BTC $78,085.48 -1.05%
ETH $2,446.71 -0.76%
BNB $696.21 -0.28%
XRP $1.38 -5.81%
SOL $96.22 -1.37%
TRX $0.3343 -1.98%
DOGE $0.0844 -4.56%
ADA $0.2041 -4.70%
BCH $259.05 -2.97%
LINK $11.23 -1.93%
HYPE $80.05 -1.53%
AAVE $123.06 -3.30%
SUI $0.7332 -6.10%
XLM $0.1789 -5.67%
ZEC $771.44 -3.61%
BTC $78,085.48 -1.05%
ETH $2,446.71 -0.76%
BNB $696.21 -0.28%
XRP $1.38 -5.81%
SOL $96.22 -1.37%
TRX $0.3343 -1.98%
DOGE $0.0844 -4.56%
ADA $0.2041 -4.70%
BCH $259.05 -2.97%
LINK $11.23 -1.93%
HYPE $80.05 -1.53%
AAVE $123.06 -3.30%
SUI $0.7332 -6.10%
XLM $0.1789 -5.67%
ZEC $771.44 -3.61%

anthropic

Anthropic is an artificial intelligence safety and research company focused on developing safer and more controllable AI systems. Founded in 2021, Anthropic is committed to ensuring the transparency and reliability of AI technology through research and technological development, reducing potential risks and negative impacts. The company was founded by former employees of OpenAI and aims to promote ethical and safety standards in the field of AI.
All
Article
Flash

SemiAnalysis Founder: By 2028, most of the new AI computing power will belong to two companies

In the latest podcast, SemiAnalysis founder Dylan Patel predicts that by 2028, OpenAI and Anthropic may account for 70% to 80% of the world's new AI computing power, with the total computing power scale potentially exceeding 100GW. Patel stated that the two companies currently account for about 30% of the world's annual new computing power, and this proportion is still rising rapidly.Patel pointed out that the business model of leading AI laboratories is changing, with a significant increase in the efficiency of AI computing power output. Currently, Anthropic's revenue per megawatt of computing power has reached about $50 million and may further rise to $100 million. This allows OpenAI and Anthropic to procure or lease computing power at high prices ranging from $25 million to $50 million per megawatt.Patel expects that global AI-related capital expenditures will reach about $11 trillion from 2024 to 2029, with over $5 trillion needing to be financed through debt. Due to the potential return on investment of AI infrastructure being far higher than that of traditional industries, tech giants may accept higher financing costs, thereby pushing up overall credit rates and squeezing the valuations of traditional assets and highly leveraged economies. Additionally, Patel believes that the new computing power may not primarily be used for providing model inference services externally, but may instead flow more towards internal research and development and self-improvement of models within AI laboratories.

first_img Thomson Reuters launched its self-developed AI model Thomson-1, based on Alibaba's open-source Qwen

According to Business Insider, Thomson Reuters launched its first self-developed AI model, Thomson-1, on Monday. This model is based on Snowdon and constructed through "re-alignment" of Alibaba's open-source Qwen model. Open-source means anyone can download and modify the model for free. Thomson-1 will take over some tasks previously handled by Anthropic's Claude, but it is not intended to completely replace collaboration with Anthropic and other labs, initially focusing on the company's areas of expertise, starting with document review.This move aims to address the high AI costs brought by models like Claude and OpenAI Codex, and reflects the use of cheaper Chinese open-source AI. CTO Joel Hron stated that the main reason is to better leverage Thomson Reuters' own expertise and control costs. The company expanded its collaboration with Anthropic in May this year for the AI legal assistant CoCounsel, which still primarily relies on Claude. Hron said, "Our main goal is to gradually make Thomson the model that drives more and more capabilities for CoCounsel."Thomson Reuters, in collaboration with a team from Imperial College London, spent months transforming Qwen to build Snowdon and ensured it is "ethically and politically bias-processed and safe to use." Hron pointed out that having a proprietary model allows for development based on its own intellectual property rather than continuously paying external AI companies, comparing it to renting versus buying a house: renting provides shelter but does not accumulate long-term equity.

Anthropic's flagship model is facing a downturn, with only 11% of corporate spending directed towards Fable5

On August 24, according to the Financial Times, Anthropic's U.S. corporate clients are reducing their use of its most powerful model, Fable5, opting instead for lower-priced alternative models, raising concerns about its high-investment business model. Anthropic is currently preparing for an IPO, with the market expecting its valuation to reach $2 trillion or more, potentially listing as early as September.Data from Ramp on spending by 70,000 companies shows that two months after the release of Fable5, corporate spending on this model accounted for only about 11% of Anthropic's total tool spending, and has recently stabilized. Analysts believe the main reason is that Fable5 is expensive, while older models can meet the needs of most companies; the Opus5 launched at the end of July is smaller and cheaper, with corporate spending already exceeding that of Fable5. Fable5 was withdrawn shortly after its release in early June due to intervention by the Trump administration on national security grounds, and was allowed to go back online on July 1, but demand and adoption rates remain lower than those of previous cutting-edge models.Anthropic's annualized revenue reached $65 billion last month, up from $47 billion in May, growing nearly sevenfold since the beginning of the year; the company achieved adjusted operating profit for the first time in the second quarter and has 6,000 clients with annual spending exceeding $100,000. Companies are controlling AI spending by choosing models with better cost-performance ratios, while OpenAI has seen a rebound, with annualized revenue growing 35% this quarter after the release of GPT5.6, exceeding $40 billion. The market is shifting from "chasing the strongest model" to placing greater emphasis on a comprehensive balance of model capability, price, and actual ROI.

first_img Ultraman is concerned that AI may fall into the hands of a few powerful individuals, stating that some people are overly anxious

According to Business Insider, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman expressed in the David Senra podcast that he is concerned that AI may one day be controlled by a few companies, models, or individuals, causing the vast majority of consumers to lose their voice in how technology shapes the world. He stated that the correct approach is to ensure that people firmly control the future, and society and models will evolve together.Altman is also worried about AI escaping human control. He pointed out that an excessive fear of the latter risk could lead to the former situation becoming a reality, as some advocate sacrificing a significant amount of freedom for security out of anxiety. The article suggests this may indirectly refer to Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who has repeatedly warned about AI risks and called for increased government regulation. Anthropic is the only mainstream AI company that has not signed the open letter supporting open-weight models.Although OpenAI has not yet open-sourced its cutting-edge models, it released two open-weight models last year: gpt-oss-120b and gpt-oss-20b. Altman also stated that U.S. AI leaders have failed to adequately demonstrate to the public how the technology enhances life autonomy, and he anticipates the largest wave of entrepreneurship, as AI is empowering more people to start small businesses.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.