BTC $80,571.74 -1.29%
ETH $2,368.16 -1.17%
BNB $732.42 -1.87%
XRP $1.28 -3.05%
SOL $101.65 -2.33%
TRX $0.3299 -0.23%
DOGE $0.0774 -3.22%
ADA $0.2084 -3.50%
BCH $276.47 -3.17%
LINK $11.59 -4.03%
HYPE $75.44 -3.16%
AAVE $140.24 -5.37%
SUI $0.9471 -4.24%
XLM $0.1698 -3.90%
ZEC $1,152.00 -5.07%
AAPL $346.92 -0.06%
AMZN $248.12 -0.70%
GOOGL $320.75 -0.86%
MSFT $522.60 +0.79%
META $642.10 -0.33%
NVDA $211.30 -0.84%
TSLA $371.26 -1.44%
SNDK $1,235.58 -4.31%
INTC $86.51 +0.16%
SPCX $147.02 -0.55%
MU $881.61 +1.46%
AMD $516.71 +0.93%
BTC $80,571.74 -1.29%
ETH $2,368.16 -1.17%
BNB $732.42 -1.87%
XRP $1.28 -3.05%
SOL $101.65 -2.33%
TRX $0.3299 -0.23%
DOGE $0.0774 -3.22%
ADA $0.2084 -3.50%
BCH $276.47 -3.17%
LINK $11.59 -4.03%
HYPE $75.44 -3.16%
AAVE $140.24 -5.37%
SUI $0.9471 -4.24%
XLM $0.1698 -3.90%
ZEC $1,152.00 -5.07%
AAPL $346.92 -0.06%
AMZN $248.12 -0.70%
GOOGL $320.75 -0.86%
MSFT $522.60 +0.79%
META $642.10 -0.33%
NVDA $211.30 -0.84%
TSLA $371.26 -1.44%
SNDK $1,235.58 -4.31%
INTC $86.51 +0.16%
SPCX $147.02 -0.55%
MU $881.61 +1.46%
AMD $516.71 +0.93%

帮人炒“泰达币”亏了十几万?台州市黄岩区人民法院:合同无效,全数返还

2021-11-20 14:39:17

链捕手消息,近日台州市黄岩法院审结一起委托合同纠纷案件,黄甲经人介绍与张乙签订了《数字货币量化委托协议书》一份,约定黄甲以个人名义转账给张乙20万元用于购买泰达币(USDT),由张乙投资运作,协议到期后保底归还黄甲合同签订时购买的等量数字货币;张乙定期向黄甲结算相应收益,合同到期时结算所委托的数字货币;协议期限为一年。然而,市场行情并未像黄甲预期的那般良好,张乙亦无法控制虚拟货币市场的行情变化,陆陆续续返还给黄甲投资款95760元,剩下的款项迟迟未能返还给,眼见投资回本无望的黄甲将张乙起诉到了法院,要求其返还投资款,并赔偿相应的利息损失。
 
台州市黄岩区人民法院裁定,本案案涉标的物本身不具有合法性,故原、被告关于该交易物的委托托管行为亦不受法律保护,因此原、被告签订的《数字货币量化委托协议书》属于无效合同。被告依无效合同取得的财产应当返还给原告,被告应返还原告剩余的104240元投资款。原告应当明知虚拟货币的投资不受国家法律所保护,而仍然委托被告进行投资,本身存在过错,故其请求赔偿利息等损失的主张于法无据,不予支持。

app_icon
ChainCatcher 与创新者共建Web3世界