Scan to download
BTC $64,158.89 +0.04%
ETH $1,735.90 +0.26%
BNB $592.90 +0.70%
XRP $1.12 -0.82%
SOL $73.95 +1.28%
TRX $0.3283 +0.78%
DOGE $0.0832 +0.11%
ADA $0.1601 -0.26%
BCH $199.49 +0.52%
LINK $7.94 +0.29%
HYPE $66.28 -4.26%
AAVE $75.50 -0.07%
SUI $0.7070 +0.05%
XLM $0.2122 -0.18%
ZEC $446.48 -4.26%
BTC $64,158.89 +0.04%
ETH $1,735.90 +0.26%
BNB $592.90 +0.70%
XRP $1.12 -0.82%
SOL $73.95 +1.28%
TRX $0.3283 +0.78%
DOGE $0.0832 +0.11%
ADA $0.1601 -0.26%
BCH $199.49 +0.52%
LINK $7.94 +0.29%
HYPE $66.28 -4.26%
AAVE $75.50 -0.07%
SUI $0.7070 +0.05%
XLM $0.2122 -0.18%
ZEC $446.48 -4.26%

andre

Sonic Labs announced significant changes to its board and leadership, with Andre Cronje and two others resigning from the board

According to Sonic Labs' official statement, the company has made significant adjustments in its board, leadership, and operational direction. Michael Kong, Andre Cronje, and David Richardson will resign from their positions on the Sonic Labs board, but all three will retain their investments in Sonic and fully transfer their responsibilities, though they will no longer make business decisions for the organization.Sonic Labs also announced that Matt Visser will serve as CEO, and Kosta Kourkoumelis will serve as COO. The primary task of the new management is not to announce a roadmap, but to enforce operational discipline and regain trust. Matt Visser stated, "I am not here to promise an immediate turnaround. I will make Sonic better by 1% every day and let it compound."Sonic Labs indicated that the current token price and community sentiment are both low, and the next 100 days will be regarded as a new first day, with the goal of achieving small improvements daily and allowing them to compound. Sonic Labs is committed to promoting transparent governance, establishing a dedicated risk and compliance committee, prioritizing the community, and reducing vague announcements while providing clearer progress updates.On the technical side, Sonic Labs stated that the engineering team's progress has not been affected. Since 2026, 400 valid pull requests have been merged into the GitHub main branch, two official releases have been published, and major version 2.2.0 is under development, with six candidate versions released so far, and a private testnet has gone live and is undergoing intensive testing.

Andre Cronje: Nowadays, many DeFi protocols are no longer true DeFi in the real sense, and the industry is debating whether a circuit breaker mechanism should be introduced

Andre Cronje stated in an interview with Cointelegraph that many DeFi protocols today are "no longer truly DeFi" and are more like "profit-driven companies operated by teams," as they generally rely on upgradable contracts, multi-signatures, off-chain infrastructure, and manual operational control.Cronje pointed out that the current industry is still overly focused on smart contract audits while neglecting operational risks that are closer to traditional finance (TradFi). He believes that recent attack incidents are not due to code vulnerabilities but stem from off-chain infrastructure, permission management, and social engineering attacks.The discussion arises from the recent frequent security incidents in DeFi. In April, protocols such as Flying Tulip, Drift Protocol, and Kelp encountered security events, with Drift and Kelp suffering losses of approximately $280 million and $293 million, respectively.In response, Flying Tulip has introduced a "Withdrawal Circuit Breaker," which can delay or queue withdrawal requests when unusually large withdrawals occur, allowing the team about 6 hours to respond. Cronje emphasized that this mechanism does not permanently freeze withdrawals but serves as a layer of protection within the security system.However, Michael Egorov holds a cautious attitude towards this. He stated that the circuit breaker itself could also become a new point of centralized risk. If control permissions fall into the hands of an attacker, the mechanism originally intended to protect the protocol could instead be used to freeze assets or directly transfer funds.Egorov believes that the long-term direction of DeFi should be to minimize human intervention and centralized permissions as much as possible, rather than adding more layers of manual control. "The security of DeFi comes from decentralization, not more human management."
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.