BTC $83,358.71 -2.50%
ETH $2,642.44 -3.09%
BNB $770.39 -1.21%
XRP $1.47 -6.09%
SOL $113.27 -3.24%
TRX $0.3397 -0.66%
DOGE $0.0922 -7.23%
ADA $0.2356 -5.71%
BCH $333.96 -3.15%
LINK $12.24 -3.85%
HYPE $91.20 -4.08%
AAVE $136.55 -7.39%
SUI $0.9528 -6.04%
XLM $0.1996 -6.40%
ZEC $1,478.64 -9.76%
AAPL $337.27 -1.04%
AMZN $246.92 -3.06%
GOOGL $336.40 -4.12%
MSFT $497.35 -1.01%
META $728.81 -1.05%
NVDA $222.80 -2.10%
TSLA $376.23 -0.42%
SNDK $1,772.26 -5.68%
INTC $118.66 -3.10%
SPCX $148.54 -3.31%
MU $1,045.99 -3.96%
AMD $596.37 -3.66%
BTC $83,358.71 -2.50%
ETH $2,642.44 -3.09%
BNB $770.39 -1.21%
XRP $1.47 -6.09%
SOL $113.27 -3.24%
TRX $0.3397 -0.66%
DOGE $0.0922 -7.23%
ADA $0.2356 -5.71%
BCH $333.96 -3.15%
LINK $12.24 -3.85%
HYPE $91.20 -4.08%
AAVE $136.55 -7.39%
SUI $0.9528 -6.04%
XLM $0.1996 -6.40%
ZEC $1,478.64 -9.76%
AAPL $337.27 -1.04%
AMZN $246.92 -3.06%
GOOGL $336.40 -4.12%
MSFT $497.35 -1.01%
META $728.81 -1.05%
NVDA $222.80 -2.10%
TSLA $376.23 -0.42%
SNDK $1,772.26 -5.68%
INTC $118.66 -3.10%
SPCX $148.54 -3.31%
MU $1,045.99 -3.96%
AMD $596.37 -3.66%

quantum

All
Article
Flash

first_img StarkWare stated that the cost of quantum-safe Bitcoin transactions has decreased to 67 USD, a reduction of approximately 79%

StarkWare stated in an update on September 23 that the estimated GPU computing cost for preparing a quantum secure Bitcoin (QSB) transaction has dropped to below $67, a decrease of about 79% compared to the approximately $320 computing expenditure for the first similar mainnet transaction in August. According to StarkWare, the first QSB transaction was packaged and confirmed on August 26, with the engineering work completed by Tomer Giladi, and submitted directly through MARA's Slipstream service. The preparation process consumed about 3100 GPU hours, utilized around 100 GPUs, and incurred a computing cost of approximately $320, excluding Bitcoin network transaction fees.This cost reduction resulted from the quantum secure Bitcoin optimization challenge initiated on September 16 by StarkWare, Yukon Research, and Eigen Labs. The challenge invited developers, researchers, and AI agents to optimize transaction construction software, ultimately resulting in 62 adopted improvements across two computational tasks required to prepare a QSB transaction, with benchmark tests showing an estimated computing cost reduction of about 79%. The relevant dashboard currently indicates that the estimated cost has further decreased to $66.The QSB proposal was released by StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy in April, introducing hash-based quantum attack protection for transactions without altering Bitcoin's consensus rules. Due to limited cost, complexity, and applicability, he described it at the time as an emergency measure while continuing to advocate for adjustments at the protocol level.

first_img Coinbase plans post-quantum Bitcoin custody, compatible with various signature schemes

Coinbase Chief Cryptographer Yehuda Lindell stated on the MARA Foundation TV program that the exchange is designing a custody system capable of adapting to any post-quantum signature scheme that Bitcoin may adopt in the future. It is currently unclear which post-quantum signature scheme Bitcoin will use in practical applications. Lindell believes it is unlikely that a single signature scheme will be universally adopted, so preparations must be made for different outcomes across various blockchains.Coinbase is custodian for approximately $250 billion in assets for institutions such as BlackRock. Traditional Multi-Party Computation (MPC) relies on key sharding, but many post-quantum signature schemes may be "not friendly to MPC"; for example, hash-based signatures lack the arithmetic structure required for traditional cryptographic key splitting. Although cryptographers like Dan Boneh are researching relevant solutions, this research is still in a highly experimental phase, and it remains uncertain whether a viable MPC-like solution for hash signatures can be developed.To this end, Coinbase is exploring a backup architecture centered around programmable Hardware Security Modules (HSM), where private keys will be encrypted with post-quantum cryptography and assembled only within physically secure HSMs. Lindell stated that while the completion timeline is uncertain, once finished, "I will be able to say, I can support any scheme," without worrying about a blockchain adopting a signature scheme that it cannot support.

first_img VanEck Research Director: The Bitcoin community has acknowledged the risks of quantum computing

According to Bitcoin Magazine, Matthew Sigel, the head of digital asset research at asset management company VanEck, stated in an interview with CNBC that quantum computing poses a risk to Bitcoin, but the community has recognized the seriousness of the issue. He pointed out that due to the decentralized nature of the crypto network, progress in addressing this issue may be slow, but the community is advancing related work.Sigel said, "This is a risk, but the community has already recognized the scope of the problem, and a large number of talents have gathered and proposed a framework for upgrading the system." He added, "Upgrades will not happen quickly because no CEO can tell developers 'do it now.' The governance process takes more time, and the process is more complex, but there are technical paths to achieve quantum resistance, and you will see more related progress in the coming years."Currently, quantum computers still have error rate issues and cannot crack Bitcoin's encryption algorithms. Some Bitcoin developers have begun testing quantum-resistant signatures on real-time sidechains. Coinbase plans to build a post-quantum signature pipeline using secure enclaves and threshold cryptography, and the Bitcoin Security Alliance, composed of BlackRock, Fidelity Digital Assets, Block, and others, is also supporting proposals like BIP-360 to reduce long-term quantum computing risks.

Coinbase accelerates the promotion of Bitcoin anti-quantum measures: multiple parties discuss future asset migration plans

Coinbase announced that it has collaborated with Stanford University cryptography professor Dan Boneh and Localhost Research to hold a closed-door "Post-Quantum Bitcoin Workshop" at Stanford University, gathering Bitcoin developers, cryptography experts, researchers, institutional custodians, and hardware wallet specialists to discuss the technologies and migration plans for Bitcoin to address future quantum computing threats.The workshop focused on assessing the progress of quantum computing, post-quantum cryptography, and various post-quantum signature schemes applicable to Bitcoin, as well as discussing Ethereum's anti-quantum planning, the practical requirements faced by institutional custody businesses, and how to introduce post-quantum security mechanisms for Bitcoin through new output types. Participants believed that rather than predicting when quantum computing will pose a real threat to existing cryptographic systems, it is more important to establish well-tested response plans in advance.Quantum computing does not currently pose an urgent crisis, but the earlier research and coordination begin, the better we can avoid hasty network upgrades and asset migrations under pressure in the future. However, there is currently no consensus on a single post-quantum solution. Different solutions involve trade-offs in terms of security, transaction data size, hardware performance, key management, and the difficulty of user migration. Participants felt that Bitcoin's anti-quantum measures cannot rely solely on protocol layer upgrades, but must also consider how individual users, institutional custodians, wallets, and hardware devices generate, store, back up, and migrate keys and assets.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.