BTC $78,341.38 -1.27%
ETH $2,478.44 -0.67%
BNB $747.84 +0.85%
XRP $1.42 +1.21%
SOL $102.96 -1.29%
TRX $0.3384 +1.17%
DOGE $0.0893 -1.09%
ADA $0.2202 -0.30%
BCH $255.87 -2.08%
LINK $12.55 -2.16%
HYPE $84.08 -1.61%
AAVE $128.81 -2.70%
SUI $0.8108 -2.43%
XLM $0.1879 -2.55%
ZEC $1,150.00 -1.19%
BTC $78,341.38 -1.27%
ETH $2,478.44 -0.67%
BNB $747.84 +0.85%
XRP $1.42 +1.21%
SOL $102.96 -1.29%
TRX $0.3384 +1.17%
DOGE $0.0893 -1.09%
ADA $0.2202 -0.30%
BCH $255.87 -2.08%
LINK $12.55 -2.16%
HYPE $84.08 -1.61%
AAVE $128.81 -2.70%
SUI $0.8108 -2.43%
XLM $0.1879 -2.55%
ZEC $1,150.00 -1.19%

cly

All
Article
Flash

Strive CEO: The company may become the world's second-largest publicly listed Bitcoin holder by the end of the year

Strive CEO Matt Cole stated that after increasing its holdings by 3,156 BTC in August, the company could potentially become the world's second-largest publicly traded Bitcoin holder by the end of 2026, second only to Strategy. However, he emphasized that this is not its baseline expectation and requires multiple factors to align.Cole pointed out that Strive currently has over $700 million in unexercised warrants, which will expire in mid-October. If the company's stock price exceeds the $27 exercise price, the conversion of the warrants could bring Strive hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for further Bitcoin purchases. He mentioned that if combined with approximately $700 million in digital credit capacity, the potential funds available for buying BTC could reach $1.4 billion.Strive significantly accelerated its buying pace in August, purchasing 3,156 BTC in a single month, compared to only 136 BTC in July. The company currently holds a total of 23,156 BTC, valued at nearly $1.9 billion, and has become the fifth-largest publicly traded Bitcoin treasury company in the world, surpassing the crypto exchange Bullish last week. The current second-largest publicly traded Bitcoin holder is Twenty One Capital, which holds 43,514 BTC, about twice that of Strive. With 17 weeks remaining until the end of the year, if Twenty One does not increase its holdings, Strive would need to purchase approximately 1,200 BTC per week on average to surpass it. The article noted that Twenty One has not added any BTC since July 2025, so this goal is theoretically possible.

Strive to become the 7th largest publicly traded company holding Bitcoin, with approximately 1.7 billion dollars in Bitcoin

Bitcoin News posted on the X platform that Strive Asset Management purchased 1,110 bitcoins for approximately $81.5 million, increasing its bitcoin holdings to 21,356 bitcoins. Based on a bitcoin price of about $80,000, the holdings are valued at approximately $1.7 billion, making it the seventh largest company by bitcoin reserves among publicly traded companies.According to documents submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Strive completed the purchase between August 17 and 21, with an average purchase price of $73,409 per bitcoin, including fees and related expenses. This purchase increased its bitcoin holdings by approximately 5.5% from the previous 20,246 bitcoins.Strive raised funds through the issuance of ASST common stock and SATA preferred stock to execute its bitcoin reserve strategy. During the same period, its Class A shares increased by approximately 3.65 million shares, reaching 79.89 million shares, and it issued 441,313 shares of SATA preferred stock. Due to the increase in the number of shares, Strive's total bitcoin holdings grew by approximately 5.5%, but the bitcoin holdings per fully diluted share only increased by about 1.4%.Strive CEO Matt Cole posted on the X platform that the company added 1,110 bitcoins at an average cost of $73,409 per bitcoin, bringing the total holdings to 21,356 bitcoins.Previously, in August, Strive purchased 147 bitcoins at an average price of over $64,800 per bitcoin, and subsequently purchased 79 bitcoins at an average price of $63,231 per bitcoin, totaling 226 bitcoins. In June, Strive purchased 2,500 bitcoins for $185.2 million, increasing its holdings to 19,000 bitcoins.As of August 21, Strive's cash and cash equivalents increased from approximately $154.8 million to $171.9 million. The price of SATA preferred stock is approximately $100, and the annualized dividend yield was raised to 13% in April.

first_img Sun Yuchen wins court support in WLFI dispute, personal claims to be publicly heard

Sun Yuchen stated that his lawyer recently appeared in federal court in California to oppose World Liberty Financial (@worldlibertyfi)'s request to force the dispute into confidential arbitration and seal documents. The court ruled that all of Sun Yuchen's personal claims will continue to be heard in open court; at the same time, it rejected the suggestion to submit all company-related claims to arbitration and required both parties to negotiate which claims will remain in court and which will go to arbitration. Sun Yuchen called this a significant victory, emphasizing that token holders have the right to know how the project treats its trusters.Sun Yuchen stated that as one of the earliest and largest investors in World Liberty, he invested $45 million to obtain $WLFI tokens. The lawsuit alleges that after this investment helped raise approximately $550 million in token sales, the project secretly embedded a backdoor in the smart contract that could unilaterally freeze, restrict, or destroy token holders' tokens, and based on this, illegally seized his tokens, even threatening him with criminal reports during his rights protection efforts. The lawsuit claims damages amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars. He has previously obtained a court injunction prohibiting the other party from destroying or disposing of his tokens.Sun Yuchen also stated that World Liberty similarly embedded backdoor capabilities in its USD1 stablecoin and mentioned that the project had pledged a large amount of $WLFI tokens as collateral in Dolomite lending, as well as public information regarding co-founder past lawsuits related to Dough Finance, expressing concerns about the project's solvency and transparency, urging investors to conduct their own due diligence and remain cautious. The above content is all his unilateral statements and accusations.

