BTC $64,575.46 +0.75%
ETH $1,870.30 +1.52%
BNB $569.69 -0.06%
XRP $1.09 +0.76%
SOL $76.09 +1.52%
TRX $0.3269 +1.35%
DOGE $0.0724 +0.38%
ADA $0.1658 +1.03%
BCH $216.89 -0.98%
LINK $8.36 +1.08%
HYPE $60.82 +2.57%
AAVE $89.48 +0.63%
SUI $0.7498 +2.07%
XLM $0.1902 +1.62%
ZEC $550.45 -0.67%
BTC $64,575.46 +0.75%
ETH $1,870.30 +1.52%
BNB $569.69 -0.06%
XRP $1.09 +0.76%
SOL $76.09 +1.52%
TRX $0.3269 +1.35%
DOGE $0.0724 +0.38%
ADA $0.1658 +1.03%
BCH $216.89 -0.98%
LINK $8.36 +1.08%
HYPE $60.82 +2.57%
AAVE $89.48 +0.63%
SUI $0.7498 +2.07%
XLM $0.1902 +1.62%
ZEC $550.45 -0.67%

w

All
Article
Flash

David Sacks: Opposes using regulatory uncertainty to suppress open-source AI, warns that the AI duopoly is seeking to eliminate competition

David Sacks, Chairman of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, stated on the X platform that using regulatory uncertainty as a competitive tool is "completely unacceptable." Regulatory decisions should be based on facts, logic, and evidence, rather than deliberately creating fear and uncertainty (FUD). He is unsure whether venture capitalist and AI policy researcher Dean Ball is acknowledging a strategy of "regulatory capture" or merely predicting that such a situation will occur. However, in any case, the practice of issuing "soft law" warnings through regulatory agencies to create market panic, thereby forcing regulated companies away from Chinese open-source models, should not be accepted.David Sacks pointed out that Dean Ball believes there is no need to directly ban Chinese open-source models; it is sufficient to guide regulatory agencies to issue relevant warnings, which can influence corporate decision-making by creating enough doubt and uncertainty, and these reasons "do not even need to be very substantial." Any regulatory decision must have sufficient basis, rather than implementing policies by "artificially creating doubt." He warned that this practice of circumventing public deliberation procedures not only undermines the foundation of the rule of law but may also open the door to regulatory abuse against any company or individual in the future.David Sacks further stated that current AI policy is at a critical turning point. Leading closed-source laboratories, which have already formed a duopoly in AI model revenue, are attempting to use government power to eliminate open-source competitors. He called on other companies and developers in Silicon Valley that still support open competition to make clear statements to jointly maintain an open ecosystem in the field of AI.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.