Scan to download
BTC $77,187.74 +3.17%
ETH $2,419.88 +3.50%
BNB $644.35 +2.09%
XRP $1.48 +3.25%
SOL $88.85 +0.65%
TRX $0.3270 +0.07%
DOGE $0.0990 +0.76%
ADA $0.2572 +0.48%
BCH $453.99 +0.17%
LINK $9.58 +1.60%
HYPE $44.96 +2.68%
AAVE $115.36 +1.48%
SUI $0.9934 -0.01%
XLM $0.1734 +3.95%
ZEC $334.54 -1.82%
BTC $77,187.74 +3.17%
ETH $2,419.88 +3.50%
BNB $644.35 +2.09%
XRP $1.48 +3.25%
SOL $88.85 +0.65%
TRX $0.3270 +0.07%
DOGE $0.0990 +0.76%
ADA $0.2572 +0.48%
BCH $453.99 +0.17%
LINK $9.58 +1.60%
HYPE $44.96 +2.68%
AAVE $115.36 +1.48%
SUI $0.9934 -0.01%
XLM $0.1734 +3.95%
ZEC $334.54 -1.82%

accusations

Bittensor co-founder responds to Covenant AI's accusations: no authority to suspend subnet emissions, and the amount sold is less than 1% of the investment

Bittensor co-founder Const (@const_reborn) responded on Twitter to recent allegations regarding Covenant AI. Const stated that he has no authority to pause emissions, and that the previous sale of a portion of alpha positions in three subnetworks was because these subnetworks were not operational and were in a high ratio of code destruction state. The impact of this transaction on emissions is consistent with the buying and selling behavior of ordinary TAO holders, and he does not enjoy any special privileges.Regarding management authority, Const clarified that it was Samuel himself who abandoned his Discord channel, and he did not remove his administrator role; he only temporarily restricted his ability to delete posts that honestly criticize and then restored it. Additionally, he emphasized that the scale of the token sell-off was less than 1% of his total investment in the team, and stated that exercising the rights to buy and sell tokens under the dTao system is fundamental to supporting the operation of the system.According to previous reports from ChainCatcher, the main subnetwork developer on Bittensor, Covenant AI, announced its withdrawal from Bittensor. Covenant AI founder Sam Dare stated that the reason Bittensor attracts builders, miners, validators, and investors into this ecosystem is because of its promise not to be controlled by any single entity. But this promise is a lie.

Hyperliquid clarifies false accusations: the platform's status is transparently verifiable, will gradually decentralize, and ultimately be fully open source

Hyperliquid officially clarifies a recent article that made false accusations against it, claiming that Hyperliquid has issues with solvency, integrity, and transparency. The responses to the 10 specific allegations are as follows:System under-collateralized by $362 million: False. The author of the article ignored HyperEVM USDC (parallel to the Arbitrum bridge), with the current total USDC amount being $4.351 billion.Manipulating trading volume through TestnetSetYesterdayUserVlm: False. This is only a testnet feature and cannot be called on the mainnet.Certain users have privileges, such as fee waivers or manipulation affecting airdrops: False. All fees, balances, and transactions are visible on-chain, with no distortion mechanisms.CoreWriter "God mode" can mint, transfer funds, etc.: False. This is a way to send HyperCore operations to HyperEVM smart contracts, with no described privileges.Governance can freeze the chain, with no revocation function: Misunderstanding. Freezing is used for network upgrades, similar to hard forks on other chains. During the POPCAT event in November 2025, L1 was not frozen, only the Arbitrum bridge was automatically locked as a security measure.A single private key can instantly set oracle prices: Misunderstanding. The HIP-3 oracle is configured by the deployer and can use MPC, etc. The perpetual contracts operated by validators use a weighted median price, with no delays to ensure security.Eight undisclosed addresses control all transaction submissions: False. Some transactions have been sent directly by validators, and future upgrades will include MEV and anti-censorship mechanisms.The liquidation cartel has an unfair advantage: Misunderstanding. Only HLP can back liquidations, and deposits are permissionless, with most liquidations processed through the order book.Hidden lending protocols involving over $1 million in funds: False. Portfolio margin, lending, and HLP are publicly announced pre-alpha versions, with documentation on file.ModifyNonCirculatingSupply can change token supply: False. The HIP-1 token supply is fixed, and this function is only for display purposes, not affecting execution.

