BTC $77,752.64 -3.29%
ETH $2,443.11 -2.84%
BNB $691.23 -3.15%
XRP $1.38 -4.49%
SOL $104.02 -5.03%
TRX $0.3410 +0.93%
DOGE $0.0851 -4.47%
ADA $0.2027 -5.37%
BCH $246.21 -8.74%
LINK $11.45 -4.39%
HYPE $80.31 -4.52%
AAVE $122.04 -5.74%
SUI $0.7432 -5.07%
XLM $0.1790 -4.24%
ZEC $801.84 -1.21%
BTC $77,752.64 -3.29%
ETH $2,443.11 -2.84%
BNB $691.23 -3.15%
XRP $1.38 -4.49%
SOL $104.02 -5.03%
TRX $0.3410 +0.93%
DOGE $0.0851 -4.47%
ADA $0.2027 -5.37%
BCH $246.21 -8.74%
LINK $11.45 -4.39%
HYPE $80.31 -4.52%
AAVE $122.04 -5.74%
SUI $0.7432 -5.07%
XLM $0.1790 -4.24%
ZEC $801.84 -1.21%

mat

All
Article
Flash

DWF Ventures: The rapid rise of social trading, platform competition is shifting from trade execution to social networks and information advantages

DWF Ventures released a report stating that as trading fees continue to approach zero, social trading is becoming a new direction for financial trading platforms to compete for users and build moats.The rise of social trading stems from users seeking validation from others and references for investment decisions. From early brokerage copy trading to investment communities like Reddit and Stocktwits, and now to platforms that combine real position verification, trading signals, and social relationships, social trading is evolving from a simple copy trading tool into a product form that integrates trading, content, and social interaction. As trade execution becomes increasingly homogenized, the future competitive advantage of platforms may come more from network effects, resources of well-known traders, and exclusive information and distribution capabilities.Analysis suggests that social trading platforms are forming a clear growth flywheel: platforms attract well-known traders and their fans, traders build reputations through public trading, fans amplify market influence by following trades, which in turn increases the visibility of traders and the user base of the platform. Public calls for trades may even generate a certain "self-fulfilling" effect in this process.Platforms also lower the entry barriers for users through one-click trading, low-threshold acceptance, trading competitions, and fee incentives, and leverage the social influence of top traders to facilitate user migration. In the future, the social trading ecosystem in the cryptocurrency and traditional stock sectors may further integrate, and platforms that master trader, user attention, and information flow are expected to form stronger network effects.However, social trading also faces significant structural risks. Data shows that among approximately 292,000 wallets analyzed by the Fomo platform over the past three months, only 6.16% achieved profitability based on realized gains. Followers lack independent investment logic and are easily influenced by herd behavior, while there may also be conflicts of interest between traders and followers.Furthermore, even if platforms can verify public positions, traders may still establish undisclosed positions through other wallets, making information asymmetry difficult to eliminate completely. Analysis suggests that as the boundaries between trading and entertainment continue to blur, platforms that can establish unique information layers, gather quality traders, and form network effects may gain an advantage in the competitive social trading market.

MANTRA announces the review of the attack incident: A down-scaling vulnerability led to the transfer of over 720 million tokens, with approximately 37.96 million tokens frozen

On August 20, MANTRA Chain released a complete review report of the security incident, confirming that the attacker exploited an unsigned integer underflow vulnerability in the balance accounting layer of the upstream dependency cosmos/evm, unauthorizedly transferring a total of 720,923,967.99 MANTRA from two addresses, valued at approximately 3.6 million dollars based on the price before the attack. Among them, the attacker transferred 600,000,035.56 MANTRA from the on-chain burn address and 120,923,932.44 MANTRA from a genesis-era multi-signature address related to an early incentive program.MANTRA stated that this incident did not involve the leakage of validator keys, administrator privileges, governance control, or multi-signature signers; the attacker did not require privileged access and could complete the attack solely through unauthorized contract deployment and self-funded wallets. The first abnormal transfer occurred at 19:06 UTC on August 20, when the attacker transferred approximately 600 million MANTRA from the burn address; subsequently, at 22:59 UTC, another transfer of approximately 120.9 million MANTRA was made. The chain subsequently stopped operating at 23:13 UTC and resumed after upgrading to v8.4.0. The entire network interruption lasted for 30 hours and 13 minutes.This vulnerability was not an issue with MANTRA's self-developed code but originated from the cosmos/evm module, which is responsible for providing EVM functionality on the Cosmos SDK. The vulnerability allowed the attacker to execute unsigned balance deductions without checking if the balance was sufficient, causing an overflow of values and bypassing normal account authorization logic. MANTRA stated that as of today, no funds have been recovered, with approximately 37.96 million MANTRA (accounting for 5.27% of the total transferred) still remaining in the attacker's address, which has been frozen due to the chain's suspension and v8.4.0 restrictions. The remaining funds have flowed to related trading platforms, and the recovery efforts have entered the law enforcement investigation stage. In the future, monitoring of accounts that cannot normally authorize transfers, burn addresses, and other historically "non-transferable" addresses will be strengthened, and efforts will be made to promote improvements in the security vulnerability disclosure process within the Cosmos ecosystem.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.