Scan to download
BTC $73,220.78 -0.22%
ETH $2,005.19 -0.65%
BNB $639.66 -0.05%
XRP $1.31 -0.90%
SOL $81.63 -0.98%
TRX $0.3436 -2.62%
DOGE $0.0992 -0.62%
ADA $0.2309 -1.85%
BCH $302.61 +0.29%
LINK $8.93 -0.96%
HYPE $65.48 +8.68%
AAVE $81.69 +0.62%
SUI $0.8958 -4.02%
XLM $0.2184 +5.48%
ZEC $527.13 -4.49%
BTC $73,220.78 -0.22%
ETH $2,005.19 -0.65%
BNB $639.66 -0.05%
XRP $1.31 -0.90%
SOL $81.63 -0.98%
TRX $0.3436 -2.62%
DOGE $0.0992 -0.62%
ADA $0.2309 -1.85%
BCH $302.61 +0.29%
LINK $8.93 -0.96%
HYPE $65.48 +8.68%
AAVE $81.69 +0.62%
SUI $0.8958 -4.02%
XLM $0.2184 +5.48%
ZEC $527.13 -4.49%

manta

Superfortune: The leakage of the attacker's private key rather than address poisoning is not the work of an insider

Superfortune, incubated by Manta, recently released an update on the X platform regarding a security incident, stating that the attack was not carried out by internal personnel and that no team members were involved. The claim about the team secretly selling tokens is incorrect. The team has also not had any contact with Web3Port.The investigation confirmed that the attack was not due to address poisoning, but rather a leak of the signer's private key. The attacker independently held the private key and submitted a transaction with a forged address 43 minutes after the correct transaction. The forged address shares the first and last four characters with the correct address (starting with 0x70AE and ending with 5C15) to disguise itself in the Safe interface preview. The stolen funds are fully traceable and are currently stored in three cold wallets on Ethereum, containing approximately 2784 ETH, along with about 170,000 USDT that were cross-chain transferred out.The attacker also created a large number of counterfeit addresses and sent false transfer events to these addresses using Unicode-forged token symbols in an attempt to confuse tracking. This counterfeit address construction technique is the same as the method used when attacking this project. The attacker had pre-built a large-scale infrastructure, indicating that this was an industrialized operation rather than an opportunistic attack.

Manta co-founder: Market makers are all pests, and if there is real demand, they can only lend out at most 0.2% of the coins

ChainCatcher news, Manta Network co-founder Victor Ji posted on X: "We basically receive invitations every day from so-called proactive market makers and OTC for buying coins and acquisitions, and my attitude is to just stay put. Market makers, whether proactive or passive, are in my eyes blood-sucking parasites; they don't pay any attention to the fundamentals of the projects at all. However, every time there's a meeting, these people are very active in organizing events, and the bosses are also extremely wealthy. Why? Because this money comes from the project's community. If in this industry, more and more funds do not pay attention to fundamentals, then this industry will collapse faster and faster, and market makers are the most blatant group that ignores fundamentals. I believe that liquidity comes from real community trading; whether you are bullish or bearish, it is a natural market. If market makers are willing to participate, you can buy coins in the market to gain positions."Victor Ji added: "If some project founders are worried about insufficient liquidity but are unwilling to spend money on retainers, then my suggestion is to consider a loan, but the size must be minimal. In the early days of the Polkadot era, Calamari was asked by Three Arrows to provide over 3% of tokens, and these guys immediately sold the coins, while claiming to be very legit and that they would never sell the coins. A real loan only requires no more than 0.2% of the coins. Because think about it, if you need 200k for a 2% depth, that’s already a lot; 0.2% of the coins must exceed that value. If market makers want more coins, aren't they just here to dump?"
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.