Coinbase's official silence, regulatory red lines remain unchanged: Is China really open for registration?

Author: Chloe, ChainCatcher

On July 14, 2026, multiple community users tested and found that Coinbase, the largest compliant exchange in the United States, has opened registration for Chinese users, supporting KYC completion with "second-generation ID cards" paired with +86 phone numbers, with some users passing the initial review within a minute. Wu confirmed the validity of this information with Coinbase employees, but the official has yet to release any formal announcement.

However, this door is only half open: accounts currently only support on-chain deposits, withdrawals, and trading, and do not support fiat currency deposits or withdrawals via bank cards. Users can only receive deposits of stablecoins like USDT through on-chain addresses. This article compiles the details of the event and proposes a motivation hypothesis centered around Deribit, in contrast to the regulatory red lines that have never loosened in Beijing, as well as the risk list that Chinese users must face.

Coinbase has yet to release any announcements

On July 14, Beijing time, screenshots of users testing the registration opening for Chinese users began circulating on social media. Users can quickly complete KYC verification using a Chinese "second-generation ID card" paired with a "+86 phone number." According to tests by users in the X community, the preliminary review can be completed within a minute, and no additional proof of overseas address is required during the initial review stage.

Feedback from tests on the V2EX forum provided more details: the entire process takes about five minutes, and registering with an ID card can waive the address proof requirement; if a passport is used instead, the system will require uploading address proof documents. Some users confirmed that the platform indeed allows new user registrations, with identity verification taking about a minute to complete.

Additionally, reports indicate that Coinbase employees have also confirmed that users can now use Chinese resident ID cards and complete identity verification with a mainland Chinese address; previously, the process required registration and certification using a Chinese passport paired with a Hong Kong address. In other words, this is a substantial adjustment to the verification policy, rather than a frontend error.

However, Coinbase has yet to release any announcements or specify which products will be available after registration. Its publicly available identity verification documents still only list passports as acceptable documents for China, without showing options for ID cards or Chinese addresses. This state of having the frontend online, documents unsynchronized, and a complete lack of announcements suggests that this move may be a gray area expansion or a deliberately low-profile limited opening.

Accounts that only allow deposits: What can and cannot be done

For Chinese users, the actual use of this account has clear boundaries. According to tests by V2EX users, Chinese users can currently only conduct on-chain deposits, withdrawals, and trading, and bank fiat currency deposits are not supported. In other words, RMB cannot be deposited or withdrawn through bank cards or third-party payments on Coinbase; the only funding channel is through on-chain addresses: users transfer USDT, USDC, or other crypto assets to their Coinbase address from other wallets or platforms and then trade on the platform.

This aligns with Coinbase's compliance framework. Its support policy allows the company to restrict deposits, purchases, or other account functions when local regulations do not permit a certain service. Opening registration and identity verification does not automatically equate to opening all trading pairs, payment methods, and fiat currency services.

The verification process itself also has time limits. New registered accounts have limited functionality until identity verification is completed, and users need to upload government-issued documents through the official verification portal. The platform typically completes the review within 24 hours, and will periodically require re-verification for record-keeping, compliance, and anti-fraud purposes. For Chinese users, this means that each re-verification is a point in time when the account status is reassessed.

Why now: Three clues pointing to Deribit

The following motivation analysis is mainly compiled from the views of X user Phyrex (@PhyrexNi). Why would an exchange known for compliance, which has long listed China as a restricted area, choose to break the ice at this time? These insights are conjectures, not official statements from Coinbase, but three verifiable clues point to the same answer: Deribit.

Clue One: U.S. law does not prohibit it, and China is difficult to regulate

One of Coinbase's compliance bottom lines is not to provide services to countries and regions sanctioned by the U.S. OFAC, and China is not on that list. Therefore, even if China itself prohibits cryptocurrency trading, providing account opening services to Chinese users does not violate U.S. law. Conversely, from China's perspective, Coinbase does violate domestic prohibitions on foreign exchanges providing services to domestic residents; however, Coinbase has no physical presence in China, making enforcement difficult.

Comments from the Chinese community point out that China has previously penalized foreign-registered brokerages (such as Tiger Brokers), and theoretically, the same logic could apply to Coinbase, but the difficulty of cross-border enforcement is clearly higher. This back-and-forth may have left room for Coinbase to attempt.

Clue Two: Deribit has written the value of the Chinese market into its financial report

The real opportunity may be Deribit. Coinbase completed the acquisition of this crypto derivatives exchange on August 14, 2025. Deribit has always had a high proportion of Asian and Chinese users, and although specific data has never been disclosed, the value of this user segment has been clearly quantified: in the 10-Q document submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, Deribit's "customer relationships" intangible assets were separately valued at approximately $1.059 billion, with an amortization period of 15 years.

