BTC $80,734.49 -0.00%
ETH $2,357.00 -0.76%
BNB $741.91 +0.68%
XRP $1.30 +1.06%
SOL $102.35 -0.03%
TRX $0.3291 -0.19%
DOGE $0.0777 -1.03%
ADA $0.2085 -1.08%
BCH $277.18 -0.81%
LINK $11.60 -1.66%
HYPE $76.67 -0.29%
AAVE $137.59 -4.42%
SUI $0.9375 -2.07%
XLM $0.1717 -0.60%
ZEC $1,210.88 +3.45%
AAPL $347.09 -0.11%
AMZN $248.41 -0.23%
GOOGL $320.95 -0.27%
MSFT $524.34 -0.15%
META $642.03 +0.08%
NVDA $212.40 +0.47%
TSLA $371.67 -0.23%
SNDK $1,240.42 +0.12%
INTC $87.26 +0.54%
SPCX $147.24 -0.26%
MU $888.01 +0.61%
AMD $521.91 +0.60%
BTC $80,734.49 -0.00%
ETH $2,357.00 -0.76%
BNB $741.91 +0.68%
XRP $1.30 +1.06%
SOL $102.35 -0.03%
TRX $0.3291 -0.19%
DOGE $0.0777 -1.03%
ADA $0.2085 -1.08%
BCH $277.18 -0.81%
LINK $11.60 -1.66%
HYPE $76.67 -0.29%
AAVE $137.59 -4.42%
SUI $0.9375 -2.07%
XLM $0.1717 -0.60%
ZEC $1,210.88 +3.45%
AAPL $347.09 -0.11%
AMZN $248.41 -0.23%
GOOGL $320.95 -0.27%
MSFT $524.34 -0.15%
META $642.03 +0.08%
NVDA $212.40 +0.47%
TSLA $371.67 -0.23%
SNDK $1,240.42 +0.12%
INTC $87.26 +0.54%
SPCX $147.24 -0.26%
MU $888.01 +0.61%
AMD $521.91 +0.60%

employee

All
Article
Flash

Ultraman introduced three paths for employees to develop safe super AI

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman introduced three proposals for the safe development of super AI to employees last week. The first is to establish a global regulatory organization similar to the International Atomic Energy Agency, to inspect advanced models and audit safety measures. Insiders say Altman leans towards this route.The second proposal emulates the European Organization for Nuclear Research, merging major AI laboratories into one organization or collaborating through a unified agency for joint development, rather than continuing to race against each other. The third and most extreme, which he referred to as the "Eliezer Plan": an AI company achieves recursive self-improvement first, and then uses overwhelming economic power to control computing power, making it impossible for other developers to catch up. Altman described this idea as "melting down all other companies' GPUs," while stating that this plan is very bad and is only meant to illustrate the extreme possibility.The idea of "melting down GPUs" comes from AI safety researcher Eliezer Yudkowsky. He proposed a thought experiment in 2021, suggesting that super AI could create self-replicating nanomachines to melt down global GPUs, stating that this is merely an extreme example to illustrate the intensity of intervention, not a proposal to be executed. OpenAI proposed the establishment of an "AI version of the International Atomic Energy Agency" in 2023, and Google DeepMind head Hassabis has also advocated for the creation of an "AI version of CERN." Currently, OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic plan to establish a joint safety standards organization by the end of this year or early next year, but there are disagreements over the responsibility for model safety testing. Altman hopes to set speed limits for AI development while stating that OpenAI cannot currently cede its competitive advantage to rivals.

first_img Anthropic opens employee access to METR, advancing independent security assessments

On October 15, Anthropic announced that it has begun providing employee-like access to a team from the nonprofit organization METR for the purpose of evaluating its models and safety practices. The company stated that last month it committed to strengthening independent third-party evaluations and signed the White House "Superintelligence Agreement," which includes a commitment to collaborate with independent external auditors or evaluators. Over the past year, Anthropic has worked with METR to review several risk reports, and METR will publish its risk assessment results.Anthropic has equipped six METR employees with company hardware, office space, and access to internal tools and systems roughly equivalent to those of its own risk assessment team. With a few explicitly defined categories such as client data, attorney-client privileged information, and model architecture information, employees are encouraged to share information as they would with colleagues working on alignment risk. METR may publish analyses of risk levels, events, or practices, which Anthropic cannot veto, but can request the removal of pre-defined narrow category information; METR may publicly state the circumstances of redaction and indicate whether it believes the redaction is reasonable without disclosing the content that was redacted. This arrangement is limited to small teams working under enforceable agreements, and other METR employees are isolated from working with this team.Anthropic is also collaborating with SecureBio and Accenture on assessments and is in early discussions with other organizations, including Hugging Face. SecureBio is reviewing the chemical and biological weapons section of the August 2026 risk report, having previously completed and published a pilot review of the previous risk report.

