BTC $80,429.03 -1.01%
ETH $2,338.21 -2.40%
BNB $729.00 -1.54%
XRP $1.29 -1.21%
SOL $101.12 -2.56%
TRX $0.3289 -0.19%
DOGE $0.0769 -2.64%
ADA $0.2064 -3.24%
BCH $274.01 -3.73%
LINK $11.52 -3.33%
HYPE $75.94 -1.73%
AAVE $136.65 -6.87%
SUI $0.9347 -4.10%
XLM $0.1701 -2.65%
ZEC $1,184.69 -3.48%
AAPL $346.83 0.00%
AMZN $247.63 -0.35%
GOOGL $320.52 -0.33%
MSFT $523.50 -0.13%
META $641.21 -0.61%
NVDA $211.84 -0.07%
TSLA $371.51 -0.29%
SNDK $1,231.45 -1.45%
INTC $86.89 +0.06%
SPCX $146.90 -0.12%
MU $882.78 +0.33%
AMD $518.65 +0.22%
BTC $80,429.03 -1.01%
ETH $2,338.21 -2.40%
BNB $729.00 -1.54%
XRP $1.29 -1.21%
SOL $101.12 -2.56%
TRX $0.3289 -0.19%
DOGE $0.0769 -2.64%
ADA $0.2064 -3.24%
BCH $274.01 -3.73%
LINK $11.52 -3.33%
HYPE $75.94 -1.73%
AAVE $136.65 -6.87%
SUI $0.9347 -4.10%
XLM $0.1701 -2.65%
ZEC $1,184.69 -3.48%
AAPL $346.83 0.00%
AMZN $247.63 -0.35%
GOOGL $320.52 -0.33%
MSFT $523.50 -0.13%
META $641.21 -0.61%
NVDA $211.84 -0.07%
TSLA $371.51 -0.29%
SNDK $1,231.45 -1.45%
INTC $86.89 +0.06%
SPCX $146.90 -0.12%
MU $882.78 +0.33%
AMD $518.65 +0.22%

南昌高新开发区法院:虚拟货币借款纠纷不属民事诉讼受理范围

2023-10-10 19:11:54

ChainCatcher 消息,据南昌高新技术产业开发区人民法院,南昌高新法院公布了一起案例,原告小明(化名)诉称,2021 年 4 月,被告小刚(化名)以炒 USDT 币为由向其借款,并称承诺六个月之内保证还清原告的借款。而后小明将人民币 55 万余元兑换成 8 万余枚 USDT 币向小刚提供借款。但约定时间过后,小刚未依约还款,小明遂向法院提起诉讼。

南昌高新法院经审理认为,人民法院受理民事案件应属于人民法院受理民事诉讼的范围。本案中原告小明起诉时未能证明本案所涉 USDT 泰达币是依法公开发行的货币,故不具有法偿性。由此引发的诉讼不属于人民法院受理民事诉讼的范围。一审裁定,驳回原告小明的起诉。小明不服,于是向二审法院提起上诉。最终,二审裁定,驳回上诉,维持原裁定。

app_icon
ChainCatcher 与创新者共建Web3世界