Vitalik: We need more and better DAOs, rather than just treasury controlled by token voting
Vitalik Buterin stated that the current practices of DAOs in the crypto industry have deviated from the original vision, and it is necessary to rethink and construct "different and better DAO designs." Vitalik pointed out that Ethereum's initial concept was heavily inspired by decentralized autonomous organizations, but today DAOs are often simplified to "treasuries controlled by token voting." While they may function in form, they are inefficient, easily manipulated, and fail to truly alleviate the issues arising from human political games.Vitalik emphasized that DAOs remain an indispensable infrastructure, with application scenarios including: improving oracle designs, implementing on-chain dispute arbitration, maintaining various critical lists, quickly launching short-term collaborative projects, and supporting long-term project maintenance after the original team exits. He believes that the current problem lies not in the motivations of participants, but in the governance and system designs, such as oracles, which are still inadequate.In terms of governance frameworks, Vitalik introduced an analysis perspective of "concavity and convexity problems," arguing that different types of issues require different governance structures: scenarios leaning towards consensus and robustness should emphasize broad participation and resistance to manipulation; while scenarios requiring decisive decision-making should allow for leadership, balanced by decentralized mechanisms.Vitalik further pointed out that for DAOs to truly function, they must address two major challenges: privacy and decision fatigue, and can leverage privacy technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) and multi-party computation, as well as AI and consensus-based communication tools to alleviate governance burdens. He emphasized that AI should not replace human judgment but should serve as a tool to amplify and assist human intentions.Finally, Vitalik stated that future DAO designs need to consider governance mechanisms, privacy technologies, and communication layers as core components rather than auxiliary modules, to ensure that the decentralization and robustness of Ethereum's underlying infrastructure are sustained in its upper-layer applications.