first_img Insiders: Hyperliquid core contributors have publicly sought feedback on the HIP-4 template

According to a post by @0xMaxs, Hyperliquid core contributor Xulian is publicly soliciting feedback on the latest testnet template for HIP-4. The template can be accessed via on-chain queries or the testnet API, with each template family identified by an incrementing integer suffix for the latest version. After collecting feedback, validators will review and vote on-chain, and only approved templates will be written to the mainnet for deployers to use; all template instantiations still depend on HIP-4 being enabled on the mainnet.It is reported that the testnet currently has 16 template records (including old versions), with approximately 12 latest templates based on the highest version of each family, covering 7 types of market structures. Candidate types include expiration prices (settled using specified period TWAP), price-triggered markets, range earnings, as well as central bank decisions, sports two-way options, and sports win/draw/loss, etc. The mainnet outcomeTemplates and deployer list are currently still empty, and permissionless templates have not yet been officially opened.HIP-4 is Hyperliquid's permissionless deployment standard for outcome/prediction markets, with the complete process being: community feedback, validator review, on-chain voting, template writing to the mainnet, and market creation by deployers once the switch is enabled.

BitMart employees publicly speak out: demand disclosure of platform asset status and repayment plan before August 19

Regarding the issues of BitMart users' asset withdrawal restrictions and employees' unpaid salaries and compensations, employees of the platform publicly called on BitMart's management and relevant responsible parties to respond publicly by August 19 regarding the whereabouts of user assets, the platform's reserve situation, the reasons for withdrawal restrictions, and employee salary compensations. The open letter pointed out that a large number of users are still unable to withdraw their assets normally, and some employees have not received their last month's salary and due compensation; against this backdrop, if the platform only responds with announcements such as "ceasing operations," it cannot resolve the actual problems faced by users and employees. Relevant individuals requested that BitMart publicly disclose wallet, asset, liability, and available reserve information that can be verified by third parties, and explain when the platform became aware of the funding and withdrawal issues, who made the relevant decisions, and whether it continued to encourage users to redeem or trade despite being aware of the risks.The open letter also called for an investigation into related accounts, affiliated companies, trusts, and other funding arrangements associated with BitMart user assets, and specifically requested that the founder's partner provide explanations regarding their related accounts and funding situation. The open letter stated that there is currently information pending further verification indicating that BitMart accounts related to the founder's partner may have held assets worth tens of millions of dollars and have records of batch withdrawals; relevant individuals emphasized that no criminal characterization will be made against any individual until evidence is fully verified, but they demanded public clarification on whether the aforementioned accounts exist, asset ownership, sources of funds, transfer directions, and whether there is any connection with BitMart user assets, and called for an independent investigation into the relevant fund flows. At the same time, the open letter requested that BitMart promptly settle the salaries and compensations owed to employees, asserting that ordinary employees should not bear the consequences of management's operational decisions.In addition, the open letter requested that BitMart publish a user repayment plan with a clear execution timeline by August 19, including the scale of remaining assets, total liabilities, expected recovery ratio for users, repayment order, start and completion times, and supervision mechanisms, and explicitly stated acceptance of third-party independent audits. The open letter indicated that if a complete, transparent, and verifiable asset explanation and repayment plan are not obtained by then, they will consider submitting existing materials, funding clues, and relevant evidence to law enforcement agencies, regulatory authorities, lawyers, and the media in various locations to promote further investigation.

hot_img OpenAI publicly responds to Apple's lawsuit: describes it as "careless, aggressive, and personal," stating that Apple mistakenly sent a lawyer's letter and confused the recipient

OpenAI issued a public statement on August 3 in response to the lawsuit filed by Apple. OpenAI described Apple's lawsuit as "careless, aggressive, and personal," and pointed out several factual inaccuracies: an external lawyer from Apple mistakenly sent an email intended for someone else to OpenAI's legal head, falsely claiming that the two parties had spoken over the phone; Apple later admitted it was due to "confusing two Asian surnames." OpenAI also revealed that after contacting Apple in February, Apple stated it was "working to resolve any issues," but then did not communicate for 5 months until filing the lawsuit.Regarding the allegations against former Apple employee Chang Liu for taking confidential information, OpenAI presented iMessage records from after his departure showing that Apple colleagues had proactively contacted him to request assistance in locating documents, and acknowledged that this was a common issue caused by Apple's "poor management of exit access." Another named executive, Tang Tan, had worked at Apple for over 24 years, and OpenAI stated that he had consistently required his team "not to use any confidential information from other companies." OpenAI indicated that it had proactively offered to cooperate in resolving the matter, but Apple chose to file a lawsuit, claiming that its request for a preliminary injunction was "based on false information and completely unnecessary." Previously, Apple sued OpenAI in July, accusing it of poaching Apple employees and using confidential information to develop AI products.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.