KuanDe Investment responds to the accusation of "brain-machine weapon persecution": the content mentioned is false

ChainCatcher news, according to Jinshi Data reports, the news about "a certain employee of the well-known quantitative private equity firm KuanDe Investment accusing the company of using brain-machine weapons to persecute employees on social media" is continuing to ferment in the private equity circle.In response to the above "accusation," KuanDe Investment stated: "The company has noticed inappropriate remarks about it appearing on online platforms. After verification, the publisher of these remarks did indeed have a short-term employment with the company (joined in July 2022 and voluntarily left in early September of the same year, with an employment period of about 1 month). Currently, this publisher has terminated their employment relationship with the company, and their remarks are personal behavior, containing false and misleading information."Previous news reported that an unknown programmer named "Hu LeZhi" burned 600 ETH and donated over 1411 ETH to a charity organization. The information mentioned that with the large-scale military deployment of brain-machine chips, all military power controls citizens through base stations, radio, and nano brain-machine chips, calling for public attention to this new type of crime, warning that if one becomes a victim of this process, they may choose to end their own life.

Solv co-founders respond to public attacks: The accusations regarding Solv's asset security issues are incorrect and self-contradictory

ChainCatcher news, BTCFi project Solv Protocol co-founder Ryan Chow stated, "After experiencing a whole day of baseless public opinion attacks regarding '1,800 RUG' and 'private agreements' yesterday, today Solv has faced even more absurd accusations. These accusations invariably target the core asset security issues, but their basis is erroneous and contradictory, attempting to mislead the public through confusion. In response, we have decided to address these claims head-on and shatter these false statements with facts."Regarding the accusation from Nubit co-founder Hans about the misappropriation of the underlying BTC of SolvBTC.BBN, Chow pointed out that the mempool transactions cited by the other party are actually routine operations of SolvBTC.CORE. According to the project mechanism, SolvBTC.CORE needs to re-stake BTC to a new script address every half month, with the last staking occurring on December 19, and the extraction and re-staking taking place on January 2, which is also the reason for updating the address to DeFiLlama.Additionally, in response to the doubts about the decline in TVL of SolvBTC.BBN during Babylon Cap3, Chow stated that this is due to the project initiating a normal redemption mechanism, which precisely reflects the product's liquidity and flexibility. At the same time, he also refuted market speculation regarding the "BTC three flowers," which suggests that the same BTC is counted three times in the TVL.Chow emphasized that as a project that has been deeply engaged for four years, Solv is facing such a meticulously planned attack during the sensitive period leading up to the TGE (Token Generation Event), and has provided ample on-chain evidence and technical documentation to support its position, inviting the market and users to make their own judgments.

KuCoin CEO: The accusations against KuCoin by the U.S. are typical growth and regulatory issues faced by the crypto industry

ChainCatcher news, according to Coin Edition, KuCoin CEO Johnny Lyu stated that the recent accusations from the U.S. government are not unique to KuCoin, but rather typical growth and regulatory issues faced by emerging industries. It is not far-fetched to see regulatory gaps in the early stages of industries like cryptocurrency, and as the industry matures, the cryptocurrency sector will move towards compliance and standardization.Lyu revealed that last Friday, KuCoin became the first global exchange registered with India's financial intelligence agency. "This reflects our respect for local regulations and our proactive compliance with the rules."Previously, information disclosed on the U.S. Department of Justice website indicated that KuCoin and its two founders CHUN GAN (also known as "Michael") and KE TANG (also known as "Eric") were accused of violating the Bank Secrecy Act and unauthorized money transmission. It is reported that the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District and the Department of Homeland Security Investigations announced the unsealing of the indictment, accusing KuCoin of violating the Bank Secrecy Act and willfully violating anti-money laundering laws. The individuals involved are still at large.KuCoin posted on the X platform stating that KuCoin is currently operating well, user assets are secure, and they are aware of the related reports, and are currently investigating the details through their lawyers. KuCoin respects the laws and regulations of various countries and strictly adheres to compliance standards.
2024-03-27
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.