first_img Court documents show that Microsoft employees questioned whether the AI scraping system constitutes "the largest labor theft in history."

According to Decrypt, court documents unsealed in the lawsuit between The New York Times and OpenAI and Microsoft show that Microsoft employees discussed whether OpenAI's use of news articles to train its models constituted "the largest labor theft in human history," and could potentially trigger a "doom loop" that leads to a decline in model quality. A 2023 internal Microsoft memo warned that millions of people worldwide would soon view the large model's "consumption" of their works as "an unprecedented and astonishing theft," and stated that large AI models are "products that destroy their own supply chains."Microsoft stated in the documents that these memos were written by Director of Applied Science Brent Hecht and do not represent the company's views, as his role is to provide "different and asymmetric perspectives." Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella testified that "any content behind a paywall should be authorized by those who wish to use it," and stated that if he had known in advance that OpenAI was using paid content for training, he would have exercised Microsoft's rights to demand that the model be retrained.Additionally, an OpenAI employee had mentioned to President Greg Brockman the construction of "hacker methods" to bypass The New York Times paywall, to which Brockman replied, "Nice." Both OpenAI and Microsoft argue that the relevant training falls under fair use. The case was initiated by The New York Times at the end of 2023, and 11 publishers have since joined the lawsuit.

Two Robinhood employees have been sued for insider trading for pre-positioning through Hyperliquid before the coin listing

On September 15, local time, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) announced that two Robinhood engineers, Hefu Chai and Huaisong Xiang (also known as Jerry Xiang), have been charged with commodity fraud and wire fraud for allegedly trading Hyperliquid perpetual contracts using non-public information from the company.SDNY stated that during their tenure at Robinhood, the two had access to confidential information regarding the launch of new tokens and their launch timelines from Robinhood Crypto. Between 2025 and 2026, they are accused of repeatedly purchasing Hyperliquid perpetual contracts for the corresponding tokens before the company publicly announced the launch of those tokens, profiting after the news broke, with each allegedly earning over $50,000. Prosecutors emphasized that although perpetual contracts are traded on blockchain derivative platforms, they still fall under accountable financial instruments.U.S. Attorney Jamie McDonald stated that corporate insiders cannot evade relevant securities and commodities market laws by trading perpetual contracts, tokenized securities, or other similar financial products. The 36-year-old Chai will appear in court in the Northern District of California, while the 30-year-old Xiang will appear in federal court in the Southern District of New York. The maximum penalty for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act they face is 10 years in prison, and for wire fraud, up to 20 years in prison. SDNY emphasized that the contents of the indictment at this stage are merely allegations, and both defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court.

first_img North Korea uses IT employees from third countries to infiltrate American companies, paying interview assistants with cryptocurrency

According to NBC, North Korea is utilizing remote IT workers from third countries such as Iran and Lebanon to assist in infiltrating American companies and obtaining funds to finance its weapons programs. Alerts issued by the U.S. and several foreign agencies in July indicated that North Korean IT workers "seek to sign contracts with the intention of remitting salaries back to relevant North Korean agencies," while also posing internal threats to companies, involving data leaks, cryptocurrency theft, and sensitive information theft.As governments like the United States increase countermeasures, North Korea is increasingly leveraging third-country IT workers to secure job interviews, and after obtaining work contracts, the relevant positions are typically taken over by North Korean agents. Reports indicate that these foreign IT workers are scouted on LinkedIn, with some earning about $500 per month in cryptocurrency to work part-time as "interview assistants."Cointelegraph reported in May, citing data from cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, that state-affiliated North Korean hackers and threat actors caused cryptocurrency losses exceeding $2 billion in 2025, a 51% increase year-on-year. The Bank of Korea estimates that despite facing global sanctions, North Korea's GDP will still grow by 3.5% in 2025.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.