BTC $86,048.40 +1.77%
ETH $2,746.91 +0.97%
BNB $787.20 +0.26%
XRP $1.53 +3.34%
SOL $117.01 +1.20%
TRX $0.3476 +0.93%
DOGE $0.0982 +6.05%
ADA $0.2465 +3.04%
BCH $269.89 +3.03%
LINK $12.95 -0.43%
HYPE $95.14 -0.05%
AAVE $141.36 -3.15%
SUI $1.01 +2.16%
XLM $0.2117 +1.28%
ZEC $1,507.82 -0.78%
AAPL $339.29 +1.18%
AMZN $259.77 +1.43%
GOOGL $357.63 +1.37%
MSFT $503.29 +1.70%
META $740.66 +8.54%
NVDA $227.18 +1.27%
TSLA $377.84 +2.12%
SNDK $1,769.12 -2.65%
INTC $121.90 +5.95%
SPCX $152.61 -1.22%
MU $1,038.53 -0.03%
AMD $612.36 +6.53%
BTC $86,048.40 +1.77%
ETH $2,746.91 +0.97%
BNB $787.20 +0.26%
XRP $1.53 +3.34%
SOL $117.01 +1.20%
TRX $0.3476 +0.93%
DOGE $0.0982 +6.05%
ADA $0.2465 +3.04%
BCH $269.89 +3.03%
LINK $12.95 -0.43%
HYPE $95.14 -0.05%
AAVE $141.36 -3.15%
SUI $1.01 +2.16%
XLM $0.2117 +1.28%
ZEC $1,507.82 -0.78%
AAPL $339.29 +1.18%
AMZN $259.77 +1.43%
GOOGL $357.63 +1.37%
MSFT $503.29 +1.70%
META $740.66 +8.54%
NVDA $227.18 +1.27%
TSLA $377.84 +2.12%
SNDK $1,769.12 -2.65%
INTC $121.90 +5.95%
SPCX $152.61 -1.22%
MU $1,038.53 -0.03%
AMD $612.36 +6.53%

inj

All
Article
Flash

first_img The Southern District Court of New York rejected the preliminary injunction motion against Susquehanna for insider trading

On September 14, 2026, Judge Arun Subramanian of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an opinion and order denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. The case number is 1:26-cv-05474-AS, with the plaintiffs being market makers Susquehanna Securities, LLC and Susquehanna Investment Group, and the intervenor being market maker Citadel Securities LLC, while the defendants are John Does 1 through 100. The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit on June 29, 2026, claiming violations under Section 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and unjust enrichment claims.The plaintiffs allege that the defendants traded on significant non-public information, specifically an announcement on May 22, 2026, regarding "the Chinese government's crackdown on cross-border trading platforms," which led to a collapse of the relevant securities. The plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction to restrict the 40 defendants, as reduced, from transferring, encumbering, removing, or otherwise disposing of the profits obtained through the alleged insider trading activities in their accounts at third-party brokerage firms, or sought a seizure order. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the elements necessary to prove that they may suffer irreparable harm, and the motion was denied.

first_img A U.S. judge ruled that the Trump administration illegally retaliated against Anthropic, lifting the ban and issuing a permanent injunction

U.S. Federal Judge Rita Lin issued a partial summary judgment in a 59-page ruling regarding Anthropic's lawsuit against the Trump administration, determining that the government's punishment of Anthropic for publicly refusing to allow the military to use its Claude large model for mass surveillance of U.S. citizens and lethal autonomous operations constituted illegal retaliation, violating the First Amendment, due process clause, and the Administrative Procedure Act. The judge also revoked the related designations and Defense Secretary Hegseth's injunction, issuing a permanent injunction.The controversy arose from the Pentagon's demand that Anthropic remove all usage restrictions and accept terms allowing "all lawful uses," while Anthropic maintained its last two bottom lines. On February 27, 2025, Trump ordered all federal agencies to cease using the company's technology, and Hegseth subsequently prohibited any military contractors from doing business with it. During this process, the government abandoned its core claims, acknowledging that Anthropic had no backdoor access to the deployed models and that the risks of Claude were no greater than those of other "black box" systems. Lin pointed out that the government's punishment under the guise of "national security" was not a blank check, and that the government had been operating under the preliminary injunction since March without indicating any harm.Anthropic did not achieve a complete victory, as its claim that Trump's directive exceeded presidential authority was dismissed. Anthropic informed the court that if the relevant measures continued, its defense-related revenue would decrease by 50% to 100%, resulting in a loss of billions of dollars in overall revenue by 2026.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.