EVAN

Loosening cryptocurrency regulations, the Federal Reserve and other institutions have withdrawn relevant guidance for the banking industry

ChainCatcher news, the Federal Reserve announced on Thursday the withdrawal of regulatory guidance regarding banks' cryptocurrency assets and dollar token businesses, and simultaneously updated the relevant business expectation standards. This move aims to ensure that regulatory requirements keep pace with the evolution of risks and further support innovation in the banking system.The announcement shows that the Federal Reserve has officially abolished the regulatory letter issued in 2022, which previously required state member banks to report in advance on proposed or existing cryptocurrency asset businesses. After the withdrawal, the Federal Reserve will no longer require banks to fulfill reporting obligations, instead opting to monitor related activities through regular regulatory procedures. Also abolished is the 2023 guidance document regarding the "no objection" procedure for state member banks participating in dollar token businesses.In addition, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation jointly decided to withdraw two policy statements regarding banks' cryptocurrency asset businesses and risk exposures, which were jointly issued by federal banking regulators in 2023. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency had previously withdrawn from that statement. The Federal Reserve stated that it will collaborate with other regulatory agencies in the future to assess whether new guidance frameworks are needed to support innovation, including cryptocurrency asset businesses.

Wu Jiezhang: In response to the FDT incident, the Hong Kong authorities need to promptly review the relevant regulatory system

ChainCatcher news, according to Hong Kong media Sing Tao Daily, regarding the recent $500 million cryptocurrency trust fraud case, the chairman of the Hong Kong Legislative Council's Web3 and Virtual Assets Development Subcommittee, Wu Jietzhuang, stated, "Hong Kong is actively attracting foreign investment, including mainland funds, but in fact, many outsiders have a very superficial understanding of Hong Kong's system, and there are even many misunderstandings. I believe this is a problem that needs to be addressed. The FDT incident has international implications, and the authorities must quickly re-examine different regulatory systems to respond to society.Due to the lack of a custodial regulatory system, many times Web3 companies rely on trust companies to help third parties custody assets. If this is done properly, there is no problem, but those with ulterior motives may exploit this loophole to engage in illegal activities. I am concerned that external confidence in Hong Kong may weaken, and I suggest that the authorities should increase public education and examine whether there is room for optimization."Legislative Council financial sector member Chan Chan-ying pointed out that if assets are entrusted to a trust company in the form of a company, a regulatory vacuum may arise. He advised investors to carefully investigate the company's background and called for consideration of including "trusts" within the scope of legal regulation.

Hyperliquid vault attacked again: organized, premeditated, and more cunning; if Binance releases relevant positive news, it may "directly kill the game."

ChainCatcher message, on-chain analyst @ai_9684xtpa released a review of the Hyperliquid vault being attacked again:The 50x leverage whale on Hyperliquid previously used the Hyperliquid mechanism to "actively liquidate 160,000 ETH long positions" and withdrew a profit of $1.857 million;More cunning target selection: At that time, the 50x leverage whale on Hyperliquid chose ETH as the target, while this time the attacker’s target was the Memecoin $Jellyjelly, which had a depth difference of N times, making price manipulation much easier.Setting bait with airdrop: Address 0xde9...f5c91 opened a $4.08 million short position on $JELLY on Hyperliquid, with an opening price of $0.0095 and a margin of 3.5 million USDC.Replaying the active liquidation: Another address Hc8gN...WRcwq, after opening the short position, collaborated to crash the spot price, creating floating profit space for the short position, while the opening address withdrew 2.76 million USDC in margin, using the same trick to have the position liquidated and taken over by the vault.Turning around to buy and empty the vault: Two waves of intensive buying starting at 21:01 and 21:45 further enlarged the vault's floating loss until the amount became significant enough to attract market attention.As long as jellyjelly does not drop, retail investors in HLP will withdraw their funds; the more withdrawals, the lower the liquidation price, which can be understood as "the early runners profit at the expense of the late runners." Subsequently, HLP may experience a bank run, and eventually, it may not even require jellyjelly to pull much from the vault to be forcibly liquidated due to insufficient margin... However, currently, HLP's TVL has decreased by about $20 million, and the liquidation price for the short position has dropped to around $0.14. The last buying operation of the address manipulating the coin price was 1 hour ago; this address currently holds 124 million jellyjelly (worth $4.86 million), making it the top holding address on-chain. This address currently has no more funds available for buying, which is also the main reason for the significant price fluctuations that followed. As one of the main competitors of Hyperliquid, if Binance releases related positive news, such as listing jellyjelly spot or others, it will directly kill the competition.
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovators