested affected liquidity providers to withdraw their funds immediately. Due to the attack causing an imbalance in the liquidity pool, some traders profited from arbitrage opportunities. Allbridge has called on relevant users to return their profits, stating that the funds will be used to compensate affected LPs.The team indicated that there is no further risk to user funds at this time and will release a detailed incident analysis report after completing the investigation, while also planning to relaunch the Core protocol after removing the liquidity pool. This is the second time Allbridge has encountered a similar flash loan attack. In April 2023, the protocol's BNB Chain liquidity pool suffered a loss of approximately $573,000 due to a similar vulnerability, after which the project team stated that they had recovered most of the funds and adjusted the liquidity calculation mechanism.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.