Viewpoint: The trust neutrality of BTC and ETH involves token distribution and transparency, jurisdiction, and developers
ChainCatcher news, former Facebook stablecoin project head David Marcus posted on the X platform refuting 1confirmation founder Nick Tomaino's claim that ETH is anything but neutral. In response, Nick Tomaino stated that credible neutrality can be defined from three aspects:Token distribution and transparency: BTC has an internal distribution of 0%. Anyone can participate as a PoW miner, and it is completely transparent. ETH has a 10% internal distribution and previously used PoW mining, while Solana has an internal distribution ratio of 62%, with early token distribution and validators not disclosed, resulting in a general lack of transparency;Jurisdiction: Bitcoin initiated the internet-native, Ethereum builds the internet-native together with the global community, while Solana resembles a "corporate token" and has participated in U.S. lobbying;Developer platform: Bitcoin does not have a good developer platform, whereas Ethereum has numerous important use cases (stablecoins, DeFi, NFTs, prediction markets, decentralized social, etc.), prioritizing decentralized platforms for developers and companies. Coinbase, Blackrock, Fidelity, Stripe, Kraken, Deutsche Bank, Sony, Visa, Polymarket, Uniswap, Aave, and Opensea are all building within the Ethereum ecosystem.