BTC $83,452.53 -1.24%
ETH $2,656.40 -1.60%
BNB $771.90 -0.07%
XRP $1.50 -1.35%
SOL $120.26 -0.71%
TRX $0.3333 +0.16%
DOGE $0.0948 -1.54%
ADA $0.2521 -0.04%
BCH $315.44 -5.27%
LINK $14.05 -0.68%
HYPE $90.18 -3.30%
AAVE $151.13 -2.69%
SUI $1.25 +6.40%
XLM $0.2141 -0.28%
ZEC $1,569.29 -4.57%
AAPL $340.18 -0.06%
AMZN $248.88 -0.29%
GOOGL $342.16 -0.30%
MSFT $516.66 -0.20%
META $733.84 -1.81%
NVDA $223.98 -0.21%
TSLA $370.47 -0.51%
SNDK $1,737.57 -1.92%
INTC $119.75 -3.24%
SPCX $149.04 +0.33%
MU $1,068.45 -1.93%
AMD $618.53 -1.61%
BTC $83,452.53 -1.24%
ETH $2,656.40 -1.60%
BNB $771.90 -0.07%
XRP $1.50 -1.35%
SOL $120.26 -0.71%
TRX $0.3333 +0.16%
DOGE $0.0948 -1.54%
ADA $0.2521 -0.04%
BCH $315.44 -5.27%
LINK $14.05 -0.68%
HYPE $90.18 -3.30%
AAVE $151.13 -2.69%
SUI $1.25 +6.40%
XLM $0.2141 -0.28%
ZEC $1,569.29 -4.57%
AAPL $340.18 -0.06%
AMZN $248.88 -0.29%
GOOGL $342.16 -0.30%
MSFT $516.66 -0.20%
META $733.84 -1.81%
NVDA $223.98 -0.21%
TSLA $370.47 -0.51%
SNDK $1,737.57 -1.92%
INTC $119.75 -3.24%
SPCX $149.04 +0.33%
MU $1,068.45 -1.93%
AMD $618.53 -1.61%

sat

All
Article
Flash

DyorSwap: The previously identified "GIWA Mainnet" is actually a fake chain built by scammers, and compensation for affected users will be provided through treasury funds

DyorSwap officially announced that the so-called "GIWA Mainnet" identified by the team earlier is actually a fake chain set up by scammers. This fake network used the correct GIWA chain ID (9134), making it appear legitimate during the initial verification phase. The team also identified several suspicious messages and individuals within the related community that may be connected to this incident. The announcement stated that significant losses have occurred due to this fraudulent cross-chain bridge.DyorSwap stated that it is taking three immediate actions: first, contacting a professional security team to conduct further on-chain tracking and investigate the involved addresses, transactions, and fund flows; second, preserving all relevant evidence, including chat records, RPC information, cross-chain bridge addresses, and on-chain transactions; third, preparing to use treasury funds to compensate affected users, with eligibility criteria, loss verification processes, compensation scope, and detailed plans to be announced after the investigation and verification processes are completed.DyorSwap emphasized that until further notice, users should not use any unofficial GIWA mainnet RPCs, cross-chain bridges, or contracts, and should not send funds to any related addresses. The official team deeply apologizes to every affected user in this incident and states that subsequent updates will be released as soon as possible.

DyorSwap: The previously identified "GIWA Mainnet" is actually a fake chain built by scammers, and compensation for affected users will be provided through national treasury funds

DyorSwap officially announced that the so-called "GIWA mainnet" previously identified by the team is actually a fake chain set up by scammers. This fake network used the correct GIWA chain ID (9134), making it appear legitimate during the initial verification phase. The team also identified several suspicious messages and individuals within the related community that may be connected to this incident. The announcement stated that significant losses have occurred due to this fraudulent cross-chain bridge.DyorSwap stated that it is taking three immediate actions: first, contacting a professional security team to conduct further on-chain tracking and investigate the involved addresses, transactions, and fund flows; second, preserving all relevant evidence, including chat records, RPC information, cross-chain bridge addresses, and on-chain transactions; third, preparing to use treasury funds to compensate affected users, with eligibility criteria, loss verification processes, compensation scope, and detailed plans to be announced after the investigation and verification processes are completed.DyorSwap emphasized that until further notice, users should not use any unofficial GIWA mainnet RPCs, cross-chain bridges, or contracts, and should not send funds to any related addresses. The official team deeply apologizes to every affected user in this incident and states that subsequent updates will be released as soon as possible.

first_img OpenAI is facing a class-action lawsuit, accused of allowing outsourced personnel to read ChatGPT conversations

Two ChatGPT users from California filed a proposed class action lawsuit against OpenAI in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California this month, accusing the company of failing to adequately inform users that their real conversations were being handed over to external contractors for processing. The lawsuit was served to OpenAI on September 2, focusing on its internal initiative Project Lily. According to the complaint, "AI data reviewers" and "chatbot evaluators" recruited through a third-party staffing company read real ChatGPT prompts and complete conversations, summarize user intent, and score and comment on responses from four models on a scale of 1 to 7.This process is known in the industry as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which is a fundamental method for enhancing chatbot capabilities. The complaint states that users were never explicitly informed that a person, rather than a machine, might be reading their conversations. OpenAI filters conversations through an automated system before human review, but the complaint alleges that the filters cannot intercept all content, and personal details sometimes still reach contractors. 404 Media first reported on the project on September 14 and found that the reviewers' dashboard included "user memory summaries," which could expose users' approximate locations, occupations, or private life information, even though usernames had been removed.OpenAI stated that such reviews aim to reduce two behaviors: chatbots behaving too much like humans and overly catering to users, referred to by researchers as "flattery." The complaint raises eight legal claims, including violations of California's Unfair Competition Law, Consumer Privacy Act, and common law claims for intrusion into private affairs, with the plaintiffs seeking damages, restitution of unjust enrichment, and punitive damages.

first_img VanEck rated the executive compensation of Metaplanet as "poor," with dilution risks far exceeding those of peers

On Friday, asset management company VanEck released a report on the compensation of executives at the top ten digital asset treasury companies, rating the compensation structure of the Japanese Bitcoin treasury company Metaplanet as "poor," making it the only company to fall into the lowest rating. The report shows that Metaplanet's equity plan corresponds to 14.7% of fully diluted shares, with executive risk exposure at 8.2%, which is ten times the average level of 0.8% for the other nine companies, and the scale of the equity plan is also nearly four times the industry average.In comparison, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder, Strategy, has an equity plan that accounts for only 2% of fully diluted shares, with executive risk exposure at 0.5%, and its compensation structure rated as "good." Metaplanet currently ranks third among publicly listed companies in Bitcoin holdings with 43,000 BTC. VanEck pointed out that the gap partly stems from Metaplanet's previous compensation mechanism: the option pool automatically expanded when the company issued shares to purchase Bitcoin, causing it to swell from 46 million shares to 319.5 million shares, adding approximately 273 million potential shares, which drew criticism from shareholders at the time.Metaplanet terminated the automatic adjustment mechanism at the end of August and reduced the option pool by 41% to 188.2 million shares in September, but VanEck believes these adjustments are still "far from satisfactory," calling for the retraction of the expansion of approximately 273 million shares in favor of a shareholder-approved compensation plan, while also suggesting that executive compensation be linked to the number of Bitcoins corresponding to each fully diluted share and adopting a written grant timing policy.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.