BTC $81,843.92 +0.50%
ETH $2,411.96 -0.50%
BNB $722.25 +0.54%
XRP $1.29 -0.13%
SOL $103.85 -0.13%
TRX $0.3328 -1.15%
DOGE $0.0792 -0.49%
ADA $0.2196 -0.64%
BCH $273.37 +0.42%
LINK $12.00 -0.39%
HYPE $78.59 -0.15%
AAVE $153.33 -0.52%
SUI $0.9810 -0.62%
XLM $0.1780 +0.01%
ZEC $1,121.31 -3.14%
AAPL $343.65 +0.06%
AMZN $249.57 +0.04%
GOOGL $340.18 -0.01%
MSFT $527.91 -0.06%
META $707.83 -0.21%
NVDA $213.85 -0.45%
TSLA $351.90 -0.28%
SNDK $1,272.29 -1.85%
INTC $88.77 -0.70%
SPCX $144.65 -0.50%
MU $868.25 -1.11%
AMD $526.03 -0.91%
BTC $81,843.92 +0.50%
ETH $2,411.96 -0.50%
BNB $722.25 +0.54%
XRP $1.29 -0.13%
SOL $103.85 -0.13%
TRX $0.3328 -1.15%
DOGE $0.0792 -0.49%
ADA $0.2196 -0.64%
BCH $273.37 +0.42%
LINK $12.00 -0.39%
HYPE $78.59 -0.15%
AAVE $153.33 -0.52%
SUI $0.9810 -0.62%
XLM $0.1780 +0.01%
ZEC $1,121.31 -3.14%
AAPL $343.65 +0.06%
AMZN $249.57 +0.04%
GOOGL $340.18 -0.01%
MSFT $527.91 -0.06%
META $707.83 -0.21%
NVDA $213.85 -0.45%
TSLA $351.90 -0.28%
SNDK $1,272.29 -1.85%
INTC $88.77 -0.70%
SPCX $144.65 -0.50%
MU $868.25 -1.11%
AMD $526.03 -0.91%

coins

All
Article
Flash

first_img Report: The cost of remittances using stablecoins is 84% lower than traditional transfers, with settlement taking just a few minutes

The third-quarter report released by the stablecoin payment network Borderless.xyz shows that the median cost of sending a $200 remittance through stablecoin funding channels is 1%, or $2; whereas, according to World Bank data, the median cost of traditional remittance channels is 6.36%, or $12.72. In comparison, the cost of stablecoin remittances is approximately 84% lower. This comparison uses Borderless's pricing for the third quarter of 2026 and World Bank data for the same period in 2025.In emerging markets, the cost advantage is also evident. The cost of stablecoin remittances in Sub-Saharan Africa is 2.9%, while traditional transfers are 8.46%; in Latin America, the figures are 1.25% and 5.64%, respectively. In terms of corporate payments, a $10,000 stablecoin transfer to the Eurozone can cost as low as $26 when choosing the lowest-cost service provider, with the median service provider costing $52; traditional international bank wire transfers for the same amount require $135 to $150, including transfer fees and a 1% foreign exchange spread.Regarding settlement speed, the report states that stablecoin payments can reach the recipient's local bank account within minutes. The median settlement time for Brazil's PIX network in the third quarter is 2 minutes, Mexico's SPEI is 3 minutes, and Colombia's PSE is 2 minutes; traditional SWIFT transfers typically settle the next day, with the slowest 10% taking 3 business days. The success rate for receiving funds varies significantly: Mexico's SPEI is 98.6%, Brazil's PIX is 97.8%, Colombia's PSE is 79%, and Costa Rica's SINPE is only 73%. Standard Chartered Bank recently pointed out that although the total market capitalization of stablecoins has grown relatively slowly this year, transaction volumes are still rising, and it is expected that this market will reach $2 trillion by 2030, two years later than previously predicted.

first_img Nine cryptocurrency companies established the Quantum Alliance, aiming to defend against quantum risks to 6.4 million bitcoins

According to CoinDesk, nine cryptocurrency companies announced the establishment of a Quantum Alliance on Thursday, planning to develop universal security standards for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other blockchain networks to address the threats posed by future quantum computers.The alliance estimates that about 6.4 million Bitcoins, or 30.2% of the supply, have their public keys exposed, and future quantum computers could reverse-engineer wallet public keys to recover private keys and steal assets. The alliance explained that since no quantum computer currently has sufficient computing power, these Bitcoins cannot be stolen in this manner for the time being. Members include Hacken, Midnight Foundation under Charles Hoskinson, the quantum-resistant layer one blockchain Quantus, and Postquant Labs.There are significant differences in the industry regarding when the quantum threat will arrive. Bryn Bennett, Chief Revenue Officer of The Vault, stated that no one knows the exact date, but estimates are continuously being revised downward, and this risk can be planned for in advance. The question for custodians is not whether the threat will appear in 2028 or 2035, but whether they can complete the migration if it arrives earlier.Richard Carback, Chief Technology Officer of Postquant Labs, believes that it is realistic for machines capable of breaking existing cryptography to emerge by 2028. Recent research has lowered the estimates of the computing power required to attack Bitcoin and Ethereum, but currently, no existing machines can break their cryptography, and related predictions remain controversial.The question of whether to freeze vulnerable Bitcoins has also sparked debate. Bennett pointed out that no one is responsible for this issue; custodians only protect client assets, not abandoned assets. Freezing tokens is a governance decision of the Bitcoin network, and any freeze would set a precedent of exchanging quantum risk for property rights and neutrality. Carback prefers to transfer vulnerable tokens and suggested placing them in a trust, allowing holders who can prove ownership to reclaim their funds.Binance founder Changpeng Zhao once suggested that if quantum technology advances and Satoshi Nakamoto's approximately 1.1 million Bitcoins remain untouched, they should be frozen; Bitcoin developer Jameson Lopp also proposed limiting vulnerable tokens to prevent theft, but critics argue that freezing someone else's Bitcoins contradicts the promise that no one can confiscate Bitcoins. Achieving quantum resistance requires replacing the digital signatures that authorize transactions, which necessitates consensus among developers, miners, wallet service providers, exchanges, and users. The new signatures may also occupy more block space, increasing transaction fees or reducing the number of transactions Bitcoin can process.

CoinShares: Digital asset investment products saw an outflow of 434 million dollars this week

According to the CoinShares market report, the U.S. September CPI rose by 0.6% month-on-month and 3.7% year-on-year, exceeding the market expectation of 3.6%. Gasoline prices increased by 9.1% for the month, accounting for about half of the overall increase. The core CPI rose by 0.3% month-on-month and 2.6% year-on-year. During the same period, U.S. September retail sales grew by 0.8% month-on-month, higher than the expected approximately 0.3%, with August data revised up to 1.3%. However, retail sales excluding gasoline only grew by 0.2%, lower than August's 1%.The report pointed out that inflation remains high, and economic demand also remains resilient, leading the market to reprice the Federal Reserve's policy in a hawkish manner, causing Bitcoin and the overall digital asset market to decline. Data shows that since the CPI was released, market sentiment has significantly weakened, with global digital asset investment products seeing an outflow of $434 million so far this week. Regarding interest rate expectations, as of October 15, Polymarket data shows that the probability of the Federal Reserve maintaining interest rates at the October meeting is about 75%, while the probability of a 25 basis point rate hike is about 25%. After the CPI release, the futures market clearly shifted to a hawkish stance, with expectations for another rate hike within the year rising significantly.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.