BTC $77,718.46 -3.73%
ETH $2,442.06 -3.14%
BNB $690.94 -3.14%
XRP $1.38 -4.68%
SOL $103.86 -4.77%
TRX $0.3408 +0.61%
DOGE $0.0851 -4.66%
ADA $0.2026 -5.76%
BCH $246.16 -8.66%
LINK $11.43 -4.67%
HYPE $80.19 -4.77%
AAVE $121.73 -5.67%
SUI $0.7418 -5.10%
XLM $0.1787 -4.70%
ZEC $797.51 -2.39%
BTC $77,718.46 -3.73%
ETH $2,442.06 -3.14%
BNB $690.94 -3.14%
XRP $1.38 -4.68%
SOL $103.86 -4.77%
TRX $0.3408 +0.61%
DOGE $0.0851 -4.66%
ADA $0.2026 -5.76%
BCH $246.16 -8.66%
LINK $11.43 -4.67%
HYPE $80.19 -4.77%
AAVE $121.73 -5.67%
SUI $0.7418 -5.10%
XLM $0.1787 -4.70%
ZEC $797.51 -2.39%

vic

All
Article
Flash

first_img Attackers stole over $1 million in user funds from the new Solana bank Avici

Solana's new bank Avici is facing ongoing attacks, with attackers having stolen over $1 million from users. The attackers' wallet holds 10,005.03 SOL (approximately $1.07 million) and about $11,600 in USDC and USDT. The attack method involves first calling the SubmitSignatures of the Avici authorization program, then calling the AddCollateralAdmin of the collateral program, and finally executing WithdrawCollateralAsset to withdraw the balance. Both of Avici's programs are upgradable and share the same standard Solana account instead of multi-signature upgrade permissions.Avici confirmed the incident 1 hour and 53 minutes after the first theft transaction, stating, "We are aware of the issue affecting card balance withdrawals and are working directly with all relevant partners to resolve it." Prior to this, users had reported stolen balances on social media. A real-time tracker established by anonymous on-chain analyst STACC recorded 125 different sending accounts, with transfer amounts ranging from approximately 9 USDC to over 26,000 USDT.As a result, the AVICI token fell 49.4% in 24 hours to $0.2175, with a market cap of approximately $2.84 million, hitting an all-time low. Avici raised funds through MetaDAO in October 2025, with an original cap of $3.5 million, but the final committed amount reached $34.2 million, and the team refunded 89.8% of the committed USDC.

first_img Changxin and Yangtze Memory Technology validate quality with Apple and resell to North American cloud services

According to DIGITIMES, Changxin Memory and Yangtze Memory continue to expand, and recently Apple is actively seeking to introduce the two Chinese memory supply chains, drawing attention to their entry into Apple's supply system. Industry insiders reveal that the two manufacturers are actually using Apple to prove that the quality of Chinese DRAM and NAND Flash has reached international standards, while secretly expanding their cloud and enterprise market share through third-party assembly for export to North American neocloud operators.Changxin Memory's parent company, Changxin Technology, has completed fundraising of 29.5 billion yuan, while Yangtze Memory plans to raise about 33 billion yuan through an IPO for production line upgrades and R&D. Yangtze Memory has turned profitable in 2024, with a net profit attributable to the parent company reaching 33.379 billion yuan in the first quarter of 2026; its third-phase new factory will begin production ahead of schedule in the fourth quarter of 2026, with a total monthly production capacity of 100,000 wafers, of which about 20% will be trial-produced LPDDR, becoming its first DRAM base. The supply chain indicates that the two companies are expected to increase the self-sufficiency rate of domestic memory in China to over 50% by the end of 2027 to 2028.Yangtze Memory sells NAND to third-party module manufacturers and assembles them into enterprise-level SSDs to avoid location sensitivity; Changxin Memory has already obtained certifications from small and medium-sized cloud operators in the U.S., Canada, and other regions. U.S. private enterprises can, in principle, procure from the two companies, with the entity list primarily restricting their access to U.S. technology, but not completely prohibiting private procurement. Cloud operators also reduce compliance risks through methods such as renting computing power or holding assets through third parties. The industry believes that Apple's influence on supply and demand in the industry is declining, and the two companies have no intention of supplying Apple in large quantities or engaging in price competition, making it difficult to meet Apple's demand in the Chinese market in the short term.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.