Scan to download
BTC $61,032.15 -2.34%
ETH $1,644.65 -1.11%
BNB $568.66 -1.05%
XRP $1.07 -2.37%
SOL $68.86 -0.52%
TRX $0.3287 -0.24%
DOGE $0.0766 -3.32%
ADA $0.1453 -4.20%
BCH $191.23 -0.15%
LINK $7.49 -1.85%
HYPE $60.77 -3.51%
AAVE $75.68 +2.98%
SUI $0.6834 -3.30%
XLM $0.1873 -3.06%
ZEC $416.52 -1.81%
BTC $61,032.15 -2.34%
ETH $1,644.65 -1.11%
BNB $568.66 -1.05%
XRP $1.07 -2.37%
SOL $68.86 -0.52%
TRX $0.3287 -0.24%
DOGE $0.0766 -3.32%
ADA $0.1453 -4.20%
BCH $191.23 -0.15%
LINK $7.49 -1.85%
HYPE $60.77 -3.51%
AAVE $75.68 +2.98%
SUI $0.6834 -3.30%
XLM $0.1873 -3.06%
ZEC $416.52 -1.81%

ln

All
Article
Flash

Secret Network lost 4.67 million dollars due to a cross-chain vulnerability, and the attack went undetected for seven days

The blockchain research organization Common Prefix disclosed that on June 10, hackers exploited a vulnerability in the Secret Network and Axelar cross-chain bridge contract to forge deposits and mint uncollateralized tokens, subsequently cashing out approximately $4.67 million.The attack went undetected for seven days until a normal cross-chain transfer failed due to insufficient funds in the escrow account on June 17, revealing the anomaly. The root of the vulnerability lies in the fact that when the contract changed from an escrow model to a minting model, it deleted two key functions responsible for verifying the source of transfers, and it had never undergone an external audit since its deployment in early 2023. Secret Network pointed out that the Axelar bridging infrastructure failed to trigger any effective anomaly monitoring or emergency pause mechanism before the assets were stolen on a large scale.The stolen funds were routed through Osmosis to Ethereum and exchanged for ETH on CoW Protocol, then dispersed into exchanges such as KuCoin, ChangeNow, and HitBTC. Currently, approximately $672,000 remains in the attackers' Axelar wallet. Secret Network has requested Axelar to freeze that address, but the request was denied. Axelar emphasized that its core protocol was never affected, and the exploited contract was not developed or maintained by Axelar. Currently, Axelar has disabled the related cross-chain connections and stated that it is coordinating follow-up actions with exchanges and law enforcement agencies.

Axelar responds to security incident: Axelar and IBC are unaffected, the vulnerability originates from a third-party token contract's "infinite minting" issue

The cross-chain protocol Axelar Network released a statement regarding the recent security incident related to Secret Network, stating that there is a misunderstanding within the community about the event. Both Axelar and the Inter-Blockchain Communication Protocol (IBC) were not attacked or compromised. The affected token smart contracts were neither developed, deployed, nor maintained by Axelar, and Axelar's firewall mechanism also prevented the impact from spreading to other chains.It is reported that the exploited contract is a forked version based on CW20-ICS20, but the developers removed two core security checks, resulting in an "infinite minting" vulnerability. By deleting the verification mechanisms originally used to prevent such issues, this fork altered the original trust model of the contract and did not undergo a new security audit.Axelar Network explained that anyone can deploy contracts for cross-chain asset wrapping through IBC, and similar contracts have also been used to wrap tokens from other chains into Secret Network. However, the Secret side fork version in this incident has vulnerabilities due to the removal of key security checks. This incident is not a unique logical flaw, nor is it an issue with the IBC protocol itself, but rather a security risk introduced by modifications to third-party contracts.

Analysis: Anthropic refuses to fix the Fable jailbreak vulnerability, leading the U.S. government to implement export controls

David Sacks, the head of AI and crypto affairs at the White House, stated that although the commercial version of the Mythos series model Fable released by Anthropic this week includes safety barriers, once those barriers are bypassed, users will be able to access Mythos's advanced cyber attack capabilities. Sacks pointed out that Anthropic had previously described Mythos as a "cyber weapon" that requires regulation, so fixing the related vulnerabilities should have been its responsibility.Sacks mentioned that a partner trusted by both Anthropic and the U.S. government discovered a jailbreak method to bypass the safety barriers while testing Fable. The U.S. government subsequently requested Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei to fix the vulnerabilities or take the model offline, but this request was refused. Anthropic stated in a declaration that the vulnerability is "not serious," a claim that contradicts the judgment of the U.S. government and relevant partners.Sacks stated that Anthropic has always emphasized that safety should be prioritized, but this time it prioritized maintaining consumer-grade model services. In response, the U.S. government reluctantly imposed export control measures on Anthropic and hopes that Anthropic will resolve the safety issues as soon as possible to lift the related restrictions and restore the full release of Fable.Sacks also denied that this action is related to previous disputes between the U.S. Department of Defense and Anthropic, stating that the government recognizes Anthropic's technological capabilities and believes that the current issues can be resolved relatively easily, with the initiative currently in Anthropic's hands.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.