BTC $83,106.07 +1.02%
ETH $2,507.65 -0.01%
BNB $741.42 -0.21%
XRP $1.37 +1.30%
SOL $107.87 +0.45%
TRX $0.3286 -0.37%
DOGE $0.0846 +0.07%
ADA $0.2377 -1.38%
BCH $273.73 +0.22%
LINK $12.94 +0.41%
HYPE $81.45 -1.90%
AAVE $161.99 +0.87%
SUI $1.05 -0.61%
XLM $0.1926 -1.43%
ZEC $1,219.59 -0.55%
AAPL $342.26 +0.48%
AMZN $259.57 -0.08%
GOOGL $354.98 +0.40%
MSFT $546.03 +0.97%
META $766.67 +2.96%
NVDA $227.98 +0.61%
TSLA $374.94 -1.05%
SNDK $1,450.98 -2.07%
INTC $102.35 +1.31%
SPCX $156.72 -4.54%
MU $939.59 -4.90%
AMD $599.66 +1.31%
BTC $83,106.07 +1.02%
ETH $2,507.65 -0.01%
BNB $741.42 -0.21%
XRP $1.37 +1.30%
SOL $107.87 +0.45%
TRX $0.3286 -0.37%
DOGE $0.0846 +0.07%
ADA $0.2377 -1.38%
BCH $273.73 +0.22%
LINK $12.94 +0.41%
HYPE $81.45 -1.90%
AAVE $161.99 +0.87%
SUI $1.05 -0.61%
XLM $0.1926 -1.43%
ZEC $1,219.59 -0.55%
AAPL $342.26 +0.48%
AMZN $259.57 -0.08%
GOOGL $354.98 +0.40%
MSFT $546.03 +0.97%
META $766.67 +2.96%
NVDA $227.98 +0.61%
TSLA $374.94 -1.05%
SNDK $1,450.98 -2.07%
INTC $102.35 +1.31%
SPCX $156.72 -4.54%
MU $939.59 -4.90%
AMD $599.66 +1.31%

台州

全部
文章
快讯

帮人炒“泰达币”亏了十几万?台州市黄岩区人民法院:合同无效,全数返还

链捕手消息,近日台州市黄岩法院审结一起委托合同纠纷案件,黄甲经人介绍与张乙签订了《数字货币量化委托协议书》一份,约定黄甲以个人名义转账给张乙20万元用于购买泰达币(USDT),由张乙投资运作,协议到期后保底归还黄甲合同签订时购买的等量数字货币;张乙定期向黄甲结算相应收益,合同到期时结算所委托的数字货币;协议期限为一年。然而,市场行情并未像黄甲预期的那般良好,张乙亦无法控制虚拟货币市场的行情变化,陆陆续续返还给黄甲投资款95760元,剩下的款项迟迟未能返还给,眼见投资回本无望的黄甲将张乙起诉到了法院,要求其返还投资款,并赔偿相应的利息损失。   台州市黄岩区人民法院裁定,本案案涉标的物本身不具有合法性,故原、被告关于该交易物的委托托管行为亦不受法律保护,因此原、被告签订的《数字货币量化委托协议书》属于无效合同。被告依无效合同取得的财产应当返还给原告,被告应返还原告剩余的104240元投资款。原告应当明知虚拟货币的投资不受国家法律所保护,而仍然委托被告进行投资,本身存在过错,故其请求赔偿利息等损失的主张于法无据,不予支持。(来源链接)
app_icon
ChainCatcher 与创新者共建Web3世界