In other words, Coinbase paid a book value in the billion-dollar range for Deribit's existing customer relationships, which includes a large number of Chinese users. Opening registration for Chinese users may be a natural extension of this investment.

Clue Three: KYC integration makes Chinese users a part of the options entry

Coinbase has clearly advanced the integration of Deribit accounts with its own KYC system: customers migrating from the Deribit international exchange do not need to redo KYC, and in the future, they can directly trade Deribit's options products within the Coinbase app.

Connecting this integration path with "opening KYC to Chinese users," the two matters form a line: opening accounts for Chinese users essentially lays the groundwork for Deribit's options business.

Currently, the crypto options exchange with the best liquidity depth remains Deribit. After integrating with Coinbase and promoting Coinbase options, it is effectively engaging in differentiated competition with competitors like Binance and OKX: first attracting Chinese users with Deribit's advantage in options, and then guiding options users to the futures and spot markets through subsidies and activities.

In the first quarter of 2025, Deribit brought Coinbase over 80% market share in Bitcoin options and over 90% in Ethereum options. This level of monopolistic market depth is the foundation for its differentiated competition.

The regulatory wall is gradually rising, and the market background is also unfavorable for relaxing restrictions

On the other side of Coinbase's opening is a regulatory wall that has only increased over the past five years. In September 2021, the People's Bank of China and ten other departments issued Document No. 237, clearly stating that activities related to virtual currencies are illegal financial activities, and that providing services to domestic residents through foreign exchanges via the internet is also deemed illegal financial activity, implementing long-arm jurisdiction. This red line is the background for Coinbase's long-standing classification of China as a restricted area.

Moreover, this wall has just been raised recently. On February 6, 2026, the People's Bank of China, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and eight other departments jointly issued a notice reiterating that domestic virtual currency-related activities are illegal financial activities, prohibiting the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) within the country, and clearly stating that without consent, no domestic or foreign entities or individuals may issue stablecoins pegged to the RMB overseas.

The regulatory authorities have also continuously expressed their stance externally. The Governor of the People's Bank of China, Pan Gongsheng, stated that stablecoins currently cannot effectively meet the basic requirements for customer identity verification and anti-money laundering; Wang Xin, the director of the research bureau, called for close attention to the impact of stablecoins on the international monetary system and cross-border payments at the Lujiazui Forum in June 2026.

The market background is also unfavorable for relaxing regulations. After Bitcoin reached a high of over $120,000 in October 2025, it briefly fell below $70,000 in February 2026, with official media emphasizing the risks of speculative trading.

In other words, this breaking of the ice is entirely a unilateral action by Coinbase. There are no signs of any loosening of China's ban on cryptocurrency trading or on foreign exchanges providing services to domestic residents.

Risk list: Four accounts users need to pay attention to

The first account is the risk of account existence. If the system later detects that the user's actual residence is in China, the account is very likely to face freezing or restrictions, and the fiat currency deposit and withdrawal functions will likely not work properly. In the absence of an official announcement, this registration channel itself could be closed at any time, and users cannot claim any promises based on it.

The second account is the risk of funding channels. The structure of only allowing deposits means that asset movement entirely relies on on-chain transfers. If the account is restricted while holding positions, users may not only be unable to withdraw fiat currency, but on-chain withdrawals may also require additional verification.

Coinbase is known for its strict compliance reviews. Comments from the Chinese community remind that it may require users to submit proof of asset sources, bank statements, etc.; if unable to provide these, the platform may not allow withdrawals, and the fees are relatively high compared to peers.

The third account is the legal and rights protection risk. According to Document No. 237 and the notice from eight departments in February 2026, civil actions related to virtual currency trading by domestic residents are not protected by law, and foreign exchanges providing services to domestic residents are considered illegal financial activities.

It is important to note a difference that is easily overlooked, and which Phyrex particularly reminds: Coinbase is sufficiently compliant in the U.S., but that does not mean Chinese users in China will be protected.

After the FTX incident, the lesson to be learned is that once a platform encounters problems, or users need to protect their rights, the difficulty of doing so is extremely high if the platform is not compliant in its own country. The claims process for FTX's Chinese users was exceptionally difficult. Compliance is an asset at the platform level, but it does not automatically translate into individual Chinese users' rights to claim.

The fourth account is the risk of information asymmetry. Currently, all details come from user tests and informal confirmations from employees, and official documents even contradict the frontend processes. Before Coinbase releases a formal announcement, any judgments about the scope of opening, product permissions, and duration are merely speculation.

Three indicators worth paying attention to next: whether the official releases an announcement and updates supporting documents, whether the ID card registration channel remains open, and whether the product permissions of restricted accounts gradually expand. The direction of these three indicators will determine whether this breaking of the ice is a test or the beginning of a new era.